Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Evaluating Perinatal Health in Europe: A Comparison of Routine Population Birth Data Sources

M. Philibert, M. Gissler, O. Zurriaga, S. Donati, Z. Drausnik, G. Heller, A. Macfarlane, A. Mohangoo, L. Sakkeus, V. Tica, P. Velebil, J. Klimont, L. Broeders, TA. Rihs, J. Zeitlin, Euro‐Peristat Research Group

. 2025 ; 39 (5) : 405-416. [pub] 20250311

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25022572

Grantová podpora
101018317 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
ANR-21-C016-004-01 French National Research Agency

BACKGROUND: International comparisons of population birth data provide essential benchmarks for evaluating perinatal health policies. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe routine national data sources in Europe by their ability to provide core perinatal health indicators. METHODS: The Euro-Peristat Network collected routine national data on a recommended set of core indicators from 2015 to 2021 using a federated protocol based on a common data model with 16 data items. Data providers completed an online questionnaire to describe the sources used in each country. We classified countries by the number of data items they provided (all 16, 15-14, < 14). RESULTS: A total of 29 out of the 31 countries that provided data responded to the survey. Routine data sources included birth certificates (15 countries), electronic medical records (EMR) from delivery hospitalisations (16 countries), direct entry by health providers (9 countries), EMR from other care providers (7 countries) and Hospital Discharge Summaries (7 countries). Completeness of population coverage was at least 98%, with 17 countries reporting 100%. These databases most often included mothers giving birth in the national territory, regardless of nationality or place of residence (24 countries), whereas others register births to residents only. In 20 countries, routine sources were linked, including linkage between birth and death certificates (16 countries). Countries providing all 16 items (n = 8) were more likely to use EMRs from delivery hospitalisations (100%) compared to 50% and 11% in countries with 15-14 items (n = 12) and < 14 items (n = 9), respectively. Linkage was also more common in these countries (100%) versus 75% and 56%, respectively. Other data source characteristics did not differ by the ability to provide data on core perinatal indicators. CONCLUSIONS: There are wide differences between countries in the data sources used to construct perinatal health indicators in Europe. Countries using EMR linking to other sources had the best data availability.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25022572
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20251023080434.0
007      
ta
008      
251014s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/ppe.13178 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40070031
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Philibert, Marianne $u Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology, Université Paris Cité, Inserm, Paris, France $1 https://orcid.org/0000000328477655
245    10
$a Evaluating Perinatal Health in Europe: A Comparison of Routine Population Birth Data Sources / $c M. Philibert, M. Gissler, O. Zurriaga, S. Donati, Z. Drausnik, G. Heller, A. Macfarlane, A. Mohangoo, L. Sakkeus, V. Tica, P. Velebil, J. Klimont, L. Broeders, TA. Rihs, J. Zeitlin, Euro‐Peristat Research Group
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: International comparisons of population birth data provide essential benchmarks for evaluating perinatal health policies. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe routine national data sources in Europe by their ability to provide core perinatal health indicators. METHODS: The Euro-Peristat Network collected routine national data on a recommended set of core indicators from 2015 to 2021 using a federated protocol based on a common data model with 16 data items. Data providers completed an online questionnaire to describe the sources used in each country. We classified countries by the number of data items they provided (all 16, 15-14, < 14). RESULTS: A total of 29 out of the 31 countries that provided data responded to the survey. Routine data sources included birth certificates (15 countries), electronic medical records (EMR) from delivery hospitalisations (16 countries), direct entry by health providers (9 countries), EMR from other care providers (7 countries) and Hospital Discharge Summaries (7 countries). Completeness of population coverage was at least 98%, with 17 countries reporting 100%. These databases most often included mothers giving birth in the national territory, regardless of nationality or place of residence (24 countries), whereas others register births to residents only. In 20 countries, routine sources were linked, including linkage between birth and death certificates (16 countries). Countries providing all 16 items (n = 8) were more likely to use EMRs from delivery hospitalisations (100%) compared to 50% and 11% in countries with 15-14 items (n = 12) and < 14 items (n = 9), respectively. Linkage was also more common in these countries (100%) versus 75% and 56%, respectively. Other data source characteristics did not differ by the ability to provide data on core perinatal indicators. CONCLUSIONS: There are wide differences between countries in the data sources used to construct perinatal health indicators in Europe. Countries using EMR linking to other sources had the best data availability.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    12
$a perinatální péče $x statistika a číselné údaje $x normy $7 D018743
650    12
$a rodné listy $7 D001719
650    _2
$a elektronické zdravotní záznamy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D057286
650    12
$a rutinně sbírané zdravotní údaje $7 D000085143
650    _2
$a informační zdroje $7 D000093983
651    _2
$a Evropa $x epidemiologie $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Gissler, Mika $u THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland $u Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
700    1_
$a Zurriaga, Oscar $u Preventive Medicine and Public Health Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain $u FISABIO, Rare Diseases Research Area and Mixed Unit FISABIO-UVEG, Valencia, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/000000017279432X
700    1_
$a Donati, Serena $u National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion-Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italian National Health Institute, Rome, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000246072072
700    1_
$a Drausnik, Zeljka $u Division of Public Health, Croatian Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia
700    1_
$a Heller, Günther $u Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare IQTIG, Berlin, Germany
700    1_
$a Macfarlane, Alison $u Maternal and Child Health and Research Centre, City, University of London, London, UK
700    1_
$a Mohangoo, Ashna $u Foundation for Perinatal Interventions and Research in Suriname (PeriSur), Paramaribo, Suriname
700    1_
$a Sakkeus, Luule $u Estonian Institute for Population Studies, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia
700    1_
$a Tica, Vlad $u East European Institute for Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medicine, University "Ovidius" Constanţa, Romanian Academy of Scientists, Constanta, Romania
700    1_
$a Velebil, Petr $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague and 3rd Medical School of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Klimont, Jeannette $u Statistics Austria, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Broeders, Lisa $u Perined, Utrecht, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Rihs, Tonia A $u Federal Statistical Office, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Zeitlin, Jennifer $u Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology, Université Paris Cité, Inserm, Paris, France $1 https://orcid.org/0000000295682969
710    2_
$a Euro‐Peristat Research Group
773    0_
$w MED00007324 $t Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology $x 1365-3016 $g Roč. 39, č. 5 (2025), s. 405-416
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40070031 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20251014 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20251023080440 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2417379 $s 1260735
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 39 $c 5 $d 405-416 $e 20250311 $i 1365-3016 $m Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology $n Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol $x MED00007324
GRA    __
$a 101018317 $p European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
GRA    __
$a ANR-21-C016-004-01 $p French National Research Agency
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20251014

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace