Transoral and combined transoral-transcervical approach in the surgery of parapharyngeal tumors
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Neck MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pharyngeal Neoplasms surgery MeSH
- Nerve Sheath Neoplasms surgery MeSH
- Salivary Gland Neoplasms surgery MeSH
- Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures methods MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging MeSH
- Mouth MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The goal of parapharyngeal space (PPS) tumor surgery is to obtain adequate visualization to ensure complete removal with preservation of the surrounding nerves and vessels. Different surgical approaches have been described. Transoral approach is the most controversial one due to cited limited exposure, risk of tumor spillage, and possibility of neurovascular injury. We performed retrospective analysis of 26 consecutive patients who had undergone transoral or combined transoral-transcervical resection of PPS tumors from January 1997 to December 2007. Both approaches were safely employed to remove selected PPS tumors. Majority of treated tumors were pleomorphic adenomas (14 minor salivary gland and 7 deep lobe parotid gland tumors). Two cases of malignant salivary gland tumors, 4 nerve sheath tumors and 1 lymphangioma were also excised. Mean tumor size was 6.1 cm (range 2-11 cm). Visualization was felt to be adequate and dissection safe. Radical resection was achieved in 24 cases. Near-total resection was achieved in two cases where otherwise other approach would be suitable but cannot be undertaken because of patient refusal and comorbidities. Patients with malignant tumors had postoperative radiotherapy. Radically treated cases are disease free. One of the near-totally resected tumors needed revision surgery. Neither major complications nor disordered healing were observed. Transoral approach provides access to selected cases of PPS tumors based on preoperative imaging methods and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Risk of non-radical resection is acceptable. It can be combined with external approach to achieve safe resection of some benign tumors which would need transmandibular approach.
See more in PubMed
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Jun;41(3):142-6 PubMed
Laryngoscope. 1988 Mar;98(3):266-9 PubMed
Head Neck Surg. 1982 Mar-Apr;4(4):281-9 PubMed
Radiology. 1988 Oct;169(1):81-5 PubMed
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Dec;123(12):1271-5 PubMed
Head Neck. 1995 Mar-Apr;17(2):124-30 PubMed
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;254(2):110-2 PubMed
Arch Otolaryngol. 1979 Feb;105(2):99-107 PubMed
Laryngorhinootologie. 2002 Nov;81(11):797-806 PubMed
Head Neck. 2005 Aug;27(8):669-75 PubMed
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989 Apr;98(4 Pt 1):320-1 PubMed
Diagn Cytopathol. 2005 Jan;32(1):11-5 PubMed
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Mar;134(3):466-70 PubMed
Arch Otolaryngol. 1981 Nov;107(11):698-702 PubMed
Laryngoscope. 1990 Jun;100(6):583-9 PubMed
Laryngoscope. 1994 May;104(5 Pt 2 Suppl 63):1-28 PubMed