On InChI and evaluating the quality of cross-reference links
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
24742140
PubMed Central
PMC4005828
DOI
10.1186/1758-2946-6-15
PII: 1758-2946-6-15
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: There are many databases of small molecules focused on different aspects of research and its applications. Some tasks may require integration of information from various databases. However, determining which entries from different databases represent the same compound is not straightforward. Integration can be based, for example, on automatically generated cross-reference links between entries. Another approach is to use the manually curated links stored directly in databases. This study employs well-established InChI identifiers to measure the consistency and completeness of the manually curated links by comparing them with the automatically generated ones. RESULTS: We used two different tools to generate InChI identifiers and observed some ambiguities in their outputs. In part, these ambiguities were caused by indistinctness in interpretation of the structural data used. InChI identifiers were used successfully to find duplicate entries in databases. We found that the InChI inconsistencies in the manually curated links are very high (28.85% in the worst case). Even using a weaker definition of consistency, the measured values were very high in general. The completeness of the manually curated links was also very poor (only 93.8% in the best case) compared with that of the automatically generated links. CONCLUSIONS: We observed several problems with the InChI tools and the files used as their inputs. There are large gaps in the consistency and completeness of manually curated links if they are measured using InChI identifiers. However, inconsistency can be caused both by errors in manually curated links and the inherent limitations of the InChI method.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Williams AJ. Public chemical compound databases. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2008;11:393–404. PubMed
Martin E, Monge A, Duret J-A, Gualandi F, Peitsch MC, Pospisil P. Building an R&D chemical registration system. J Cheminform. 2012;4:11. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-4-11. PubMed DOI PMC
Gobbi A, Lee M-L. Handling of tautomerism and stereochemistry in compound registration. J Chem Inf Model. 2011;52:285–292. PubMed
Sitzmann M, Ihlenfeldt W-D, Nicklaus MC. Tautomerism in large databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2010;24:521–551. doi: 10.1007/s10822-010-9346-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Chen J, Swamidass SJ, Dou Y, Bruand J, Baldi P. ChemDB: a public database of small molecules and related chemoinformatics resources. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:4133–4139. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti683. PubMed DOI
Chambers J, Davies M, Gaulton A, Hersey A, Velankar S, Petryszak R, Hastings J, Bellis L, McGlinchey S, Overington JP. UniChem: a unified chemical structure cross-referencing and identifier tracking system. J Cheminform. 2013;5:3. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-5-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Weininger D, Weininger A, Weininger JL. SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1989;29:97–101. doi: 10.1021/ci00062a008. DOI
SMILES - A Simplified Chemical Language. http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smiles.html.
Williams AJ. The Messy World of Even Curated Chemistry on the Internet. http://www.chemconnector.com/2010/08/15/the-messy-world-of-even-curated-chemistry-on-the-internet/
Ott M, Vriend G. Correcting ligands, metabolites, and pathways. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:517. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-517. PubMed DOI PMC
Akhondi S a, Kors J a, Muresan S. Consistency of systematic chemical identifiers within and between small-molecule databases. J Cheminform. 2012;4:35. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-4-35. PubMed DOI PMC
Bachrach SM. InChI: a user’s perspective. J Cheminform. 2012;4:34. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-4-34. PubMed DOI PMC
IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology - the Gold Book. http://goldbook.iupac.org/
Dalby A, Nourse J, Hounshell D, Gushurst A, Grier D, Leland B, Laufer J. Description of several chemical structure file formats used by computer programs developed at molecular design limited. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1992;32:244–255. doi: 10.1021/ci00007a012. DOI
Accelrys. CTfile Formats. 2011. http://accelrys.com/products/informatics/cheminformatics/ctfile-formats/no-fee.php.
Stein SE, Heller SR, Tchekhovskoi DV, Pletnev IV. IUPAC International Chemical Identifier (InChI); InChI version 1, software version 1.04 (2011); Technical Manual. 2011. http://www.inchi-trust.org/fileadmin/user_upload/software/inchi-v1.04/InChI_TechMan.pdf.
The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier (InChI) http://www.iupac.org/home/publications/e-resources/inchi.html. PubMed
ChemAxon JChem. http://www.chemaxon.com/products/jchem-base/
De Matos P, Alcántara R, Dekker A, Ennis M, Hastings J, Haug K, Spiteri I, Turner S, Steinbeck C. Chemical entities of biological interest: an update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D249–D254. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp886. PubMed DOI PMC
Knox C, Law V, Jewison T, Liu P, Ly S, Frolkis A, Pon A, Banco K, Mak C, Neveu V, Djoumbou Y, Eisner R, Guo AC, Wishart DS. DrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for “omics” research on drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D1035–D1041. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1126. PubMed DOI PMC
Dimitropoulos D, Ionides J, Henrick K. Using MSDchem to search the PDB ligand dictionary. Curr Protoc Bioinforma. 2006;Chapter 14:Unit14.3. PubMed
Wishart DS, Jewison T, Guo AC, Wilson M, Knox C, Liu Y, Djoumbou Y, Mandal R, Aziat F, Dong E, Bouatra S, Sinelnikov I, Arndt D, Xia J, Liu P, Yallou F, Bjorndahl T, Perez-Pineiro R, Eisner R, Allen F, Neveu V, Greiner R, Scalbert A. HMDB 3.0–the human metabolome database in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D801–D807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1065. PubMed DOI PMC
Huang R, Southall N, Wang Y, Yasgar A, Shinn P, Jadhav A, Nguyen D-T, Austin CP. The NCGC pharmaceutical collection: a comprehensive resource of clinically approved drugs enabling repurposing and chemical genomics. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:80ps16. PubMed PMC
Bourne PE, Berman HM, McMahon B, Watenpaugh KD, Westbrook JD, Fitzgerald PM. Macromolecular crystallographic information file. Methods Enzymol. 1997;277:571–590. PubMed
RDF Primer. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/
Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/
Beckett D. RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/
Murray C. Oracle® Database Semantic Technologies Developer’s Guide 11g Release 2 (11.2) 2012. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/appdev.112/e25609.pdf.
Kiss R. Five most common issues with molecular database registration systems. Part 2: Isomer detection. http://blog.mcule.com/2011/07/five-most-common-issues-with-molecular_26.html.