Differences in the cellular response and signaling pathways between cisplatin and monodentate organometallic Ru(II) antitumor complexes containing a terphenyl ligand
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
247450
European Research Council - International
PubMed
21480648
DOI
10.1021/mp200105d
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Apoptosis drug effects MeSH
- Cell Cycle drug effects MeSH
- Cisplatin chemistry pharmacology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Cell Line, Tumor MeSH
- Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 metabolism MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents chemistry pharmacology MeSH
- Ruthenium chemistry pharmacology MeSH
- Terphenyl Compounds chemistry pharmacology MeSH
- Blotting, Western MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cisplatin MeSH
- Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents MeSH
- Ruthenium MeSH
- Terphenyl Compounds MeSH
The new monofunctional Ru(II)-arene complex [(η⁶-arene)Ru(II)(en)Cl]+, where en = 1,2-diaminoethane and the arene is para-terphenyl (complex 1) exhibits promising cytotoxic effects in human tumor cells including those resistant to conventional cisplatin (J. Med. Chem.2008, 51, 5310). The present study is focused on the cellular pharmacology of 1 to elucidate more deeply the mechanisms underlying its antitumor effects. We have identified several cellular mechanisms induced by 1 in human ovarian carcinoma cells, including inhibition of DNA synthesis, overexpression and activation of p53, expression of proapoptotic proteins p21(WAF1) and Bax, G₀/G₁ arrest, and nuclear fragmentation as a result of apoptotic, and, to a much lower extent, also necrotic processes. Thus, 1 inhibits growth of the cancer cells through induction of apoptotic cell death and G₀/G₁ cell cycle arrest. Further investigations have shown that 1 induces apoptosis by regulating the expression of Bcl-2 family proteins. There were significant differences in cellular responses to the treatment with 1 and with conventional cisplatin, particularly in the kinetics and the extent of these responses. In addition, the distinct p53 activation profile of 1 compared with cisplatin provides an explanation for the activity of this ruthenium drug against cisplatin-resistant cells. Hence complex 1 may provide an alternative therapy in patients with acquired cisplatin resistance, particularly with respect to its very low mutagenicity and different mode of action compared to platinum antitumor drugs in clinical use.
Mol Pharm. 2012 Mar 5;9(3):694 PubMed
References provided by Crossref.org