Binding-competent states for L-arginine in E. coli arginine repressor apoprotein
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
- MeSH
- apoproteiny chemie metabolismus MeSH
- arginin chemie metabolismus MeSH
- konformace proteinů MeSH
- ligandy MeSH
- proteiny z Escherichia coli chemie metabolismus MeSH
- represorové proteiny chemie metabolismus MeSH
- simulace molekulární dynamiky MeSH
- simulace molekulového dockingu MeSH
- vazba proteinů MeSH
- vazebná místa MeSH
- vodíková vazba MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
- Názvy látek
- apoproteiny MeSH
- arginin MeSH
- ArgR protein, E coli MeSH Prohlížeč
- ligandy MeSH
- proteiny z Escherichia coli MeSH
- represorové proteiny MeSH
Arginine repressor of E. coli is a multifunctional hexameric protein that provides feedback regulation of arginine metabolism upon activation by the negatively cooperative binding of L-arginine. Interpretation of this complex system requires an understanding of the protein's conformational landscape. The ~50 kDa hexameric C-terminal domain was studied by 100 ns molecular dynamics simulations in the presence and absence of the six L-arg ligands that bind at the trimer-trimer interface. A rotational shift between trimers followed by rotational oscillation occurs in the production phase of the simulations only when L-arg is absent. Analysis of the system reveals that the degree of rotation is correlated with the number of hydrogen bonds across the trimer interface. The trajectory presents frames with one or more apparently open binding sites into which one L-arg could be docked successfully in three different instances, indicating that a binding-competent state of the system is occasionally sampled. Simulations of the resulting singly-liganded systems reveal for the first time that the binding of one L-arg results in a holoprotein-like conformational distribution.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1701-18 PubMed
Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 1;29(7):845-54 PubMed
Proteins. 2002 May 15;47(3):393-402 PubMed
Mol Microbiol. 1997 Jul;25(2):385-98 PubMed
Proteins. 2006 Nov 15;65(3):712-25 PubMed
Proteins. 2006 Aug 15;64(3):559-74 PubMed
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jun 03;6(6):e1000801 PubMed
Mol Microbiol. 1992 Jan;6(2):267-75 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 2003 Sep 19;332(3):537-53 PubMed
J Mol Graph. 1996 Feb;14(1):33-8, 27-8 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 2005 Feb 11;346(1):43-56 PubMed
Mol Microbiol. 1994 Aug;13(4):599-608 PubMed
Microbiol Rev. 1994 Dec;58(4):631-40 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 1996 Feb 23;256(2):377-91 PubMed
Nat Struct Biol. 1999 May;6(5):427-32 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 2001 Oct 5;312(5):949-62 PubMed
Mol Microbiol. 1994 Aug;13(4):609-18 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 1995 Nov 24;254(2):150-62 PubMed
Nat Struct Biol. 1997 Oct;4(10):819-26 PubMed
Molecular dynamics comparison of E. coli WrbA apoprotein and holoprotein