• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Textual evidence systematic reviews series paper 3: critical appraisal of evidence from narrative, opinion, and policy

A. McArthur, A. Cooper, D. Edwards, J. Klugarova, H. Yan, BV. Barber, EE. Gregg, LE. Weeks, Z. Jordan

. 2025 ; 23 (5) : 833-839. [pub] 20250506

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25015961

JBI has long held the view that an inclusive approach to the conceptualization of what counts as evidence is important to the evidence-based movement. JBI's approach for appraising textual evidence had encompassed all forms of text (narrative, opinion, and policy), with one general tool used to guide critical appraisal. The proliferation of textual evidence and increase in textual evidence reviews demonstrate the need to reconceptualize JBI's methodological approach to critically appraising textual evidence. The objective of this paper is to outline the updated methodological approach to systematic reviews of textual evidence, especially in relation to the development of 3 separate critical appraisal tools for narrative, expert opinion, and policy text. Using an adapted Delphi approach, the JBI Textual Evidence Methodology Group convened over several rounds of meetings and discussions with international experts to reach consensus on the reconceptualization of critical appraisal tools for textual evidence sources. Strategies to effectively interrogate the legitimacy and authenticity of sources were found to be dependent upon the type of textual evidence under review. Therefore, 3 separate critical appraisal tools for narrative, expert opinion, and policy text were developed. This paper provides an overview of the development of 3 separate critical appraisal tools, highlighting the complex nature of textual evidence data sources.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015961
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731091406.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.11124/JBIES-24-00293 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39905824
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a McArthur, Alexa $u JBI, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/000000016542892
245    10
$a Textual evidence systematic reviews series paper 3: critical appraisal of evidence from narrative, opinion, and policy / $c A. McArthur, A. Cooper, D. Edwards, J. Klugarova, H. Yan, BV. Barber, EE. Gregg, LE. Weeks, Z. Jordan
520    9_
$a JBI has long held the view that an inclusive approach to the conceptualization of what counts as evidence is important to the evidence-based movement. JBI's approach for appraising textual evidence had encompassed all forms of text (narrative, opinion, and policy), with one general tool used to guide critical appraisal. The proliferation of textual evidence and increase in textual evidence reviews demonstrate the need to reconceptualize JBI's methodological approach to critically appraising textual evidence. The objective of this paper is to outline the updated methodological approach to systematic reviews of textual evidence, especially in relation to the development of 3 separate critical appraisal tools for narrative, expert opinion, and policy text. Using an adapted Delphi approach, the JBI Textual Evidence Methodology Group convened over several rounds of meetings and discussions with international experts to reach consensus on the reconceptualization of critical appraisal tools for textual evidence sources. Strategies to effectively interrogate the legitimacy and authenticity of sources were found to be dependent upon the type of textual evidence under review. Therefore, 3 separate critical appraisal tools for narrative, expert opinion, and policy text were developed. This paper provides an overview of the development of 3 separate critical appraisal tools, highlighting the complex nature of textual evidence data sources.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a delfská metoda $7 D003697
650    12
$a medicína založená na důkazech $x metody $7 D019317
650    _2
$a vyprávění $7 D033262
650    _2
$a výzkumný projekt $7 D012107
650    _2
$a přehledová literatura jako téma $7 D012196
650    _2
$a systematický přehled jako téma $7 D000078202
650    _2
$a periodika jako téma $7 D010506
650    _2
$a redakční směrnice $7 D035081
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Cooper, Adam $u UCSF Centre for Evidence Implementation: A JBI Centre of Excellence, University of California San Francisco Medical Centre, San Francisco, CA, USA
700    1_
$a Edwards, Deborah $u The Wales Centre for Evidence Based Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
700    1_
$a Klugarova, Jitka $u The Czech Republic: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Yan, Hu $u Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing: A JBI Centre of Excellence, School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
700    1_
$a Barber, Brittany V $u School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada $u Aligning Health Needs and Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A JBI Centre of Excellence, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
700    1_
$a Gregg, Emily E $u Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada $u The University of New Brunswick (UNB) Saint John Collaboration for Evidence-Informed Healthcare: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Saint John, NB, Canada
700    1_
$a Weeks, Lori E $u School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada $u Aligning Health Needs and Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A JBI Centre of Excellence, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
700    1_
$a Jordan, Zoe $u JBI, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000191251582
773    0_
$w MED00207800 $t JBI evidence synthesis $x 2689-8381 $g Roč. 23, č. 5 (2025), s. 833-839
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39905824 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731091401 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366661 $s 1253086
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 23 $c 5 $d 833-839 $e 20250506 $i 2689-8381 $m JBI evidence synthesis $n JBI Evid Synth $x MED00207800
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace