Pregnancy outcomes after uterine artery occlusion: prospective multicentric study
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
18155701
DOI
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.033
PII: S0015-0282(07)03176-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Arteries surgery MeSH
- Cesarean Section MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Uterine Artery Embolization adverse effects MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Laparoscopy adverse effects MeSH
- Leiomyoma surgery therapy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Uterine Neoplasms surgery therapy MeSH
- Labor Presentation MeSH
- Live Birth MeSH
- Premature Birth etiology MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Abortion, Spontaneous etiology MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Pregnancy Rate MeSH
- Uterus blood supply MeSH
- Vascular Surgical Procedures adverse effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion (LUAO) and uterine artery embolization (UAE) in women with symptomatic fibroids. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical multicentric study. SETTING: Endoscopic center in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at a hospital in the Czech Republic. PATIENT(S): Thirty-eight pregnant women after LUAO and 20 pregnant women after UAE. INTERVENTION(S): Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion and UAE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy, abortion, preterm delivery, and live-birth rates. RESULT(S): Pregnancies after uterine embolization had a statistically significantly higher rate for spontaneous abortion (56%) than did pregnancies after surgical uterine artery occlusion (10.5%). The risk of malpresentation (20%) and the rate for cesarean section (80%) after UAE similarly were higher than was the risk after laparoscopic occlusion; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Also, there were no significant differences between the groups in preterm deliveries (15.3% in the LUAO group vs. 20% in the UAE group). CONCLUSION(S): Pregnancies of women who were treated with uterine embolization were at significantly increased risk for spontaneous abortion when compared with pregnancies of women treated with LUAO.
References provided by Crossref.org