Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Processes for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: A Scoping Review

A. Langaufova, T. Friessova, D. Dolanova, T. Vrbova, P. Burilova, N. Beharkova, A. Pokorna

. 2025 ; 31 (6) : e70256. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, scoping review

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25021715

Grantová podpora
Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum Ceské Republiky.
Czech Health Research Council (NU23-09-00328; Methodology of creating plain language recommendations for knowledge translation to support evidence-based decision-making in healthcare in the Czech Republic).

RATIONALE: Plain language recommendations (PLRs) offer clear and understandable statements based on trustworthy guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to synthesise methodological evidence for developing PLRs in the health care context. METHODS: We followed the JBI methodology for scoping review development and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping review reporting. PLRs in the context of health care guidelines or patient versions of guidelines were included. A systematic search was run in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and the repositories of guideline developers until November 2023. Due to the research ́s longitudinal nature, the search was updated in May 2025 to verify findings gathered so far. Reviewers extracted data independently and synthesised evidence narratively. RESULTS: In total, 2512 citations and 66 repositories of guideline developers were screened. Nine articles from databases and eight documents representing seven sources of evidence from guideline developers' repositories were included in the final synthesis. Information about PLRs, their development, and methodology were summarised. Various infographics are used when creating PLRs. The target groups of PLRs are, e.g. patients, policymakers, the public, and healthcare providers. The patients could be involved in creating PLRs. The developers can draw from the GIN Public Toolkit, RIGHT-PVG checklist or DISCERN. Although these methodologies generally cover the development of knowledge translation tools and patients' version of guidelines (PVGs). Numerous tools can be used to translate scientific language and to formulate PLRs. CONCLUSION: We propose policy support for the conduct and implementation of PLRs for healthcare guidelines drawn from available evidence-based resources identified by our review. It is desirable to report approaches for communicating recommendations from healthcare guidelines and verify the actionability and understandability of these formats.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25021715
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20251023075809.0
007      
ta
008      
251014s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jep.70256 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40875579
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Langaufova, Alena $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000304511978
245    10
$a Processes for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: A Scoping Review / $c A. Langaufova, T. Friessova, D. Dolanova, T. Vrbova, P. Burilova, N. Beharkova, A. Pokorna
520    9_
$a RATIONALE: Plain language recommendations (PLRs) offer clear and understandable statements based on trustworthy guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to synthesise methodological evidence for developing PLRs in the health care context. METHODS: We followed the JBI methodology for scoping review development and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping review reporting. PLRs in the context of health care guidelines or patient versions of guidelines were included. A systematic search was run in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and the repositories of guideline developers until November 2023. Due to the research ́s longitudinal nature, the search was updated in May 2025 to verify findings gathered so far. Reviewers extracted data independently and synthesised evidence narratively. RESULTS: In total, 2512 citations and 66 repositories of guideline developers were screened. Nine articles from databases and eight documents representing seven sources of evidence from guideline developers' repositories were included in the final synthesis. Information about PLRs, their development, and methodology were summarised. Various infographics are used when creating PLRs. The target groups of PLRs are, e.g. patients, policymakers, the public, and healthcare providers. The patients could be involved in creating PLRs. The developers can draw from the GIN Public Toolkit, RIGHT-PVG checklist or DISCERN. Although these methodologies generally cover the development of knowledge translation tools and patients' version of guidelines (PVGs). Numerous tools can be used to translate scientific language and to formulate PLRs. CONCLUSION: We propose policy support for the conduct and implementation of PLRs for healthcare guidelines drawn from available evidence-based resources identified by our review. It is desirable to report approaches for communicating recommendations from healthcare guidelines and verify the actionability and understandability of these formats.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $x normy $7 D017410
650    12
$a jazyk (prostředek komunikace) $7 D007802
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a scoping review $7 D000098583
700    1_
$a Friessova, Tereza $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000202797936
700    1_
$a Dolanova, Dana $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000249934168
700    1_
$a Vrbova, Tereza $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000324658782
700    1_
$a Burilova, Petra $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000284928994
700    1_
$a Beharkova, Natalia $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000204726621 $7 xx0079434
700    1_
$a Pokorna, Andrea $u Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000213056455 $7 mzk2006353915
773    0_
$w MED00006122 $t Journal of evaluation in clinical practice $x 1365-2753 $g Roč. 31, č. 6 (2025), s. e70256
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40875579 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20251014 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20251023075815 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2416865 $s 1259878
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 31 $c 6 $d e70256 $e - $i 1365-2753 $m Journal of evaluation in clinical practice $n J Eval Clin Pract $x MED00006122
GRA    __
$p Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum Ceské Republiky.
GRA    __
$p Czech Health Research Council (NU23-09-00328; Methodology of creating plain language recommendations for knowledge translation to support evidence-based decision-making in healthcare in the Czech Republic).
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20251014

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...