The relationship between family socioeconomic condition and childhood injury frequency in selected locations in the Czech Republic
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
22367135
PubMed Central
PMC3560742
DOI
10.12659/msm.882508
PII: 882508
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- rány a poranění epidemiologie MeSH
- společenská třída * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Childhood injury rates are monitored worldwide because they markedly affect morbidity and mortality of children. There are numerous works that point out the relationship between family socioeconomic status and injuries, where lower socioeconomic levels are linked to higher numbers of injuries. MATERIAL/METHODS: The goal of this work was to evaluate the relationship between family socioeconomic status and childhood injuries in the Czech Republic. The research was carried out between 1/7/2009 and 31/12/2010. A 2-part questionnaire was used to gather information. The first part, "Injury/poisoning of children," included information on the injury itself; the second part, "Family functionality," concerned family socioeconomic situations. We collected a total of 874 questionnaires in the South-Bohemian region and 132 questionnaires from a selected county in the North-Bohemian region. A database identical with the questionnaire assignment was established, comprising all the data accumulated. RESULTS: The injury rate in families living in poor socioeconomic situations in locality 8 was statistically significantly higher compared to families in good socioeconomic situations. The number of home injuries was 205. Families with incomes that were twice the subsistence level had more child protective measures in their households. There was a statistically significant relationship between the number of child protective measures and injury frequency in families. Children in families having higher incomes (twice that of subsistence level) were more likely to suffer injuries related to organized sports as compared to those in families having lower incomes. CONCLUSIONS: The literature and research data show that preventive programs have the largest effect on reduction in childhood morbidity and mortality with respect to injuries.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Peden M, et al., editors. World report on child injury prevention. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
Blažek K, Vitošová A, Průchová D, Lavičková M. Selected external effects and types of child injuries in the České Budějovice county. Prevence úrazů, otrav a násilí. 2011;6:141–53. [in Czech]
Truellová I. Prevention of child injuries in activity of practitioners taking medical care of children and youth. Prevence úrazů, otrav a násilí. 2009;5:103–16. [in Czech]
Dunovský J. The child and disorders in the family. 1st ed. [Dítě a poruchy rodiny]. Praha: Avicenum; 1986. [in Czech]
Čapková M, Toráčová L, Velemínský M. Prevention of injuries in selected age groups of population. 1st ed. [Prevence úrazů u vybraných věkových skupin obyvatelstva]. Praha: Triton; 2008. [in Czech]
Hintze J. NCSS, PASS, and GESS. NCSS; Kaysville, Utah, USA: 2007.
Contingency tables analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 400 for Windows. GraphPad Software; San Diego California USA: 2003.
StatSoft Inc. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 9.1. 2010.
Hutton D. Vulnerability of children: more than a question of age. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;142:54–57. PubMed
Faelker T, Pickett W, Brison RJ. Socioeconomic differences in childhood injury: a population based epidemiologic in Ontario, Canada. J Injury Prevention. 2000;6:203–8. PubMed PMC
Sridharan L, Crandall M. Injury and health among children in vulnerable families. J Trauma. 2011;70:1539–45. PubMed
Kendrick D, Mulvaney C, Buton P, Watson M. Relationships between child, family and neighborhood characteristics and childhood injury: a cohort study. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(9):1905–15. PubMed
Kendrick D, Mulvaney C, Watson M. Does targeting injury prevention towards families in disadvantaged areas reduce inequalities in safety practices? J Health Education Research. 2009;24:32–42. PubMed
Alexandrescu R, O’Brien SJ, Lecky FE. A review of injury epidemiology in the UK and Europe: some methodological considerations in constructing rates. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:226. PubMed PMC
Poulos R, Hayen A, Finch C, Zwi A. Area socioeconomic status and childhood injury morbidity in New South Wales, Australia. J Injury Prevention. 2007;13:322–27. PubMed PMC
Ramsay LJ, Moreton G, Gorman DR, et al. Unintentional home injury in preschool-aged children: looking for the key – an exploration of the inter-relationship and relative importance of potential risk factors. J SourcePublic Health. 2003;117:404–11. PubMed
Morrongiello BA, House K. Measuring parent attributes and supervision behaviors relevant to child injury risk: examining the usefulness of questionnaire measures. Injury Prevention. 2004;10:114–18. PubMed PMC
McKenzie LB, Leventhal T, Gielen AC, Guyer B. Risk factors for unintentional injuries in children: Are grandparents protective? J Pediatrics. 2008;122:980–87. PubMed
Laursen B, Nielsen JW. Influence of sociodemographic factors on the risk of unintentional childhood home injuries. Eur J Public Health. 2008;18:366–70. PubMed
Villalba-Cota J, Trujillo-Hernandez B, Vasquez C, et al. Causes of accidents in children aged 0–14 years and risk factors related to the family environment. Ann TropPaediatr. 2004;24:53–57. PubMed
Rogmans W. Education and legislation are keys to preventing child injuries. World Health Organization. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87:334–36. PubMed PMC
Grivna M. Child injuries and possibilities of their prevention. 1st ed. [Dětské úrazy a možnosti jejich prevence]. Praha: Centrum úrazové prevence UK 2. LF a FN Motol; 2003. [in Czech]
Grivna M, Čelko AM, Benešová V. Perspectives of child injury prevention in the Czech Republic. J Čes.-slov Pediat. 2006;61:374–78. [in Czech]
Benešová V, Krejčí F, Grivna M, et al. Monitoring of child injuries in selected regions. J Čes.-slov Pediat. 2007;62:371–75. [in Czech]
Janoušek S, Zvadová Z, Roth Z. Socioeconomic conditioning of child traffic injury frequency. J Čes.-slov Pediat. 2007;62:123–32. [in Czech]
Čapková M, Velemínský M. Zdravotně sociální problematika. 1st ed. Praha: Triton; 2005. Drowning and injuries associated with water. [in Czech]
Tošovský V. Let us protect children from injuries: Prevention of injuries in the children and youth. [Chraňme děti před úrazy: prevence úrazů dětí a mládeže]. Praha: Alfa-Omega; 2006. [in Czech]
Family Affluence and the Eating Habits of 11- to 15-Year-Old Czech Adolescents: HBSC 2002 and 2014