The primary purpose of this study was to explore the link between rail and road traffic noise and overall life satisfaction. While the negative relationship between residential satisfaction and traffic noise is relatively well-established, much less is known about the effect of traffic noise on overall life satisfaction. Based on results of previous studies, we propose a model that links objective noise levels, noise sensitivity, noise annoyance, residential satisfaction and life satisfaction. Since it is not clear whether a bottom-up or top-down relationship between residential satisfaction and life satisfaction holds, we specify models that incorporate both of these theoretical propositions. Empirical models are tested using structural equation modeling and data from a survey among residents of areas with high levels of road traffic noise (n1 = 354) and rail traffic noise (n2 = 228). We find that traffic noise has a negative effect on residential satisfaction, but no significant direct or indirect effects on overall life satisfaction. Noise annoyance due to road and rail traffic noise has strong negative effect on residential satisfaction rather than on overall life satisfaction. These results are very similar for the road and railway traffic contexts and regardless of whether the model assumes the top-down or bottom-up direction of the causation between life satisfaction and residential satisfaction.

Charles University Environment Center José Martího 2 160 00 Praha 6 Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise—Quantification of Healthy Life Years Lost in Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe; Copenhagen, Denmark: 2011.

Position Paper on Dose-Effect Relationships for Night Time Noise. European Commission Working Group on Health and Socio-Economic Aspects; Brussels, Belgium: 2004.

Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation of the Environmental Noise Directive in accordance with Article 11 of Directive 2002/49/EC. European Commission; Brussels, Belgium: 2011.

Den Boer L.C., Schroten A. Traffic Noise Reduction in Europe—Health Effects, Social Costs and Technical and Policy Options to Reduce Road and Rail Traffic Noise. CE Delft; Delft, The Netherlands: 2007.

Miedema H.M., Oudshoorn C.G. Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001;109:409–416. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109409. PubMed DOI PMC

Lim C., Kim J., Hong J., Lee S. The relationship between railway noise and community annoyance in Korea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006;120:2037–2042. doi: 10.1121/1.2266539. PubMed DOI

Morihara T., Sato T., Yano T. Comparison of dose-response relationships between railway and road traffic noises: The moderating effect of distance. J. Sound Vib. 2004;277:559–565. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.03.017. DOI

Lindvall T., Radford E.P. Measurement of annoyance due to exposure to environmental factors. Environ. Res. 1973;6:1–36. PubMed

Miedema H.M.E. Annoyance caused by environmental noise: Elements for evidence-based noise policies. J. Soc. Issues. 2007;63:41–57.

Fyhri A., Klaboe R. Road traffic noise, sensitivity, annoyance and self-reported health—A structural equation model exercise. Environ. Int. 2009;35:91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.08.006. PubMed DOI

Schultz T.J. Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1978;64:377–405. doi: 10.1121/1.382013. PubMed DOI

Pedersen T. The “Genlyd” Noise Annoyance Model: Dose-Response Relationships Modelled by Logistic Functions. DELTA Acoustics & Electronics; Hørsholm, Denmark: 2007.

Jakovljevic B., Paunovic K., Belojevic G. Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an urban population. Environ. Int. 2009;35:552–556. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.10.001. PubMed DOI

Fyhri A., Klæboe R. Road traffic noise, sensitivity, annoyance and self-reported health—A structural equation model exercise. Environ. Int. 2009;35:91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.08.006. PubMed DOI

Guski R. Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. Noise Health. 1999;1:45–56. PubMed

Job R.S.F. Noise sensitivity as a factor influencing human reaction to noise. Noise Health. 1999;1:57–68. PubMed

Miedema H., Vos H. Noise sensitivity and reactions to noise and other environmental conditions. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 2003;113:1492–1504. doi: 10.1121/1.1547437. PubMed DOI

Paunović K., Jakovljević B., Belojević G. Predictors of noise annoyance in noisy and quiet urban streets. Sci. Total Environ. 2009;407:3707–3711. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.033. PubMed DOI

Weinstein N.D. Individual differences in reactions to noise: A longitudinal study in a college dormitory. J. Appl. Psychol. 1978;63:458–466. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.458. PubMed DOI

Zimmer K., Ellermeier W. Psychometric Properties of Four Measures of Noise Sensitivity: A Comparison. J. Environ. Psychol. 1999;19:295–302. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0133. DOI

Schreckenberg D., Meis M., Kahl C., Peschel C., Eikmann T. Aircraft noise and quality of life around Frankfurt Airport. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2010;7:3382–3405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7093382. PubMed DOI PMC

Frey B.S., Stutzer A. What can economists learn from happiness research? J. Econ. Lit. 2002;40:402–435. doi: 10.1257/002205102320161320. DOI

Tella R.D., MacCulloch R.J., Oswald A.J. The macroeconomics of happiness. Rev. Econ. Statist. 2003;85:809–827. doi: 10.1162/003465303772815745. DOI

Andrews F.M., Withey S.B. Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans’ Perceptions of Life Quality. Plenum Press; New York, NY, USA: 1976.

Kahneman D., Sugden R. Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environ. Resource Econ. 2005;32:161–181. doi: 10.1007/s10640-005-6032-4. DOI

van Praag B.M.S., Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach. Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA: 2008.

Clark A.E., Oswald A.J. Unhappiness and unemployment. Econ. J. 1994;104:648–659. doi: 10.2307/2234639. DOI

Easterlin R.A. Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Econ. J. 2001;111:465–484.

Tella R.D., MacCulloch R.J., Oswald A.J. Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. Amer. Econ. Rev. 2001;91:335–341. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.1.335. DOI

Rehdanz K., Maddison D. Local environmental quality and life-satisfaction in Germany. Ecol. Econ. 2008;64:787–797. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.016. DOI

Rehdanz K., Maddison D. Climate and happiness. Ecol. Econ. 2005;52:111–125.

Brereton F., Clinch J.P., Ferreira S. Happiness, geography and the environment. Ecol. Econ. 2008;65:386–396. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.008. DOI

Frijters P., Praag B.M.S.V. The effects of climate on welfare and well-Being in Russia. Climatic Change. 1998;39:61–81. doi: 10.1023/A:1005347721963. DOI

Welsch H. Preferences over prosperity and pollution: Environmental valuation based on happiness surveys. Kyklos. 2002;55:473–494.

Welsch H. Environment and happiness: Valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data. Ecol. Econ. 2006;58:801–813. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.006. DOI

Welsch H. Environmental welfare analysis: A life satisfaction approach. Ecol. Econ. 2007;62:544–551. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.017. DOI

Ferreira S., Moro M., Clinch J.P. Valuing the Environment Using the Life-Satisfaction Approach. University College Dublin; Dublin, Ireland: 2006. (Planning and Environmental Policy Research Series, PEP/06/05).

MacKerron G., Mourato S. Life satisfaction and air quality in London. Ecol. Econ. 2009;68:1441–1453. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.004. DOI

Easterlin R.A., Angelescu L., Zweig J.S. The impact of modern economic growth on urban–Rural differences in subjective well-being. World Develop. 2011;39:2187–2198. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.015. DOI

Lercher P., Kofler W.W. Behavioral and health responses associated with road traffic noise exposure along alpine through-traffic routes. Sci. Total Environ. 1996:85–89. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(96)05194-7. PubMed DOI

van Praag B.M.S., Baarsma B.E. Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: The case of airport noise. Econ. J. 2005;115:224–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00967.x. DOI

Botteldooren D., Dekoninck L., Gillis D. The influence of traffic noise on appreciation of the living quality of a neighborhood. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2011;8:777–798. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8030777. PubMed DOI PMC

Kroesen M., Molin E.J.E., Miedema H.M.E., Vos H., Janssen S.A., van Wee B. Estimation of the effects of aircraft noise on residential satisfaction. Transp. Res. Pt. D Transp. Environ. 2010;15:144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2009.12.005. DOI

Shepherd D., Welch D., Dirks K.N., Mathews R. Exploring the relationship between noise sensitivity, annoyance and health-related quality of life in a sample of adults exposed to environmental noise. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2010;7:3579–3594. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7103580. PubMed DOI PMC

Dratva J., Zemp E., Felber Dietrich D., Bridevaux P.-O., Rochat T., Schindler C., Gerbase M.W. Impact of road traffic noise annoyance on health-related quality of life: Results from a population-based study. Qual. Life Res. 2010;19:37–46. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9571-2. PubMed DOI

Rogerson R.J. Environmental and health-related quality of life: Conceptual and methodological similarities. Soc. Sci. Med. 1995;41:1373–1382. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00122-N. PubMed DOI

Diener E., Suh E.M., Lucas R.E., Smith H.L. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychol. Bull. 1999;125:276–302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276. DOI

Heady B., Veenhoven R., Wearing A. Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Soc. Indic. Res. 1991;24:81–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00292652. DOI

Scherpenzeel A., Saris W. Causal direction in a model of life satisfaction: The top-down/bottom-up controversy. Soc. Indic. Res. 1996;38:161–180. doi: 10.1007/BF00300457. DOI

Amérigo M., Aragonés J.I. A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. J. Environ. Psychol. 1997;17:47–57. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1996.0038. DOI

Sirgy M.J., Cornwell T. How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Soc. Indic. Res. 2002;59:79–114. doi: 10.1023/A:1016021108513. DOI

Bluhm G., Nordling E., Berglind N. Road traffic noise and annoyance—An increasing environmental health problem. Noise Health. 2004;6:43–49. PubMed

Cantril H. The Pattern of Human Concerns. Rutgers University Press; New Brunswick, NJ, USA: 1966.

Carroll N., Frijters P., Shields M.A. Quantifying the costs of drought: New evidence from life satisfaction data. J. Popul. Econ. 2009;22:445–461. doi: 10.1007/s00148-007-0174-3. DOI

Luechinger S. Valuing air quality using the life satisfaction approach. Econ. J. 2009;119:482–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02241.x. DOI

Ferrer-i-Carbonell A., Frijters P. How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ. J. 2004;114:641–659. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00235.x. DOI

Kish L. Survey Sampling. Wiley-Interscience; New York, NY, USA: 1995.

Bollen K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. 1st. Wiley & Sons; New York, NY, USA: 1989.

Muthén B. Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical data. J. Econometrics. 1983;22:43–65. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(83)90093-3. DOI

Muthén B., du Toit S.H.C., Spisic D. Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. 1997. Unpublished paper.

Muthén L.K., Muthén B.O. Mplus User’s Guide. 6th. Muthén & Muthén; Los Angeles, CA, USA: 2010.

Hoe S.L. Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. JAQM. 2008;3:76–83.

MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., Sugawara H.M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol. Methods. 1996;1:130–149. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130. DOI

Kline R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd. The Guilford Press; London, UK: 2004.

Paternoster R., Brame R., Mazerolle P., Piquero A. Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology. 1998;36:859–866. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x. DOI

Pospěch P., Delín M., Spěšná D. Quality of life in Czech rural areas. Agric. Econ.-Czech. 2009;55:284–295.

Baum S., Arthurson K., Rickson K. Happy people in mixed-up places: The association between the degree and type of local socioeconomic mix and expressions of neighbourhood satisfaction. Urban Stud. 2010;47:467–485. doi: 10.1177/0042098009351941. DOI

Rubin D. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non-randomized studies. J. Educ. Psychol. 1974;66:688–701. doi: 10.1037/h0037350. DOI