Sperm-related phenotypes implicated in both maintenance and breakdown of a natural species barrier in the house mouse
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
PubMed
23055063
PubMed Central
PMC3497091
DOI
10.1098/rspb.2012.1802
PII: rspb.2012.1802
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Y Chromosome * MeSH
- Species Specificity MeSH
- Phenotype MeSH
- Hybridization, Genetic * MeSH
- Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide MeSH
- Models, Genetic MeSH
- Mice physiology MeSH
- Selection, Genetic MeSH
- Spermatozoa physiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Mice physiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
The house mouse hybrid zone (HMHZ) is a species barrier thought to be maintained by a balance between dispersal and natural selection against hybrids. While the HMHZ is characterized by frequency discontinuities for some sex chromosome markers, there is an unexpected large-scale regional introgression of a Y chromosome across the barrier, in defiance of Haldane's rule. Recent work suggests that a major force maintaining the species barrier acts through sperm traits. Here, we test whether the Y chromosome penetration of the species barrier acts through sperm traits by assessing sperm characteristics of wild-caught males directly in a field laboratory set up in a Y introgression region of the HMHZ, later calculating the hybrid index of each male using 1401 diagnostic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We found that both sperm count (SC) and sperm velocity were significantly reduced across the natural spectrum of hybrids. However, SC was more than rescued in the presence of the invading Y. Our results imply an asymmetric advantage for Y chromosome introgression consistent with the observed large-scale introgression. We suggest that selection on sperm-related traits probably explains a large component of patterns observed in the natural hybrid zone, including the Y chromosome penetration.
See more in PubMed
Abbot R., et al. In press Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol.10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x) PubMed DOI
Coyne J. A., Orr H. A. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates
Tucker P. K., Sage R. D., Warner J., Wilson A. C., Eicher E. M. 1992. Abrupt cline for sex chromosomes in a hybrid zone between two species of mice. Evolution 46, 1146–116310.2307/2409762 (doi:10.2307/2409762) PubMed DOI
Dod B., Jermiin L. S., Boursot P., Chapman V. H., Nielsen J. T., Bonhomme F. 1993. Counterselection on sex chromosomes in the Mus musculus European hybrid zone. J. Evol. Biol. 6, 529–54610.1046/j.1420-9101.1993.6040529.x (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1993.6040529.x) DOI
Macholán M., Munclinger P., Šugerková M., Dufková P., Bímová B., Božíková E., Zima J., Piálek J. 2007. Genetic analysis of autosomal and X-linked markers across a mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 61, 746–77110.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00065.x (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00065.x) PubMed DOI
Macholán M., Baird S. J. E., Munclinger P., Dufková P., Bímová B., Piálek J. 2008. Genetic conflict outweighs heterogametic incompatibility in the mouse hybrid zone? BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 271–28410.1186/1471-2148-8-271 (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-271) PubMed DOI PMC
Macholán M., Baird S. J. E., Dufková P., Munclinger P., Vošlajerová Bímová B., Piálek J. 2011. Assessing multilocus introgression patterns: a case study on the mouse X chromosome in Central Europe . Evolution 65, 1428–144610.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01228.x (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01228.x) PubMed DOI
Teeter K. C., et al. 2008. Genome-wide patterns of gene flow across a house mouse hybrid zone. Genome Res. 18, 67–7610.1101/gr.6757907 (doi:10.1101/gr.6757907) PubMed DOI PMC
Teeter K. C., Thibodeau L. M., Gompert Z., Buerkle C. A., Nachman M. W., Tucker P. K. 2010. The variable genomic architecture of isolation between hybridizing species of house mice. Evolution 64, 472–48510.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00846.x (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00846.x) PubMed DOI
Wang L., et al. 2011. Measures of linkage disequilibrium among neighboring SNPs indicate asymmetries across the house mouse hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 20, 2985–300010.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05148.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05148.x) PubMed DOI
Boursot P., Auffrey J. C., Britton-Davidian J., Bonhomme F. 1993. The evolution of house mice. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 119–15210.1146/annurev.ecolsys.24.1.119 (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.24.1.119) DOI
Jones E. P., Van Der Kooij J., Solheim R., Searle J. B. 2010. Norwegian house mice (Mus musculus musculus/domesticus): distributions, routes of colonization and patterns of hybridization. Mol. Ecol. 19, 5252–526410.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04874.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04874.x) PubMed DOI
Payseur B. A., Krenz J. G., Nachman M. W. 2004. Differential patterns of introgression across the X chromosome in a hybrid zone between two species of house mouse. Evolution 58, 2064–207810.1554/03-738 (doi:10.1554/03-738) PubMed DOI
Dufková P., Macholán M., Piálek J. 2011. Inference of selection and stochastic effects in the house mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 65, 993–101010.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01222.x (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01222.x) PubMed DOI
Turner L. M., Schwahn D. J., Harr B. 2012. Reduced male fertility in common but highly variable in form and severity in a natural house mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 66, 443–45810.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01445.x (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01445.x) PubMed DOI
Dobzhansky T. 1936. Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21, 113–135 PubMed PMC
Muller H. J. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6, 71–125
Fisher R. A. 1954. A fuller theory of ‘junctions’ in inbreeding. Heredity 8, 187–19710.1038/hdy.1954.17 (doi:10.1038/hdy.1954.17) DOI
Baird S. J. E. 2006. Fisher's markers of admixture. Heredity 97, 81–8310.1038/sj.hdy.6800850 (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800850) PubMed DOI
Hewitt G. M. 1988. Hybrid zones-natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 158–16710.1016/0169-5347(88)90033-X (doi:10.1016/0169-5347(88)90033-X) PubMed DOI
Vošlajerová Bímová B., et al. 2011. Reinforcement selection acting on the European house mouse hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 20, 2403–242410.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05106.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05106.x) PubMed DOI
Baird S. J. E., Ribas A., Macholán M., Albrecht T., Piálek J., Goüy de Bellocq J. 2012. Where are the wormy mice? A re-examination of hybrid parasitism in the European house mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 66, 2757–277210.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01633.x (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01633.x) PubMed DOI
Sage R. D., Heyneman D., Lim K. C., Wilson A. C. 1986. Wormy mice in a hybrid zone. Nature 324, 60–6210.1038/324060a0 (doi:10.1038/324060a0) PubMed DOI
Moulia C., Aussel J. P., Bonhomme F., Boursot P., Nielsen J. T., Renaud D. 1991. Wormy mice in a hybrid zone: a genetic control of susceptibility to parasite infection. J. Evol. Biol. 4, 679–68710.1046/j.1420-9101.1991.4040679.x (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1991.4040679.x) DOI
Britton-Davidian J., Fel-Clair F., Lopez J., Alibert P., Boursot P. 2005. Postzygotic isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse: estimates from fertility patterns in wild and laboratory-bred hybrids. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84, 379–39310.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00441.x (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00441.x) DOI
Alibert P., Fel-Clair F., Manolakou K., Britton-Davidian J., Auffray J. C. 1997. Developmental stability, fitness, and trait size in laboratory hybrids between European subspecies of the house mouse. Evolution 51, 1284–129510.2307/2411057 (doi:10.2307/2411057) PubMed DOI
Debat V., Alibert P., David P., Paradis E., Auffray J. C. 2000. Independence between developmental stability and canalization in the skull of the house mouse. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 423–43010.1098/rspb.2000.1017 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1017) PubMed DOI PMC
Mikula O., Auffray J. C., Macholán M. 2010. Asymmetric size and shape variation in the Central European transect across the house mouse hybrid zone. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 101, 13–2710.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01490.x (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01490.x) DOI
Haldane J. B. S. 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12, 101–10910.1007/BF02983075 (doi:10.1007/BF02983075) DOI
Calvel P., Rolland A. D., Jegou B., Pineau C. 2010. Testicular postgenomics: targeting the regulation of spermatogenesis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 1481–150010.1098/rstb.2009.0294 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0294) PubMed DOI PMC
Immler S., Hamilton M. B., Poslusny N. J., Birkhead T. R., Epifanio J. M. 2011. Post-mating reproductive barriers in two unidirectionally hybridizing sunfish (Centrarchidae: Lepomis). J. Evol. Biol. 24, 111–12010.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02142.x (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02142.x) PubMed DOI
Dean M. D., Ardlie K. G., Nachman M. W. 2006. The frequency of multiple paternity suggests that sperm competition is common in house mice (Mus domesticus). Mol. Ecol. 15, 4141–415110.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03068.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03068.x) PubMed DOI PMC
Howard D. J., Palumbi S. R., Birge L. M., Manier M. K. 2009. Sperm and speciation. In Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective (eds Birkhead T. R., Hosken D. J., Pitnick S.), pp. 367–403 Oxford, UK: Academic Press
Pizzari T., Parker G. A. 2009. Sperm competition and sperm phenotype. In Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective (eds Birkhead T. R., Hosken D. J., Pitnick S.), pp. 207–245 Oxford, UK: Academic Press
Kleven O., Fossøy F., Laskemoen T., Robertson R. J., Rudolfsen G., Lifjeld J. T. 2009. Comparative evidence for the evolution of sperm swimming speed by sperm competition and female sperm storage duration in passerine birds. Evolution 63, 2466–247310.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00725.x (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00725.x) PubMed DOI
Vyskočilová M., Pražanová G., Piálek J. 2009. Polymorphism in hybrid male sterility in wild-derived Mus musculus musculus strains on proximal chromosome 17. Mamm. Genome 20, 83–9110.1007/s00335-008-9164-3 (doi:10.1007/s00335-008-9164-3) PubMed DOI
Munclinger P., Božíková E., Šugerková M., Piálek J., Macholán M. 2002. Genetic variation in house mice (Mus, Muridae, Rodentia) from the Czech and Slovak Republics. Folia Zool. 51, 81–92
Schielzeth H. 2010. Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 103–11310.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00012.x (doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00012.x) DOI
R Development Core Team 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, reference index v. 2.13.1. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
Nelder J. A., Wedderburn R. W. M. 1972. Generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 135, 370–38410.2307/2344614 (doi:10.2307/2344614) DOI
Crawley M. J. 2007. The R book. Chichester, UK: Wiley
Raufaste N., Orth A., Belkhir K., Senet D., Smadja C., Baird S. J. E., Bonhomme F., Dod B., Boursot P. 2005. Inferences of selection and migration in the Danish house mouse hybrid zone. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84, 593–61610.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00457.x (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00457.x) DOI
Virdee S. R., Hewitt G. M. 1994. Clines for hybrid dysfunction in a grasshopper hybrid zone. Evolution 48, 392–40710.2307/2410100 (doi:10.2307/2410100) PubMed DOI
Vyskočilová M., Trachtulec Z., Forejt J., Piálek J. 2005. Does geography matter in hybrid sterility in house mice? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84, 663–67410.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00463.x (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00463.x) DOI
Good J. M., Handel M. A., Nachman M. W. 2008. Asymmetry and polymorphism of hybrid male sterility during the early stages of speciation in house mice. Evolution 62, 50–6510.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00257.x (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00257.x) PubMed DOI PMC
Forejt J., Iványi P. 1974. Genetic studies on male sterility of hybrids between laboratory and wild mice (Mus musculus L.). Genet. Res. 24, 189–20610.1017/S0016672300015214 (doi:10.1017/S0016672300015214) PubMed DOI
Birkhead T. R., Martínez J. G., Burke T., Froman D. P. 1999. Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1759–176410.1098/rspb.1999.0843 (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0843) PubMed DOI PMC
Birkhead T. R., Hosken D. J., Pitnick S. 2009. Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Oxford, UK: Academic Press
Gomendio M., Martin-Coello J., Crespo C., Magana C., Roldan E. R. S. 2006. Sperm competition enhances functional capacity of mammalian spermatozoa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15 113–15 11710.1073/pnas.0605795103 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0605795103) PubMed DOI PMC
Gasparini C., Simmons L. W., Beveridge M., Evans J. P. 2010. Sperm swimming velocity predicts competitive fertilization success in the green swordtail Xiphophorus helleri. PLoS ONE 5, e12146.10.1371/journal.pone.0012146 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012146) PubMed DOI PMC
Laskemoen T., Kleven O., Fossoy F., Robertson R. J., Rudolfsen G., Lifjeld J. T. 2010. Sperm quantity and quality effects on fertilization success in a highly promiscuous passerine, the tree swallow Tachycineta bicolor. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64, 1473–148310.1007/s00265-010-0962-8 (doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0962-8) DOI
Dean M. D., Nachman M. W. 2009. Faster fertilization rate in conspecific versus heterospecific matings in house mice. Evolution 63, 20–2810.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00499.x (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00499.x) PubMed DOI PMC
Firman R. C., Simmons L. W. 2008. The frequency of multiple paternity predicts variation in testes size among island populations of house mice. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 1524–153310.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01612.x (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01612.x) PubMed DOI
Piálek J., et al. 2008. Development of unique house mouse resources suitable for evolutionary studies of speciation. J. Hered. 99, 34–4410.1093/jhered/esm083 (doi:10.1093/jhered/esm083) PubMed DOI
Ďureje L., Macholán M., Baird S. J. E., Piálek J. In press. The mouse hybrid zone in Central Europe: from morphology to molecules. Folia Zool.
Barton N. H., Bengtsson B. O. 1986. The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations. Heredity 56, 357–37610.1038/hdy.1986.135 (doi:10.1038/hdy.1986.135) PubMed DOI
Piálek J., Barton N. H. 1997. The spread of an advantageous allele across a barrier: the effects of random drift and selection against heterozygotes. Genetics 145, 493–504 PubMed PMC
Baird S. J. E., Macholán M. 2012. What can the Mus musculus musculus/M. m. domesticus hybrid zone tell us about speciation? In Evolution of the house Mouse (eds Macholán M., Baird S. J. E., Munclinger P., Piálek J.), pp. 334–372 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Rosenfeld C. S., Grimm K. M., Livingston K. A., Brokman A. M., Lamberson W. E., Roberts R. M. 2003. Striking variation in the sex ratio of pups born to mice according to whether maternal diet is high in fat or carbohydrate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4628–463210.1073/pnas.0330808100 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0330808100) PubMed DOI PMC
Fisher R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Trivers R. L., Willard D. E. 1973. Natural selection of parental ability to vary sex ratio of offspring. Science 179, 90–79210.1126/science.179.4068.90 (doi:10.1126/science.179.4068.90) PubMed DOI
Janoušek V., et al. 2012. Genome-wide architecture of reproductive isolation in a naturally occurring hybrid zone between Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus. Mol. Ecol. 21, 3032–304710.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05583.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05583.x) PubMed DOI PMC
Sackton T. B., Montenegro H., Hartl D. L., Lemos B. 2011. Interspecific Y chromosome introgressions disrupt testis-specific gene expression and male reproductive phenotypes in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17 046–17 05110.1073/pnas.1114690108 (doi:10.1073/pnas.1114690108) PubMed DOI PMC
Ellis P. J. I., Bacon J., Affara N. A. 2011. Association of Sly with sex-linked gene amplification during mouse evolution: a side effect of genomic conflict in spermatids? Hum. Mol. Genet. 20, 3010–302110.1093/hmg/ddr204 (doi:10.1093/hmg/ddr204) PubMed DOI
Cocquet J., Ellis P. J. I., Yamauchi Y., Mahadevaiah S. K., Affara N. A., Ward M. A., Burgoyne P. S. 2009. The multicopy gene Sly represses the sex chromosomes in the male mouse germline after meiosis. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000244.10.1371/journal.pbio.1000244 (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000244) PubMed DOI PMC
Prdm9 Intersubspecific Interactions in Hybrid Male Sterility of House Mouse
Functional organization of the genome may shape the species boundary in the house mouse
Coevolution of Cryptosporidium tyzzeri and the house mouse (Mus musculus)