Sterilizing pathogens are commonly assumed not to affect longevity of infected individuals, and if they do then negatively. Examples abound, however, of species in which the absence of reproduction actually increases life expectancy. This happens because by decreasing the energy outlay on reproduction individuals with lowered reproduction can live longer. Alternatively, fertile individuals are more susceptible to predators or parasitoids if the latter can capitalize on mating signals of the former. Here we develop and analyze an SI epidemiological model to explore whether and to what extent does such a life expectancy prolongation due to sterilizing pathogens affect host dynamics. In particular, we are interested in an added value of increased life expectancy on the possibility of successful pest control, that is, the effect of increased lifespan and hence increased potential of the infected individuals to spread the disease on pest control effectiveness. We show that although the parameter range in which we observe an effect of increased lifespan of the sterilized individuals is not large, the effect itself can be significant. In particular, the increase in pest control effectiveness can be very dramatic when disease transmission efficiency is close to birth rate, mortality rate of susceptibles is relatively high (i.e., the species is relatively short-lived), and sterilization efficiency is relatively high. Our results thus characterize pathogens that are promising candidates for an effective pest control and that might possibly be engineered if not occurring naturally.

Department of Theoretical Ecology Institute of Entomology Biology Centre ASCR Branišovská 31 37005 České Budějovice Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Am Nat. 2009 Jan;173(1):72-88 PubMed

Reprod Fertil Dev. 1997;9(1):41-50 PubMed

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004 Aug;79(3):557-81 PubMed

Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jun 1;16(6):295-300 PubMed

J Insect Physiol. 1998 Feb;44(2):121-129 PubMed

J Math Biol. 1994;32(8):809-34 PubMed

Reprod Fertil Dev. 1996;8(4):655-60 PubMed

Math Biosci. 2002 Nov-Dec;180:29-48 PubMed

Reprod Fertil Dev. 1997;9(1):85-9 PubMed

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Aug;78(3):347-83 PubMed

Am Nat. 2006 Sep;168(3):281-93 PubMed

Am Nat. 2002 Jun;159(6):597-605 PubMed

Reprod Fertil Dev. 1994;6(3):281-7 PubMed

Reprod Fertil Dev. 1997;9(1):131-6 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 22;276(1661):1443-8 PubMed

J Insect Physiol. 2003 Sep;49(9):817-22 PubMed

J Math Biol. 1992;30(7):717-31 PubMed

J Math Biol. 1991;29(6):539-70 PubMed

Evolution. 1975 Jun;29(2):335-352 PubMed

Contraception. 2002 Apr;65(4):273-5 PubMed

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1996 Aug;71(3):415-71 PubMed

J Theor Biol. 2008 Jan 21;250(2):281-90 PubMed

Reprod Fertil Dev. 1997;9(1):111-6 PubMed

Nature. 1979 Aug 2;280(5721):361-7 PubMed

J Insect Physiol. 1997 Jun;43(6):501-512 PubMed