-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Processes for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: A Scoping Review
A. Langaufova, T. Friessova, D. Dolanova, T. Vrbova, P. Burilova, N. Beharkova, A. Pokorna
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, scoping review
Grantová podpora
Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum Ceské Republiky.
Czech Health Research Council (NU23-09-00328; Methodology of creating plain language recommendations for knowledge translation to support evidence-based decision-making in healthcare in the Czech Republic).
PubMed
40875579
DOI
10.1111/jep.70256
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- jazyk (prostředek komunikace) * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma * normy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- scoping review MeSH
RATIONALE: Plain language recommendations (PLRs) offer clear and understandable statements based on trustworthy guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to synthesise methodological evidence for developing PLRs in the health care context. METHODS: We followed the JBI methodology for scoping review development and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping review reporting. PLRs in the context of health care guidelines or patient versions of guidelines were included. A systematic search was run in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and the repositories of guideline developers until November 2023. Due to the research ́s longitudinal nature, the search was updated in May 2025 to verify findings gathered so far. Reviewers extracted data independently and synthesised evidence narratively. RESULTS: In total, 2512 citations and 66 repositories of guideline developers were screened. Nine articles from databases and eight documents representing seven sources of evidence from guideline developers' repositories were included in the final synthesis. Information about PLRs, their development, and methodology were summarised. Various infographics are used when creating PLRs. The target groups of PLRs are, e.g. patients, policymakers, the public, and healthcare providers. The patients could be involved in creating PLRs. The developers can draw from the GIN Public Toolkit, RIGHT-PVG checklist or DISCERN. Although these methodologies generally cover the development of knowledge translation tools and patients' version of guidelines (PVGs). Numerous tools can be used to translate scientific language and to formulate PLRs. CONCLUSION: We propose policy support for the conduct and implementation of PLRs for healthcare guidelines drawn from available evidence-based resources identified by our review. It is desirable to report approaches for communicating recommendations from healthcare guidelines and verify the actionability and understandability of these formats.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25021715
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20251023075809.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 251014s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/jep.70256 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40875579
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Langaufova, Alena $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000304511978
- 245 10
- $a Processes for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: A Scoping Review / $c A. Langaufova, T. Friessova, D. Dolanova, T. Vrbova, P. Burilova, N. Beharkova, A. Pokorna
- 520 9_
- $a RATIONALE: Plain language recommendations (PLRs) offer clear and understandable statements based on trustworthy guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to synthesise methodological evidence for developing PLRs in the health care context. METHODS: We followed the JBI methodology for scoping review development and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping review reporting. PLRs in the context of health care guidelines or patient versions of guidelines were included. A systematic search was run in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and the repositories of guideline developers until November 2023. Due to the research ́s longitudinal nature, the search was updated in May 2025 to verify findings gathered so far. Reviewers extracted data independently and synthesised evidence narratively. RESULTS: In total, 2512 citations and 66 repositories of guideline developers were screened. Nine articles from databases and eight documents representing seven sources of evidence from guideline developers' repositories were included in the final synthesis. Information about PLRs, their development, and methodology were summarised. Various infographics are used when creating PLRs. The target groups of PLRs are, e.g. patients, policymakers, the public, and healthcare providers. The patients could be involved in creating PLRs. The developers can draw from the GIN Public Toolkit, RIGHT-PVG checklist or DISCERN. Although these methodologies generally cover the development of knowledge translation tools and patients' version of guidelines (PVGs). Numerous tools can be used to translate scientific language and to formulate PLRs. CONCLUSION: We propose policy support for the conduct and implementation of PLRs for healthcare guidelines drawn from available evidence-based resources identified by our review. It is desirable to report approaches for communicating recommendations from healthcare guidelines and verify the actionability and understandability of these formats.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $x normy $7 D017410
- 650 12
- $a jazyk (prostředek komunikace) $7 D007802
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a scoping review $7 D000098583
- 700 1_
- $a Friessova, Tereza $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000202797936
- 700 1_
- $a Dolanova, Dana $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000249934168
- 700 1_
- $a Vrbova, Tereza $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000324658782
- 700 1_
- $a Burilova, Petra $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000284928994
- 700 1_
- $a Beharkova, Natalia $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000204726621 $7 xx0079434
- 700 1_
- $a Pokorna, Andrea $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000213056455 $7 mzk2006353915
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006122 $t Journal of evaluation in clinical practice $x 1365-2753 $g Roč. 31, č. 6 (2025), s. e70256
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40875579 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20251014 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20251023075815 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2416865 $s 1259878
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 31 $c 6 $d e70256 $e - $i 1365-2753 $m Journal of evaluation in clinical practice $n J Eval Clin Pract $x MED00006122
- GRA __
- $p Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum Ceské Republiky.
- GRA __
- $p Czech Health Research Council (NU23-09-00328; Methodology of creating plain language recommendations for knowledge translation to support evidence-based decision-making in healthcare in the Czech Republic).
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20251014