Vasa vasorum quantification in human varicose great and small saphenous veins
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Case Reports, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
22559999
DOI
10.1016/j.aanat.2012.02.019
PII: S0940-9602(12)00049-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Algorithms MeSH
- Anisotropy MeSH
- Endothelium, Vascular pathology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Immunohistochemistry MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Microvessels pathology MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Varicose Veins pathology MeSH
- Vasa Vasorum pathology MeSH
- Saphenous Vein pathology MeSH
- von Willebrand Factor metabolism MeSH
- Vascular Surgical Procedures MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Case Reports MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- von Willebrand Factor MeSH
Recent research regarding saphenous vasa vasorum (VV) has focused on two main topics: the VV during varicogenesis in chronic venous insufficiency and the VV in saphenous grafts used in reconstructive vascular surgery. Our aim has been (i) to establish a technique for the histological quantification of the VV in human varicose great and small saphenous veins and (ii) to describe the density and distribution of the vasa vasorum within varicose veins. Great (n=11) and small (n=5) saphenous veins (length, 15-40cm) were collected from 12 patients who were undergoing venous stripping due to chronic venous insufficiency (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology class 2-3). The veins were divided into 5-cm long segments. In total, 92 tissue blocks were collected to trace the variability of the density and distribution of the vasa vasorum in the proximo-distal direction. The endothelium was detected by immunohistochemistry using the von Willebrand factor. We quantified the number of microvessel profiles per section area and the relative distance of the microvessels from the outer border of the adventitia. The VV did not exhibit a preferential orientation in the varicose veins. VV density profiles were highest in the middle third of the venous wall and lowest in the inner third of the venous wall. Both the density and distribution of VV were uniform along the veins, and no differences were observed between the great and small saphenous veins. The VV density was statistically independent of the relative distance from the adventitia. The usability of this technique for perioperative frozen sections remains to be tested.
References provided by Crossref.org