Determination of the strength of adhesion between lipid vesicles
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
22312321
PubMed Central
PMC3261509
DOI
10.1100/2012/146804
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adhesiveness MeSH
- Biomechanical Phenomena MeSH
- Cytoplasmic Vesicles chemistry physiology MeSH
- Lipids chemistry physiology MeSH
- Stress, Mechanical MeSH
- Membranes chemistry physiology MeSH
- Microscopy, Phase-Contrast MeSH
- Observer Variation MeSH
- Shear Strength physiology MeSH
- Models, Statistical MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Lipids MeSH
A commonly used method to determine the strength of adhesion between adhering lipid vesicles is measuring their effective contact angle from experimental images. The aim of this paper is to estimate the interobserver variations in vesicles effective contact angle measurements and to propose a new method for estimating the strength of membrane vesicle adhesion. Theoretical model shows for the old and for the new measure a monotonic dependence on the strength of adhesion. Results obtained by both measuring techniques show statistically significant correlation and high interobserver reliability for both methods. Therefore the conventional method of measuring the effective contact angle gives qualitatively relevant results as the measure of the lipid vesicle adhesion. However, the new measuring technique provides a lower variation of the measured values than the conventional measures using the effective contact angle. Moreover, obtaining the adhesion angle can be automatized more easily than obtaining the effective contact angle.
See more in PubMed
Chernomordik LV, Kozlov MM. Mechanics of membrane fusion. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology. 2008;15(7):675–683. PubMed PMC
Chen EH, Grote E, Mohler W, Vignery A. Cell-cell fusion. FEBS Letters. 2007;581(11):2181–2193. PubMed
Blumenthal R, Clague MJ, Durell SR, Epand RM. Membrane fusion. Chemical Reviews. 2003;103(1):53–69. PubMed
Sun Y, Lee CC, Huang HW. Adhesion and merging of lipid bilayers: a method for measuring the free energy of adhesion and hemifusion. Biophysical Journal. 2011;100(4):987–995. PubMed PMC
Seifert U. Configurations of fluid membranes and vesicles. Advances in Physics. 1997;46(1):13–137.
Das S, Du Q. Adhesion of vesicles to curved substrates. Physical Review E. 2008;77(1) Article ID 011907. PubMed
Schönherr H, Johnson JM, Lenz P, Frank CW, Boxer SG. Vesicle adsorption and lipid bilayer formation on glass studied by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir. 2004;20(26):11600–11606. PubMed
Lasic D. Structure and Dynamics of Membranes. New York, NY, USA: Elsevier; 1995.
Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 5th edition. Garland Science; 2007.
Janša R, Šuštar V, Frank M, et al. Number of microvesicles in peripheral blood and ability of plasma to induce adhesion between phospholipid membranes in 19 patients with gastrointestinal diseases. Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases. 2008;41(1):124–132. PubMed
Frank M, Manček-Keber M, Kržan M, et al. Prevention of microvesiculation by adhesion of buds to the mother cell membrane—a possible anticoagulant effect of healthy donor plasma. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2008;7(3):240–245. PubMed
Frank M, Sodin-Šemrl S, Rozman B, Potočnik M, Kralj-Iglič V. Effects of low-molecular-weight heparin on adhesion and vesiculation of phospholipid membranes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009;1173(1):874–886. PubMed
Šuštar V, Janša R, Frank M, et al. Suppression of membrane microvesiculation—a possible anticoagulant and anti-tumor progression effect of heparin. Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases. 2009;42(3):223–227. PubMed
Urbanija J, Tomšič N, Lokar M, et al. Coalescence of phospholipid membranes as a possible origin of anticoagulant effect of serum proteins. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. 2007;150(1):49–57. PubMed
Junkar I, Šuštar V, Frank M, et al. Blood and synovial microparticles as revealed by atomic force and scanning electron microscope. Open Autoimmunity Journal. 2009;1(1):50–58.
Lee TH, D'Asti E, Magnus N, Al-Nedawi K, Meehan B, Rak J. Microvesicles as mediators of intercellular communication in cancer—the emerging science of cellular “debris”. Seminars in Immunopathology. 2011;33(5):455–467. PubMed
Šuštar V, Zavec AB, Štukelj R, et al. Nanoparticles isolated from blood: a reflection of vesiculability of blood cells during the isolation process. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2011;6:2737–2748. PubMed PMC
Helfrich W. Elastic properties of lipid bilayers: theory and possible experiments. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung. 1973;28(11):693–703. PubMed
Seifert U, Lipowsky R. Adhesion of vesicles. Physical Review A. 1990;42(8):4768–4771. PubMed
Duwe H, Kaes J, Sackmann E. Bending elastic moduli of lipid bilayers: modulation by solutes. Journal de Physique. 1990;51(10):945–961.
Rasband W. ImageJ—image processing and analysis in java. 1997.
Brakke K. The surface evolver. 1991.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin. 1979;86(2):420–428. PubMed
Schoonjans F, Zalata A, Depuydt CE, Comhaire FH. MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 1995;48(3):257–262. PubMed