Tokenism is a situation in which a member of a distinctive category is treated differently from other people. This article is about the situation in which Tokens (people perceived as distinctive) are considered experts on something for having the properties of a token (the thing which makes them distinctive). Tokens who differ by appearance or by being born into another culture might be considered experts on cultures grouped into the same racial/cultural category. Tokens who differ by being skilled in number-related mathematics might be considered experts on the mathematization of phenomena. Tokens might say that some result is valid for all people in some racial/cultural category without sufficient evidence, or use number-related mathematics as a mathematization of psychological phenomena without trying to find more abstract mathematizations. This harms psychological research. A possible future genesis of cultural and number tokenisms is discussed, and some suggestions to improve the discourse offered. The effect of tokenism might be diminished if psychologists focus on more proper thinking about psychological phenomena.

College of Social Sciences National Chengchi University Taipei Taiwan Zahradníkova 26 Brno 60200 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Am Psychol. 2001 Nov;56(11):1019-30 PubMed

Am Psychol. 2008 Jan;63(1):32-50 PubMed

Cult Divers Ment Health. 1998;4(3):185-202 PubMed

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;5(6):708-13 PubMed

Am Psychol. 2008 Oct;63(7):602-14 PubMed

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2010 Sep;44(3):245-51 PubMed

Soc Stud Sci. 1999 Aug;29(4):629-37 PubMed

Am Psychol. 2010 Jan;65(1):1-12 PubMed

Psychology is not primarily Empirical Science: A Comparison of Cultures in the Lexical Hypothesis Tradition as a Failure of Introspection