Leczenie w psychiatrycznych oddziałach dziennych w porównaniu z oddziałami całodobowymi w róznych europejskich systemach opieki zdrowotnej--załozenia programu EDEN
[Treatment in psychiatric day hospital in comparison with inpatient wards in different European health care systems--objectives of EDEN project]
Jazyk polština Země Polsko Médium print
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
12647460
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- denní péče o pacienty ekonomika statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- duševní poruchy ekonomika terapie MeSH
- hospitalizovaní pacienti * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- multicentrické studie jako téma MeSH
- poskytování zdravotní péče metody normy MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma normy MeSH
- ústavy pro duševně nemocné ekonomika statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- výsledky a postupy - zhodnocení (zdravotní péče) MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Londýn MeSH
- Německo MeSH
- Polsko MeSH
- Slovenská republika MeSH
The paper presents the objectives and design of an ongoing multicenter randomized, controlled trial EDEN (European Day Hospital EvaluatioN). The EDEN-study aims to evaluate the efficacy of acute psychiatric treatment in a day hospital setting in five European centres: Dresden, London, Michalovce, Prague and Wroclaw. The main hypothesis is that day hospital treatment for acute psychiatric patients is as effective as conventional inpatient hospital care. The objectives of the study are to evaluate the viability and effectiveness of day hospitals for acute psychiatric treatment, to identify subgroups of patients with a more or less favourable outcome so that the treatment setting might be specifically applied and to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of day hospital treatment compared to conventional inpatient treatment. The study utilises a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) design with repeated measures at a maximum of six time points: at admission (t1), one week after admission (t2), four weeks after admission (t3), discharge (t4), three months after discharge (t5), and 12 months after discharge (t6). A combination of well-established standardised assessment instruments and open questions is used in 6 time periods. If the findings accept the main hypothesis of the study, some practical consequences could be inevitable: at a mental health policy level, these results could lead to an increase in the capacity of day hospitals; at the clinical level clinicians could redefine their concepts of care to consider the day hospital as an alternative to conventional inpatient treatment; from economic point of view could lead to reduction of treatment costs.