Novel predictors of left ventricular reverse remodeling in individuals with recent-onset dilated cardiomyopathy
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
23287372
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.072
PII: S0735-1097(12)05297-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Biomarkers MeSH
- Biopsy MeSH
- Diastole physiology MeSH
- Cardiomyopathy, Dilated blood pathology physiopathology surgery MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Echocardiography MeSH
- Edema pathology MeSH
- Endocardium pathology MeSH
- Contrast Media administration & dosage MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine MeSH
- Multivariate Analysis MeSH
- Myocardium pathology MeSH
- Myocarditis epidemiology MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Natriuretic Peptide, Brain blood MeSH
- Organometallic Compounds administration & dosage MeSH
- Ventricular Remodeling physiology MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Stroke Volume physiology MeSH
- Exercise Test MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Biomarkers MeSH
- gadobutrol MeSH Browser
- Contrast Media MeSH
- Natriuretic Peptide, Brain MeSH
- Organometallic Compounds MeSH
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), cardiac biomarkers, and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) results to predict left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) in individuals with recent-onset dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). BACKGROUND: LVRR is a marker of a favorable prognosis in individuals with recent-onset DCM. We used the aforementioned novel methods of prognostication to predict this event. METHODS: A total of 44 consecutive patients with recent-onset DCM underwent at baseline CMR, measurement of biomarkers and EMB together with conventional methods, including cardiopulmonary exercise testing and echocardiography. Measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the cardiological examination were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months. CMR was repeated at 12 months. LVRR was defined as an absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction from ≥10% to a final value of >35% accompanied by a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension ≥10% at 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: LVRR was observed in 20 individuals (45%) at 12 months. At baseline, a lower extent of late gadolinium enhancement (odds ratio [OR]: 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50 to 0.90]; p = 0.008) and a higher myocardial edema ratio (OR: 1.45 [95% CI: 1.04 to 2.02]; p = 0.027) measured by CMR were independent predictors of LVRR. At 3 months, the latest BNP plasma level (OR: 0.14 [95% CI: 0.02 to 0.94] per log BNP; p = 0.047) was the strongest predictor of LVRR. CONCLUSIONS: Both CMR and serial BNP testing provide a better prediction of LVRR in recent-onset DCM than EMB results, other biomarkers, and the conventional methods of follow-up.
References provided by Crossref.org
Left ventricular reverse remodelling and its predictors in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy