Differential patterns of food appreciation during consumption of a simple food in congenitally anosmic individuals: an explorative study
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
22529901
PubMed Central
PMC3329520
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0033921
PII: PONE-D-11-01587
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Olfactory Perception * MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Olfaction Disorders psychology MeSH
- Food Preferences psychology MeSH
- Pleasure MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Food is evaluated for various attributes. One of the key food evaluation domains is hedonicity. As food is consumed, its hedonic valence decreases (due to prolonged sensory stimulation) and hedonic habituation results. The aim of the present study was to investigate changes in food pleasantness ratings during consumption of a simple food by individuals without olfactory experience with food as compared to normosmics. 15 congenital anosmics and 15 normosmic controls were each presented with ten 10 g banana slices. Each was visually inspected, then smelled and chewed for ten seconds and subsequently rated for hedonicity on a 21-point scale. There was a significant difference in pleasantness ratings between congenital anosmics and controls (F(1, 26) = 6.71, p = .02) with the anosmics exhibiting higher ratings than the controls, a significant main repeated-measures effect on the ratings (F(1.85, 48) = 12.15, p<.001), which showed a decreasing trend over the course of consumption, as well as a significant portion*group interaction (F(1.85, 48) = 3.54, p = .04), with the anosmic participants experiencing a less pronounced decline. The results of the present explorative study suggest that over the course of consumption of a simple food, congenitally anosmic individuals experience differential patterns of appreciation of food as compared to normosmics. In this particular case, the decrease of hedonic valence was less pronounced in congenital anosmics.
See more in PubMed
Lawless HT, Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1998. 827
Kringelbach ML. Food for thought: Hedonic experience beyond homeostasis in the human brain. Neuroscience. 2004;126:807–819. PubMed
Gottfried JA, Dolan RJ. The nose smells what the eye sees: Crossmodal visual facilitation of human olfactory perception. Neuron. 2003;39:375–386. PubMed
Morrot G, Brochet F, Dubourdieu D. The color of odors. Brain Lang. 2001;79:309–320. PubMed
Stevenson RJ. An Initial Evaluation of the Functions of Human Olfaction. Chem Senses. 2010;35:3–20. PubMed
Yeomans MR. Understanding individual differences in acquired flavour liking in humans. Chem Percept. 2009;3:34–41.
Mela DJ. Eating for pleasure or just wanting to eat? Reconsidering sensory hedonic responses as a driver of obesity. Appetite. 2006;47:10–17. PubMed
Zandstra EH, de Graaf C, van Trijp HCM, van Staveren WA. Laboratory hedonic ratings as predictors of consumption. Food Qual Pref. 1999;10:411–418.
Yeomans MR. Palatability and the microstructure of feeding in humans: The appetizer effect. Appetite. 1996;27:119–133. PubMed
Hetherington M, Rolls BJ, Burley VJ. The time course of sensory-specific satiety. Appetite. 1989;12:57–68. PubMed
Blundell J, de Graaf C, Hulshof T, Jebb S, Livingstone B, et al. Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods. Obes Rev. 2010;11:251–270. PubMed PMC
Weijzen PL, Smeets PA, de Graaf C. Sip size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation. Br J Nutr. 2009;102:1091–1097. PubMed
Zijlstra N, de Wijk RA, Mars M, Stafleu A, de Graaf C. Effect of bite size and oral processing time of a semisolid food on satiation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90:269–275. PubMed
Ruijschop RM, Boelrijk AE, Burgering MJ, de Graaf C, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Acute effects of complexity in aroma composition on satiation and food intake. Chem Senses. 2010;35:91–100. PubMed
Vickers Z, Holton EWJ. Effect of ideal–relative sweetness on yogurt consumption. Food Qual Prefer. 2001;12:521–526.
Rolls BJ, Rolls ET, Rowe EA, Sweeney K. Sensory specific satiety in man. Physiol & Behav. 1981;27:137–142. PubMed
Rolls ET, Rolls JH. Olfactory sensory-specific satiety in humans. Physiol & Behav. 1997;61:461–473. PubMed
de Graaf C. Sensory responses, food intake and obesity. In: Mela D, editor. Food, diet and obesity. Cambridge: Woodhead publishing Ltd; 2005. pp. 137–159.
Mattes RD, Cowart BJ, Schiavo MA, Arnold C, Garrison B, et al. Dietary evaluation of patients with smell and taste disorders. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51:233–240. PubMed
Aschenbrenner K, Scholze N, Joraschky P, Hummel T. Gustatory and olfactory sensitivity in patients with anorexia and bulimia in the course of treatment. J Psychiatric Res. 2008;43:129–137. PubMed
Temmel AFP, Quint C, Schickinger-Fischer B, Klimek L, Stoller E, et al. Characteristics of olfactory disorders in relation to major causes of olfactory loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:635–641. PubMed
Ferris AM, Duffy VB. Effect of olfactory deficits on nutritional status – does age predict persons at risk. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1989;561:113–123. PubMed
Nordin S, Bramerson A, Blomqvist EH. Consequences of olfactory dysfunction for life quality and adopted coping mechanisms. Int J Psychol. 2000;35:108.
Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Costanzo RM, DiNardo LJ, et al. Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:497–503. PubMed
Van Toller S. Assessing the impact of anosmia: review of a questionnaire's findings. Chem Senses. 1999;24:705–712. PubMed
Davidson TM, Jalowayski A, Murphy C, Jacobs RD. Evaluation and treatment of smell dysfunction. West J Med. 1987;146:434–438. PubMed PMC
Henion KE. Odor pleasantness and intensity – single dimension. J Exp Psychol. 1971;90:275–279. PubMed
de Araujo IET, Rolls ET, Kringelbach ML, McGlone F, Phillips N. Taste-olfactory convergence, and the representation of the pleasantness of flavour, in the human brain. Eur J Neursci. 2003;18:2059–2068. PubMed
Havermans RC, Hermanns J, Jansen A. Eating without a nose: Olfactory dysfunction and sensory-specific satiety. Chem Senses. 2010;35:735–41. PubMed
Steiner JE, Glaser D, Hawilo ME, Berridge KC. Comparative expression of hedonic impact: Affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001;25:53–74. PubMed