Recolonization of bat roost by bat bugs (Cimex pipistrelli): could parasite load be a cause of bat roost switching?
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Chiroptera parasitology physiology MeSH
- Host-Parasite Interactions * MeSH
- Parasite Load * MeSH
- Sexual Behavior, Animal MeSH
- Bedbugs growth & development MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Roost ectoparasites are believed to have a negative impact on fitness of their hosts as birds or mammals. Previous studies were mostly focussed on the synchronization between reproduction cycles of ectoparasites and hosts living in infested roosts. However, to date, it has not been examined how fast ectoparasites colonize new, non-infested roosts and thus increasing the impact on the local populations of hosts. The parasite-host model was studied, including bat bugs Cimex pipistrelli and soprano pipistrelles Pipistrellus pygmaeus, where bat behaviour was observed which tended to reduce the parasite load in bat roosts. We investigated (1) whether bats change their roosting behaviour when we discontinued synchronization of their reproduction and the life cycle of the bat bugs and (2) how fast and which stages of bat bugs reoccupy cleaned roosts. In a 3-year field experiment, we removed all bat bugs from six bat boxes in each spring. Pipistrelles bred young in all non-infested boxes during these 3 years. In addition, 8 years of regular observations before this experiment indicate that bats avoided breeding in the same bat boxes at all. Bat bugs were found again in clean boxes in mid-May. However, their densities did not maximise before the beginning of June, before parturition. A re-appearance of bugs was observed after 21-56 days after the first bat visit. Adult bugs, mainly females, colonised cleaned boxes first though at the same time there were a lot of younger and smaller instars in non-manipulated roosts in the vicinity.
See more in PubMed
Oecologia. 2007 Dec;154(3):581-8 PubMed
Oecologia. 2001 Jan;126(1):1-9 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2010 Sep;107(4):827-33 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2008 Dec;104(1):163-8 PubMed
J Med Entomol. 2009 Sep;46(5):1015-20 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2012 Jul;111(1):457-69 PubMed
Anim Behav. 1998 Oct;56(4):909-917 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2007 May;100(6):1323-30 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 7;268(1480):2071-5 PubMed
Annu Rev Entomol. 2007;52:351-74 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2009 Oct;105(5):1345-9 PubMed
J Med Entomol. 2002 Jul;39(4):675-9 PubMed
