Gadolinium- and manganite-based contrast agents with fluorescent probes for both magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging of pancreatic islets: a comparative study
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- beta-Cyclodextrins chemistry MeSH
- Fluorescent Dyes chemistry MeSH
- Microscopy, Fluorescence MeSH
- Gadolinium chemistry MeSH
- Contrast Media chemistry MeSH
- Metal Nanoparticles chemistry MeSH
- Rats MeSH
- Cells, Cultured MeSH
- Islets of Langerhans cytology diagnostic imaging metabolism MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Rats, Inbred Lew MeSH
- Radiography MeSH
- Manganese Compounds chemistry MeSH
- Titanium chemistry MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Rats MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- beta-Cyclodextrins MeSH
- betadex MeSH Browser
- Fluorescent Dyes MeSH
- Gadolinium MeSH
- Contrast Media MeSH
- manganite MeSH Browser
- Manganese Compounds MeSH
- Titanium MeSH
- titanium dioxide MeSH Browser
Three magnetic resonance (MR)/fluorescence imaging probes were tested for visualization, cellular distribution, and survival of labeled pancreatic islets in vitro and following transplantation. As T(1) contrast agents (CAs), gadolinium(III) complexes linked to β-cyclodextrin (Gd-F-βCD) or bound to titanium dioxide (TiO2 @RhdGd) were tested. As a T(2) CA, perovskite manganite nanoparticles (LSMO@siF@si) were examined. Fluorescein or rhodamine was incorporated as a fluorescent marker in all probes. Islets labeled with gadolinium(III) CAs were visible as hyperintense spots on MR in vitro, but detection in vivo was inconclusive. Islets labeled with LSMO@siF@si CA were clearly visible as hypointense spots or areas on MR scans in vitro as well as in vivo. All CAs were detected inside the islet cells by fluorescence. Although the vitality and function of the labeled islets was not impaired by any of the tested CAs, results indicate that LSMO@siF@si CA is a superior marker for islet labeling, as it provides better contrast enhancement within a shorter scan time.
References provided by Crossref.org