Immediate restoration with ti-unite implants: practice-based evidence compared with animal study outcomes
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Grant support
DE12696-01
NIDCR NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
21519565
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Dental Restoration, Temporary instrumentation MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous instrumentation methods MeSH
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Osseointegration MeSH
- Surface Properties MeSH
- Proportional Hazards Models MeSH
- Dental Prosthesis Retention instrumentation MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Dental Research methods MeSH
- Titanium MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Dental Implants * MeSH
- Evidence-Based Dentistry MeSH
- Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported instrumentation MeSH
- Denture, Partial, Temporary * MeSH
- Dental Prosthesis Design MeSH
- Dental Alloys MeSH
- Dental Restoration Failure MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Titanium MeSH
- titanium dioxide MeSH Browser
- Dental Implants * MeSH
- Dental Alloys MeSH
PURPOSE: Clinicians often do not have the benefit of adequate safety or clinical data when evaluating the merit of either newly marketed implant devices or novel clinical procedures. This has been the case for dental implants following the initial documentation of their safety and efficacy and is demonstrated in the evolution of immediate load application. Following demonstration of safety and successful application of an implant in an animal study prior to its market release, this report provides the clinical outcomes for the first 100 Ti-Unite implants provided to 24 patients in a clinical practice over 9 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic record/clinical database review of consecutive early loaded implants from a multiple surgeon/single prosthodontist practice was conducted for quality assurance. Data extraction of standard exposure and outcome variables was accomplished by a trained individual not affiliated with the clinical practice. RESULTS: The results revealed one failure before and none following definitive restoration with a variety of prostheses. The mean length of time from immediate to definitive restorations was 5.3 ± 1.1 months for crowns, 3.9 ± 1.3 months for fixed partial dentures, and 7.8 ± 4.1 months for mandibular "hybrid" prostheses. The most common unexpected findings during the initial three postinsertion visits were lost access restoration and cement failure. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-market animal data regarding the safety and success of a new implant used with an early loading protocol was replicated in the clinical results of the first 100 implants used in practice. Additionally, the clinical results are favorable when compared to conventional loading protocols from this same practice and provide helpful comparative metrics (delayed vs immediate loading) to use when discussing implant treatment with patients.