Comparison of properties of tablets and energy profile of compaction of two spray-dried lactoses
Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko Médium print
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
23610968
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- aerosoly MeSH
- celulosa chemie MeSH
- farmaceutická chemie MeSH
- farmaceutická technologie metody MeSH
- kinetika MeSH
- kyseliny stearové chemie MeSH
- laktosa chemie MeSH
- lubrikanty chemie MeSH
- pevnost v tahu MeSH
- pevnost v tlaku MeSH
- pomocné látky chemie MeSH
- rozpustnost MeSH
- tablety MeSH
- vysoušení MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- aerosoly MeSH
- celulosa MeSH
- kyseliny stearové MeSH
- laktosa MeSH
- lubrikanty MeSH
- microcrystalline cellulose MeSH Prohlížeč
- pomocné látky MeSH
- stearic acid MeSH Prohlížeč
- tablety MeSH
The paper compared two spray-dried lactoses Flowlac 100 and SuperTab 14SD from the standpoint of tensile strength and disintegration time of tablets, the effect of an addition of the lubricant magnesium stearate and silicified microcrystalline cellulose on these properties, and also from the standpoint of the energy profile of compression. The comparison of the values was performed at the compression force of 15 kN. The strength of tablets was higher in the case of SuperTab 14SD, an increase in the concentration of magnesium stearate did not decrease tablet strength. Prosolv SMCC 90 increased the strength of tablets and made it equal for both lactoses, but it also increased the sensitivity to the added lubricant. The disintegration time of tablets was shorter in the case of SuperTab 14SD, an increased concentration of magnesium stearate prolonged it, and an addition of Prosolv SMCC 90 shortened it and made it equal for both lactoses. From the energy standpoint, the maximal energy was higher in the case of SuperTab 14SD, an addition of Prosolv SMCC 90 increased it and again made it equal for both lactoses. The differences in the values of the maximal energy were primarily due to the values of the energy for friction and the energy accumulated by the tablet after compression, and there was no marked difference in the values of the energy of decompression. SuperTab 14SD showed a higher plasticity than Flowlac 100.