Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
21890488
PubMed Central
PMC3249219
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehr291
PII: ehr291
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary methods MeSH
- Bundle-Branch Block complications MeSH
- Longevity MeSH
- Electrocardiography MeSH
- Myocardial Infarction complications therapy MeSH
- Coronary Occlusion therapy MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Hospital Mortality MeSH
- Myocardial Reperfusion methods MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Practice Guidelines as Topic MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
AIMS: The current guidelines recommend reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with ST-segment elevation or left bundle branch block (LBBB). Surprisingly, the right bundle branch block (RBBB) is not listed as an indication for reperfusion therapy. This study analysed patients with AMI presenting with RBBB [with or without left anterior hemiblock (LAH) or left posterior hemiblock (LPH)] and compared them with those presenting with LBBB or with other electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns. The aim was to describe angiographic patterns and primary angioplasty use in AMI patients with RBBB. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 6742 patients with AMI admitted to eight participating hospitals was analysed. Baseline clinical characteristics, ECG patterns, coronary angiographic, and echocardiographic data were correlated with the reperfusion therapies used and with in-hospital outcomes. Right bundle branch block was present in 6.3% of AMI patients: 2.8% had RBBB alone, 3.2% had RBBB + LAH, and 0.3% had RBBB + LPH. TIMI flow 0 in the infarct-related artery was present in 51.7% of RBBB patients vs. 39.4% of LBBB patients (P = 0.023). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 80.1% of RBBB patients vs. 68.3% of LBBB patients (P< 0.001). In-hospital mortality of RBBB patients was similar to LBBB (14.3 vs. 13.1%, P = 0.661). Patients with new or presumably new blocks had the highest (LBBB 15.8% and RBBB 15.4%) incidence of cardiogenic shock from all ECG subgroups. Percutaneous coronary intervention was done more frequently (84.8%) in patients with new or presumably new RBBB when compared with other patients with blocks (old RBBB 66.0%, old LBBB 62.3%, new or presumably new LBBB 73.0%). In-hospital mortality was highest (18.8%) among patients presenting with new or presumably new RBBB, followed by new or presumably new LBBB (13.2%), old LBBB (10.1%), and old RBBB (6.4%). Among 35 patients with acute left main coronary artery occlusion, 26% presented with RBBB (mostly with LAH) on the admission ECG. CONCLUSION: Acute myocardial infarction with RBBB is frequently caused by the complete occlusion of the infarct-related artery and is more frequently treated with primary PCI when compared with AMI + LBBB. In-hospital mortality of patients with AMI and RBBB is highest from all ECG presentations of AMI. Restoration of coronary flow by primary PCI may lead to resolution of the conduction delay on the discharge ECG. Right bundle branch block should strongly be considered for listing in future guidelines as a standard indication for reperfusion therapy, in the same way as LBBB.
See more in PubMed
Ross JC, Dunning AJ. Right bundle branch and left axis deviation in acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1970;32:847–851. PubMed PMC
Wong CK, Stewart RAH, Gao W, French JK, Raffel C, White HD for the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO-2) Trial Investigators. Prognostic differences between different types of bundle branch block during the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: insights from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:21–28. PubMed
Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fox K, Huber K, Kastrati A, Rosengren A, Steg PG, Tubaro M, Verheugt F, Weidinger F, Weis M, Vahanian A, Camm J, De Caterina R, Dean V, Dickstein K, Funck-Brentano C, Hellemans I, Kristensen SD, McGregor K, Sechtem U, Silber S, Tendera M, Widimsky P, Zamorano JL, Aguirre FV, Al-Attar N, Alegria E, Andreotti F, Benzer W, Breithardt O, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Dudek D, Gulba D, Halvorsen S, Kaufmann P, Kornowski R, Lip GY, Rutten F. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2909–2945. PubMed
Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Ornato JP, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC, Jr, Alpert JS, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Gregoratos G, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:671–719. PubMed
Gould L, Venkataraman K, Mohhamad N, Gomprecht RF. Prognosis of right bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1972;219:502–503. PubMed
Terkelsen CJ, Lassen JF, Nørgaard BL, Gerdes JC, Jensen T, Gøtzsche LB, Nielsen TT, Andersen HR. Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected cohort. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:18–26. PubMed
Dubois C, Pierard LA, Smeets JP, Foidart G, Legrand V, Kulbertus HE. Short and long-term prognostic importance of complete bundle-branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol. 1988;11:292–296. PubMed
Melgarejo-Moreno A, Galcerá-Tomás J, Garcia-Alberola A, Valdés-Chavarri M, Castillo-Soria FJ, Mira-Sánchez E, Gil-Sánchez J, Allegue-Gallego J. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic significance of right bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction. A study in the thrombolytic era. Circulation. 1997;96:1139–1144. PubMed
American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and managent of adult patients presenting with suspected acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35:521–544. PubMed
GISSI (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto miocardico) Effectivness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1986;1:397–402. PubMed
ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of intraveous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither among 17 187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet. 1988;2:349–360. PubMed
Widimský P, Hlinomaz O, Kala P, Jirmář R. Diagnostika a léčba akutního infarktu myokardu s elevacemi ST. Cor Vasa. 2009;51:724–740.
Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet. 1994;343:311–322. PubMed
Newby KH, Pisano E, Krucoff MW, Green C, Natale A. Incidence and clinical relevance of the occurrence of bundle-branch block in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy. Circulation. 1996;94:2424–2428. PubMed
Kurisu S, Inoue I, Kawagoe T, Ishihara M, Shimatani Y, Hata T, Nakama Y, Kijima Y, Kagawa E. Right bundle-branch block in anterior acute myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era: acute angiographic findings and prognosis. Int J Cardiol. 2007;116:57–61. PubMed
Kleemann T, Juenger C, Gitt AK, Schiele R, Schneider S, Senges J, Darius H, Seidl K MITRA PLUS Study Group. Incidence and clinical impact of right bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction: ST elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2008;156:256–261. PubMed
Sakakura K, Kubo N, Hashimoto S, Ikeda N, Funayama H, Hirahara T, Sugawara Y, Yasu T, Ako J, Kawakami M, Momomura S. Determinants of in-hospital death in left main coronary artery myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. J Cardiol. 2008;52:24–29. PubMed
Hirano T, Tsuchiya K, Nishigaki K, Sou K, Kubota T, Ojio S, Kawasaki M, Minatoguchi S, Fujiwara H, Ueno K, Hosokawa H, Morita N, Nagano T, Suzuki T, Watanabe S. Clinical features of emergency electrocardiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction caused by left main trunk obstruction. Circ J. 2006;70:525–529. PubMed
Kurisu S, Inoue I, Kawagoe T, Ishihara M, Shimatani Y, Nakamura S, Yoshida M, Mitsuba N, Hata T. Electrocardiographic features in patients with acute myocardial infarction associated with left main coronary artery occlusion. Heart. 2004;90:1059–1060. PubMed PMC
Guerrero M, Harjai K, Stone GW, Brodie B, Cox D, Boura J, Grines L, O'Neill W, Grines C. Comparison of the prognostic effect of left versus right versus no bundle branch block on presenting electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty in the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:482–488. PubMed
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2525–2538. PubMed
Di Chiara A. Right bundle branch block during the acute phase of myocardial infarction: modern redefinitions of old concepts. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1–2. PubMed
Gussak I, Wright RS, Kopecky SL. Should we revise our diagnostic methods for Q-wave myocardial infarction in the presence of right bundle branch block? Am Heart J. 2000;140:10–11. PubMed
Gussak I, Zhou SH, Rautaharju P, Bjerregaard P, Stocke K, Osada N, Yokoyama Y, Miller M, Islam S, Chaitman BR. Right bundle branch block as a cause of false-negative ECG classification of inferior myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 1999;32:279–284. PubMed
Rosenbaum MB, Girotti LA, Lazzari O, Halpern MS, Elizari MV. Abnormal Q waves in right sided chest leads provoked by onset of right bundle branch block in patients with anteroseptal infarction. Br Heart J. 1982;47:227–232. PubMed PMC