A comparison of POPs bioaccumulation in Eisenia fetida in natural and artificial soils and the effects of aging
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
22035925
DOI
10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.049
PII: S0269-7491(11)00501-X
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- látky znečišťující půdu chemie metabolismus toxicita MeSH
- Oligochaeta chemie účinky léků metabolismus MeSH
- organické látky chemie metabolismus toxicita MeSH
- půda chemie MeSH
- uhlík analýza MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- látky znečišťující půdu MeSH
- organické látky MeSH
- půda MeSH
- uhlík MeSH
The close relationship between soil organic matter and the bioavailability of POPs in soils suggests the possibility of using it for the extrapolation between different soils. The aim of this study was to prove that TOC content is not a single factor affecting the bioavailability of POPs and that TOC based extrapolation might be incorrect, especially when comparing natural and artificial soils. Three natural soils with increasing TOC and three artificial soils with TOC comparable to these natural soils were spiked with phenanthrene, pyrene, lindane, p,p'-DDT, and PCB 153 and studied after 0, 14, 28, and 56 days. At each sampling point, total soil concentration and bioaccumulation in earthworms Eisenia fetida were measured. The results showed different behavior and bioavailability of POPs in natural and artificial soils and apparent effects of aging on these differences. Hence, direct TOC based extrapolation between various soils seems to be limited.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org