Direct high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of the enantiomeric purity of levodopa and methyldopa: comparison with pharmacopoeial polarimetric methods
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
10704122
DOI
10.1016/s0731-7085(98)00257-x
PII: S0731-7085(98)00257-X
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Pharmacopoeias as Topic standards MeSH
- Evaluation Studies as Topic MeSH
- Levodopa analysis isolation & purification MeSH
- Ligands MeSH
- Methyldopa analysis isolation & purification MeSH
- Optical Rotation MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Solvents MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Stereoisomerism MeSH
- Teicoplanin chemistry MeSH
- Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid methods MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- Europe MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Levodopa MeSH
- Ligands MeSH
- Methyldopa MeSH
- Solvents MeSH
- Teicoplanin MeSH
Chiral high-performance liquid chromatography was employed for determination of the enantiomeric purity of levodopa and methyldopa. The determination of D-DOPA in levodopa was accomplished using a chiral ligand-exchange chromatograpy with an ordinary C18 column and a chiral mobile phase containing N,N-dimethyl-L-phenylalanine and Cu(II) acetate or by means of LC on a teicoplanin column in conjunction with ethanol-water (65:35, v/v). Both methods gave good performance, however, the latter was faster and more convenient and suitable for routine analyses. For the determination of D-methyldopa a LC method based on the use of a teicoplanin column in polar organic mode with methanol-acetic acid-triethylamine (1,000:0.05:0.05, v/v/v) mobile phase was developed. The precision, accuracy, linearity and selectivity were satisfactory. In comparison with pharmacopoeial polarimetric methods (according to the European Pharmacopoeia and the Pharmacopoea Bohemoslovaca), the LC methods proved to be much more sensitive giving detection limits 0.04% of D-DOPA and 0.3% of D-methyldopa.
References provided by Crossref.org