Disperze QT intervalu. Mýtus nebo diagnostický ukazatel?
[Dispersion of QT intervals--a myth or a diagnostic symptom?]
Jazyk čeština Země Česko Médium print
Typ dokumentu anglický abstrakt, časopisecké články
PubMed
15532899
- MeSH
- antidepresiva tricyklická farmakologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dothiepin farmakologie MeSH
- elektrokardiografie * účinky léků MeSH
- kardiovaskulární komplikace v těhotenství diagnóza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mapování potenciálů tělesného povrchu MeSH
- srdeční arytmie diagnóza MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- anglický abstrakt MeSH
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antidepresiva tricyklická MeSH
- dothiepin MeSH
BACKGROUND: QT interval dispersion (QTd) is conventionally interpreted as a result of repolarization heterogeneity in ventricular myocardium. However, another concept of QTd origin has been discussed recently, suggesting that different projections of the repolarization vector into individual ECG leads could be responsible for the differences in QT interval duration. Moreover, the reproducibility could be influenced by factors both electrocardiographic (T wave amplitude, U wave) and extracardiac (noise, ECG measures). In the presented study we have followed the QTd in two groups of patients with proved changes of an electric heart field. METHODS AND RESULTS: Studied groups: 1. Control group, 2. Healthy pregnant women, 3. Patients treated with dosulepine. QT interval was measured from 80 unipolar chest leads used for body surface potential mapping. The QTd was significantly higher in both experimental groups in comparison with the control group (p < 0.001). Significant correlation was found between the QTd and dosulepine plasma level (p < 0.001). Also amplitude of the T wave loop was in both groups decreased and its width increased (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: If appropriate procedure of measurement is used, the QTd is significantly increased in many physiological and pathological states. Clinical relevancy of borderline increased values has to be interpreted very carefully.