Impact of retransfusion of blood processed in cell-saver on coagulation versus cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective observational study using thromboelastography
Language English Country Czech Republic Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Observational Study
PubMed
23549515
DOI
10.5507/bp.2013.012
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Blood Coagulation physiology MeSH
- Cardiopulmonary Bypass * MeSH
- Blood Transfusion methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Retreatment MeSH
- Postoperative Hemorrhage blood diagnosis therapy MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Thrombelastography methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
AIMS: To compare an impact of retransfusion of blood processed in cell-saver (CS) with that of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on blood coagulation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Prospective observational study using thromboelastography (TEG). RESULTS: TEG samples from 170 patients were analyzed. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in 100 patients while 70 patients were operated off-pump. In 20 off-pump patients collected blood was processed by cell-saver and returned. In all patients clot formation after heparin neutralization by protamine was unimpaired. However, there was a significant increase in fibrinolysis defined by the TEG parameter Lysis time 30 min after the maximum amplitude of the clot was reached (Ly30) in groups with CPB or CS but this increase still did not exceed the threshold for clinical fibrinolysis (Ly30 > 7.5%). In the group without CPB there was no significant impact on coagulation. CONCLUSION: Surgery that avoids CPB and/or CS is the gentlest method for inducing blood coagulation.
References provided by Crossref.org