Motor cortex stimulation in rats with chronic constriction injury
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
- MeSH
- bolest patofyziologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- elektrostimulační terapie metody MeSH
- krysa rodu Rattus MeSH
- měření bolesti metody MeSH
- motorické korové centrum fyziologie MeSH
- nemoci sedacího nervu patofyziologie MeSH
- potkani Wistar MeSH
- stenóza patofyziologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- krysa rodu Rattus MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) has gained a significant role in treatment of neuropathic pain. In order to evaluate effect of MCS in experimental animals we applied MCS to rats with neuropathic pain, which was evoked by chronic constriction injury (CCI) to the left sciatic nerve. Pain thresholds of both hind limbs were measured before, immediately after MCS, 1 h after MCS and 1 day after MCS. Effect of the stimulation was studied with respect to laterality (contralateral and ipsilateral MCS) and duration (short-term 10-min and long-term 1-h stimulation). It was found out that in control rats MCS did not affect thermal nociceptive thresholds. However, in CCI animals following results were obtained: difference score (difference in paw withdrawal latency between ligated and non-ligated hind limb) significantly decreased after both short- and long-term contralateral MCS; the difference score after the long-term ipsilateral MCS (related to the ligated hind limb) was not significantly different from that of intact animals; the effects of the contralateral short-term and the ipsilateral long-term stimulation faded within 1 h after the end of MCS, while the effect of the contralateral long-term MCS remained 1 h after the end of the MCS and faded within 24 h. It is concluded that MCS in experimental animals exerts similar effects as in human suffering from neuropathic pain and that the effect might be evoked from both cerebral cortices.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1993;58:150-3 PubMed
Life Sci. 2000 Apr 7;66(20):PL271-6 PubMed
Brain Res. 2005 Mar 2;1036(1-2):173-9 PubMed
Neurosurgery. 1995 May;36(5):1037-9; discussion 1039-40 PubMed
Neuroreport. 2001 Sep 17;12(13):2963-5 PubMed
Neurosurgery. 2005 Feb;56(2):290-7; discussion 290-7 PubMed
J Neurosurg. 1993 Mar;78(3):393-401 PubMed
Pain. 1999 Sep;82(3):245-251 PubMed
Brain Res. 2005 Sep 28;1057(1-2):134-40 PubMed
Pain. 2000 Feb;84(2-3):431-7 PubMed
Science. 1969 Apr 25;164(3878):444-5 PubMed
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138(11):1300-6 PubMed
Pain. 1983 Jun;16(2):109-110 PubMed
Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1991;52:137-9 PubMed
J Comp Neurol. 1992 Dec 1;326(1):133-46 PubMed
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2005 Aug;26(4):283-8 PubMed
J Neurosurg. 1995 Dec;83(6):1117 PubMed
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1994;62(1-4):295-9 PubMed
Brain Res. 2001 Jun 8;903(1-2):110-6 PubMed
Brain. 2002 Jul;125(Pt 7):1660-4 PubMed
Pain. 1988 Apr;33(1):87-107 PubMed
