Bird song plays an important role in the establishment and maintenance of prezygotic reproductive barriers. When two closely related species come into secondary contact, song convergence caused by acquisition of heterospecific songs into the birds' repertoires is often observed. The proximate mechanisms responsible for such mixed singing, and its effect on the speciation process, are poorly understood. We used a combination of genetic and bioacoustic analyses to test whether mixed singing observed in the secondary contact zone of two passerine birds, the Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) and the Common Nightingale (L. megarhynchos), is caused by introgressive hybridization. We analysed song recordings of both species from allopatric and sympatric populations together with genotype data from one mitochondrial and seven nuclear loci. Semi-automated comparisons of our recordings with an extensive catalogue of Common Nightingale song types confirmed that most of the analysed sympatric Thrush Nightingale males were 'mixed singers' that use heterospecific song types in their repertoires. None of these 'mixed singers' possessed any alleles introgressed from the Common Nightingale, suggesting that they were not backcross hybrids. We also analysed songs of five individuals with intermediate phenotype, which were identified as F1 hybrids between the Thrush Nightingale female and the Common Nightingale male by genetic analysis. Songs of three of these hybrids corresponded to the paternal species (Common Nightingale) but the remaining two sung a mixed song. Our results suggest that although hybridization might increase the tendency for learning songs from both parental species, interspecific cultural transmission is the major proximate mechanism explaining the occurrence of mixed singers among the sympatric Thrush Nightingales. We also provide evidence that mixed singing does not substantially increase the rate of interspecific hybridization and discuss the possible adaptive value of this phenomenon in nightingales.

Department of Ecology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Verzijden MN, ten Cate C, Servedio MR, Kozak GM, Boughman JW, et al. (2012) The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 27: 511–519. PubMed

Grant PR, Grant BR (1997) Genetics and the origin of bird species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 7768–7775. PubMed PMC

Grant PR, Grant BR (1997) Hybridization, sexual imprinting and mate choice. Am Nat 149: 1–28.

Grant PR, Grant BR (1997) Mating patterns of Darwin's finch hybrids determined by song and morphology. Biol J Linn Soc 60: 317–343.

Slabbekoorn H, Ellers J, Smith TB (2002) Bird song, ecology and speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357: 493–503. PubMed PMC

Price T (2007) Speciation in Birds. Roberts & Company Publishers, Greenwood Village, Colorado. 470 p.

Grant PR (1972) Convergent and divergent character displacement. Biol J Linn Soc 4: 39–68.

Haavie J, Borge T, Bures S, Garamszegi LZ, Lampe HM, et al. (2004) Flycatcher song in allopatry and sympatry – convergence, divergence and reinforcement. J Evol Biol 17: 227–237. PubMed

Schluter D (2000) Ecological character displacement in adaptive radiation. Am Nat 156: S4–S16.

Kirschel ANG, Blumstein BT, Smith TB (2009) Character displacement of song and morphology in African tinkerbirds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 8256–8261. PubMed PMC

Thielcke G (1972) Waldbaumlaufer (Certhia familiaris) ahmen artfremdes Signal nach und reagieren darauf. J Ornithol 113: 287–296.

Helb HW, Dowsett-Lemaire F, Bergmann HH, Conrads K (1985) Mixed singing in European songbirds – a review. Z Tierpsychol 69: 27–41.

Alatalo RV, Eriksson D, Gustafsson L, Lundberg A (1990) Hybridization between pied and collared flycatchers – sexual selection and speciation theory. J Evol Biol 3: 375–389.

Badyaev AV, Leaf ES (1997) Habitat associations of song characteristics in Phylloscopus and Hippolais warblers. Auk 114: 40–46.

Slabbekoorn H, Ellers J, Smith TB (2002) Birdsong and sound transmission: the benefits of reverberations. Condor 104: 564–573.

Seddon N (2005) Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution 59: 200–215. PubMed

Derryberry EP (2009) Ecology shapes birdsong evolution: variation in morphology and habitat explains variation in white-crowned sparrow song. Am Nat 174: 24–33. PubMed

Grant PR, Grant BR (1992) Hybridization of bird species. Science 256: 193–197. PubMed

de KortSR, den Hartog PM, Cate C (2002) Diverge or merge? The effect of sympatric occurrence on the territorial vocalizations of the vinaceous dove Streptopelia vinacea and the ring-necked dove S. capicola . J Avian Biol 33: 150–158.

Secondi J, Bordas P, Hipsley CA, Bensch S (2011) Bilateral song convergence in a passerine hybrid zone: genetics contribute in one species only. Evol Biol 38: 441–452.

Lemaire F (1977) Mixed song, interspecific competition and hybridisation in the reed and marsh warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus and palustris). Behaviour 63: 215–240.

Grant PR, Grant BR (2008) Fission and fusion of Darwin’s finches populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 363: 2821–2829. PubMed PMC

Qvarnström A, Haavie J, Saether SA, Eriksson D, Pärt T (2006) Song similarity predicts hybridization in flycatchers. J Evol Biol 19: 1202–1209. PubMed

Marler P (1997) Three models of song learning: evidence from behavior. J Neurobiol 33: 501–516. PubMed

Nicolakakis N, Sol D, Lefebvre L (2003) Behavioural flexibility predicts species richness in birds, but not extinction risk. Anim Behav 65: 445–452.

Lachlan RF, Servedio MR (2004) Song learning accelerates allopatric speciation. Evolution 58: 2049–2063. PubMed

Parker KA, Anderson MJ, Jenkins PF, Brunton DH (2012) The effects of translocation-induced isolation and fragmentation on the cultural evolution of bird song. Ecol Lett 15: 778–785. PubMed

Grant BR, Grant PR (1993) Evolution of Darwin's Finches caused by a rare climatic event. Proc R Soc Lond B 251: 111–117.

Smith JW, Benkman CW (1993) A coevolutionary arms race causes ecological speciation in Crossbills. Am Nat 169: 455–465. PubMed

Dieckmann U, Doebeli M (1999) On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 354–357. PubMed

Grant BR, Grant PR (1996) High survival of Darwin’s finch hybrids: effects of beak morphology and diets. Ecology 77: 500–509.

Baker MC, Boylan JT (1999) Singing behavior, mating associations and reproductive success in a population of hybridizing Lazuli and Indigo Buntings. Condor 101: 493–504.

Secondi J, Bretagnolle V, Compagnon C, Faivre B (2003) Species-specific song convergence in a moving hybrid zone between two passerines. Biol J Linn Soc 80: 507–517.

Cody ML (1969) Convergent characteristics in sympatric species: a possible relation to interspecific competition and aggression. Condor 71: 222–239.

Patten MA, Rotenberry JT, Zuk M (2004) Habitat selection, acoustic adaptation, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 58: 2144–2155. PubMed

Podos J (1997) A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalization in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution 51: 537–551. PubMed

Hoese WJ, Podos J, Boetticher NC, Nowicki S (2000) Vocal tract function in bird song production: Experimental manipulation of beak movements. J Exp Biol 203: 1845–1855. PubMed

Podos J (2001) Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin’s finches. Nature 409: 185–188. PubMed

Grant PR, Grant BR (1996) Cultural inheritance of song and its role in the evolution of Darwin finches. Evolution 50: 2471–2487. PubMed

Grant PR, Grant BR (1998) Hybridization and speciation in Darwin's Finches: the role of sexual imprinting on a culturally transmitted trait. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SL, editors. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 404–422.

Storchová R, Reif J, Nachman MW (2010) Female heterogamety and speciation: Reduced introgression of the Z chromosome between two species of nightingales. Evolution 64: 456–471. PubMed PMC

Hagemeijer WJM, Blair MJ (1997) The EBCC Atlas of European breeding bird distribution and abundance. T and AD Poyser, London. 904 p.

Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European Passerines. Thetford: British Trust for Ornithology. 368 p.

Cramp S (ed.) (2000) The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Concise Edition and CD-ROM Set. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1832 p.

Sorjonen J (1986) Mixed singing and interspecific territoriality - consequences of secondary contact of two ecologically and morphologically similar nightingale species in Europe. Ornis Scand 17: 53–67.

Ranoszek E (2001) Occurrence and habitat preferences in breeding season of the Thrush Nightingale Luscinia luscinia and the Nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos in the Barycz river valley. Ptaki Slaska 13: 19–30. [in Polish with English summary].

Reifová R, Reif J, Antczak M, Nachman MW (2011) Ecological character displacement in the face of gene flow: Evidence from two species of nightingales. BMC Evol Biol 11: 138. PubMed PMC

Becker J (2007) About Nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos), Thrush Nightingales (Luscinia luscinia) and their hybrids – further results of an investigation via bird ringing in the Frankfurt (Oder) area. Vogelwarte 45: 15–26. [in German with English summary].

Kverek P, Storchová R, Reif J, Nachman MW (2008) Occurrence of a hybrid between the Common Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) and the Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) in the Czech Republic confirmed by genetic analysis. Sylvia 44: 17–26. [in Czech with English summary].

Reifová R, Kverek P, Reif J (2011) The first record of a hybrid female between the Common Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) and the Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) in nature. J Ornithol 152: 1063–1068.

Stadie C (1983) Erste Ergebnisse zur verwandtschaftlichen Beziehung zwischen Nachtigall (Luscinia megarhynchos) und Sprosser (Luscinia luscinia). Voliere 6: 87–91.

Hultsch H, Todt D (1981) Repertoire sharing and song-post distance in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos B.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8: 183–188.

Kipper S, Mundry R, Hultsch H, Todt D (2004) Long-term persistence of song performance rules in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): A longitudinal field study on repertoire size and composition. Behaviour 141: 371–390.

Griesmann B, Naguib M (2002) Song sharing in neighboring and non-neighboring Thrush Nightingales (Luscinia luscinia) and its implications for communication. Ethology 108: 377–387.

Lille R (1988) Species-specific song and mixed singing of nightingale and thrush nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos, L. luscinia). J Ornithol 129: 133–159. [in German with English summary].

Hultsch H (1993) Tracing the memory mechanisms in the song acquisition of nightingales. Neth J Zool 43: 155–171.

Hultsch H, Todt D (2008) Comparative aspects of song learning. In: Zeigler HP, Marler P, editors. Neuroscience of birdsong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 204–216.

Schmidt E (1973) Zur Ökologie des Sprossers (Luscinia luscinia L.) in der Theiss-auen bei Tiszatelek, nach seiner Ankunft im Frühling. Tiscia 8: 79–81.

Mundry R (2000) Structure and use of song in Luscinia mixed singers. PhD thesis, Free University Berlin [in German with English summary].

Roché JC (1995) Die Vogelstimmen Europas auf 4 CDs. Stuttgart: Franckh-Kosmos.

Specht R (2007) Avisoft-SASLab Pro ver. 4.5, 5. Sound analysis and synthesis software. Berlin: Avisoft Bioacoustics. Available at www.avisoft.com.

Kiefer S, Scharff C, Kipper S (2011) Does age matter in song bird vocal interactions? Results from interactive playback experiments. Front Zool 8: 29. PubMed PMC

Sprau P, Mundry R (2010) Song type sharing in common nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos) and its implications for cultural evolution. Anim Behav 80: 427–434.

Borge T, Webster MT, Andersson G, Sætre GP (2005) Contrasting patterns of polymorphism and divergence on the Z chromosome and autosomes in two Ficedula flycatcher species. Genetics 171: 1861–1873. PubMed PMC

Backström N, Brandström M, Gustafsson L, Qvarnström A, Cheng H, et al. (2006) Genetic mapping in a natural population of collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis): Conserved synteny but gene order rearrangements on the avian Z chromosome. Genetics 174: 377–386. PubMed PMC

Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160: 1217–1229. PubMed PMC

Pigozzi MI (2008) Relationship between physical and genetic distances along the zebra finch Z chromosome. Chromosome Res 16: 839–849. PubMed

R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.R-project.org.

Huber SK, Podos J (2006) Beak morphology and song features covary in a population of Darwin's finches (Geospiza fortis). Biol J Linn Soc 88: 489–498.

Sorjonen J (1986) Song structure and singing strategies in the genus Luscinia in different habitats and geographical areas. Behaviour 98: 274–285.

Veen T, Borge T, Griffith SC, Saetre GP, Bures S, et al. (2001) Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature 411: 45–50. PubMed

Grether GF, Losin N, Anderson CN, Okamoto K (2009) The role of interspecific interference competition in character displacement and the evolution of competitor recognition. Biol Rev 84: 617–635. PubMed

Robinson SK, Terborgh J (1995) Interspecific aggression and habitat selection by Amazonian birds. J Anim Ecol 64: 1–11.

ten Cate C, Vos RD (1999) Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: A reassessment. Adv Study Behav 28: 1–31.

Collins SA, Luddem ST (2002) Degree of male ornamentation affects female preference for conspecific versus heterospecific males. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269: 111–117. PubMed PMC

Rowell JT, Servedio MR (2012) Vocal communications and the maintenance of population specific songs in a contact zone. PLOS ONE 7: e35257. PubMed PMC

Vadas RL (1990) Competitive exclusion, character convergence, or optimal foraging: which should we expect? Oikos 58: 123–127.

Laiolo P (2012) Interspecific interactions drive cultural co-evolution and acoustic convergence in syntopic species. J Anim Ecol 81: 594–604. PubMed

Garamszegi LZ, Eens M, Pavlova DZ, Aviles JM, Møller AP (2007) A comparative study of the function of heterospecific vocal mimicry in European passerines. Behav Ecol 18: 1001–1009.

Leary CJ (2001) Evidence of convergent character displacement in release vocalizations of Bufo fowleri and Bufo terrestris (Anura; Bufonidae). Anim Behav 61: 431–438.

Tyack PL (2008) Convergence of calls as animals form social bonds, active compensation for noisy communication channels, and the evolution of vocal learning in mammals. J Comp Psychol 122: 319–31. PubMed

Postcopulatory sexual selection reduces Z-linked genetic variation and might contribute to the large Z effect in passerine birds

Genomic islands of differentiation in two songbird species reveal candidate genes for hybrid female sterility