Repair, replication and survival in uv-irradiated Escherichia coli
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
321311
DOI
10.1007/bf02881632
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- DNA, Bacterial biosynthesis radiation effects MeSH
- Escherichia coli growth & development metabolism radiation effects MeSH
- DNA Repair * MeSH
- DNA Replication * MeSH
- Light MeSH
- Ultraviolet Rays * MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- DNA, Bacterial MeSH
The influence of dimer removal through excision or photoreactivation on the kinetics of DNA synthesis, sedimentation profiles of DNA molecules and survival of cells was investigated in excision-deficient and excision-proficient Escherichia coli K-12 after a flux of 20 J M-2. In excision-deficient cells photoreactivation did not influence the kinetics of DNA synthesis for a long period and the sedimentation properties of DNA synthesized immediately after photoreactivation were influenced only slightly. However, survival was increased remarkably. In excision-proficient cells where dimers were removed through excision, the kinetics of DNA synthesis increased rapidly, normal-sized DNA molecules were synthesized 60 min after irradiation and survival was substantially higher than in the above-mentioned case. This can hardly be interpreted as a more complete repair of dimers by excision because the persistence of dimers in these cells did not significantly influence either the kinetics of DNA synthesis or normalization of DNA molecules and/or survival of cells. It is concluded that persisting dimers play an important role in excision-deficient but not in excision-proficient cells, that a non-dimer damage to DNA causes inhibition of DNA synthesis after UV and that this damage is of primary importance for excision-proficient cells which can easily cope with persisting dimers.
See more in PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1972 Jan;109(1):391-8 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 1970 Aug;51(3):459-72 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1974 Mar;117(3):1077-81 PubMed
Biophys J. 1975 Nov;15(11):1141-54 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 1972 May 28;66(3):319-37 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1971 Jan 1;228(1):117-26 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974 May 31;349(3):442-6 PubMed
Mutat Res. 1973 Jan;17(1):1-12 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1972 Sep;111(3):658-63 PubMed
Biophys J. 1971 Mar;11(3):295-301 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1973 Mar;113(3):1161-9 PubMed
Photochem Photobiol. 1977 Mar;25(3):259-64 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1977;22(3):232-6 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 1972 Apr 28;66(1):97-106 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1974;19(6):459-65 PubMed
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1968;33:195-207 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1967 Apr;93(4):1210-9 PubMed
Nat New Biol. 1972 Nov 8;240(97):52-3 PubMed
Biophys J. 1974 Oct;14(10):791-803 PubMed
Mutat Res. 1970 May;9(5):443-53 PubMed
Photochem Photobiol. 1969 Jun;9(6):537-48 PubMed
FEBS Lett. 1975 Dec 1;60(1):161-3 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 1969 Apr 14;41(1):1-23 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 1968 Jan 28;31(2):291-304 PubMed
Nature. 1966 Oct 29;212(5061):534-5 PubMed
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1969;23:487-514 PubMed
Anal Biochem. 1971 Oct;43(2):427-32 PubMed
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1969 Jul 23;36(2):203-8 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Aug 21;402(2):179-87 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 1971 Oct 14;61(1):25-44 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jul;72(7):2753-7 PubMed