Soil nutritional status, not inoculum identity, primarily determines the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth of Knautia arvensis plants

. 2013 Oct ; 23 (7) : 561-72. [epub] 20130409

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid23568184

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis is among the factors contributing to plant survival in serpentine soils characterised by unfavourable physicochemical properties. However, AM fungi show a considerable functional diversity, which is further modified by host plant identity and edaphic conditions. To determine the variability among serpentine AM fungal isolates in their effects on plant growth and nutrition, a greenhouse experiment was conducted involving two serpentine and two non-serpentine populations of Knautia arvensis plants grown in their native substrates. The plants were inoculated with one of the four serpentine AM fungal isolates or with a complex AM fungal community native to the respective plant population. At harvest after 6-month cultivation, intraradical fungal development was assessed, AM fungal taxa established from native fungal communities were determined and plant growth and element uptake evaluated. AM symbiosis significantly improved the performance of all the K. arvensis populations. The extent of mycorrhizal growth promotion was mainly governed by nutritional status of the substrate, while the effect of AM fungal identity was negligible. Inoculation with the native AM fungal communities was not more efficient than inoculation with single AM fungal isolates in any plant population. Contrary to the growth effects, a certain variation among AM fungal isolates was revealed in terms of their effects on plant nutrient uptake, especially P, Mg and Ca, with none of the AM fungi being generally superior in this respect. Regardless of AM symbiosis, K. arvensis populations significantly differed in their relative nutrient accumulation ratios, clearly showing the plant's ability to adapt to nutrient deficiency/excess.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 2;107(5):2093-8 PubMed

Mycorrhiza. 2007 Dec;18(1):1-14 PubMed

Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9 PubMed

Ann Bot. 2009 Apr;103(6):963-74 PubMed

Microb Ecol. 2007 Oct;54(3):543-52 PubMed

New Phytol. 2009 Mar;181(4):950-959 PubMed

Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Oct;10(10):407-11 PubMed

New Phytol. 2010 Mar;185(4):1050-61 PubMed

Can J Microbiol. 2011 Jan;57(1):21-8 PubMed

New Phytol. 2008;177(3):779-789 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2011 Oct;14(10):1001-9 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2003 Sep;133(1):16-20 PubMed

Nature. 2001 Jul 5;412(6842):72-6 PubMed

Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62:227-50 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Feb;61(2):456-60 PubMed

New Phytol. 2010 Feb;185(3):631-47 PubMed

Science. 2007 Jun 22;316(5832):1746-8 PubMed

Mycorrhiza. 2003 Aug;13(4):185-90 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2012 May;21(10):2341-53 PubMed

New Phytol. 2009;183(1):212-223 PubMed

New Phytol. 2012 Mar;193(4):970-984 PubMed

Ecology. 2010 Oct;91(10):3037-46 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...