Structural and kinetic alterations of constitutive conidial alkaline phosphatase from the osmotically-sensitive mutant of Neurospora crassa
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
17176763
DOI
10.1007/bf02931587
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- alkalická fosfatasa chemie izolace a purifikace metabolismus MeSH
- kinetika MeSH
- koncentrace vodíkových iontů MeSH
- Neurospora crassa enzymologie genetika MeSH
- osmotický tlak MeSH
- spory hub enzymologie MeSH
- substrátová specifita MeSH
- teplota MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- alkalická fosfatasa MeSH
The osmotically-sensitive os-1 mutant of Neurospora crassa overproduced conidial alkaline phosphatase. The enzyme was purified by Phenyl-Sepharose CL-4B chromatography and Sephadex G-200 gel filtration. PAGE analysis of the purified enzyme suggested the occurrence of aggregation and/or disaggregation phenomena. The enzyme is a glycoprotein containing 16% saccharide, with apparent molar mass of 137 kDa. Two protein bands (36 and 62 kDa) were observed in SDS-PAGE, suggesting that the native enzyme was a trimer. The pI was estimated to be 2.7, and optima of pH and temperature were 9.5 and 65 degrees C, respectively. The enzyme showed broad substrate specificity, hydrolyzing preferentially 4-nitrophenyl phosphate, O-phosphoamino-acids and 2-phosphoglycerate. The hydrolysis of 4-nitrophenyl phosphate was stimulated by Co(II) (26%), Ni(II) (23%) and Mg(II) ions (80%). The enzyme was stable for up to 6 months at 4 degrees C in 5 mmol/L Tris-HCl buffer and also upon storage at 25 degrees C for 10 d. The kinetic and structural properties of the conidial enzyme purified from the os-1 mutant were quite different from those of the wild type strain. The enzyme overproduction observed in the mutant may be related to cell wall alterations that affect the process of enzyme secretion.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5 PubMed
J Biol Chem. 1974 Aug 10;249(15):4679-88 PubMed
Curr Genet. 1987;11(6-7):521-7 PubMed
Arch Microbiol. 1974;101(4):303-20 PubMed
Braz J Med Biol Res. 1986;19(1):27-32 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961 Sep 2;52:13-29 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961 Nov 25;54:101-9 PubMed
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Dec 28;121:404-27 PubMed
J Biol Chem. 1966 Apr 10;241(7):1468-72 PubMed
J Biol Chem. 1968 Jun 10;243(11):3076-82 PubMed
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1998 Oct;62(10):1938-46 PubMed
Biochemistry. 1999 Aug 3;38(31):9887-98 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Dec;66(12):5107-9 PubMed
Biochemistry. 1996 Jun 11;35(23):7299-307 PubMed
Pharm Res. 1994 Dec;11(12):1721-5 PubMed
Anal Biochem. 1981 Sep 1;116(1):53-64 PubMed
Microbiol Rev. 1982 Dec;46(4):426-570 PubMed
FASEB J. 1992 May;6(8):2545-52 PubMed
Cell. 1977 Dec;12(4):1133-41 PubMed
J Cell Comp Physiol. 1961 Aug;58:11-6 PubMed
J Basic Microbiol. 2002;42(1):55-66 PubMed
Curr Microbiol. 1997 Jun;34(6):340-7 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1972 Aug;111(2):443-6 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1973 Sep;115(3):796-804 PubMed
Phytochemistry. 1996 Jan;41(1):71-5 PubMed