Predator interference and stability of predator-prey dynamics
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Models, Biological * MeSH
- Ecosystem MeSH
- Mathematical Concepts MeSH
- Population Dynamics MeSH
- Food Chain * MeSH
- Computational Biology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Predator interference, that is, a decline in the per predator consumption rate as predator density increases, is generally thought to promote predator-prey stability. Indeed, this has been demonstrated in many theoretical studies on predator-prey dynamics. In virtually all of these studies, the stabilization role is demonstrated as a weakening of the paradox of enrichment. With predator interference, stable limit cycles that appear as a result of environmental enrichment occur for higher values of the environmental carrying capacity of prey, and even a complete absence of the limit cycles can happen. Here we study predator-prey dynamics using the Rosenzweig-MacArthur-like model in which the Holling type II functional response has been replaced by a predator-dependent family which generalizes many of the commonly used descriptions of predator interference. By means of a bifurcation analysis we show that sufficiently strong predator interference may bring about another stabilizing mechanism. In particular, hysteresis combined with (dis)appearance of stable limit cycles imply abrupt increases in both the prey and predator densities and enhanced persistence and resilience of the predator-prey system. We encourage refitting the previously collected data on predator consumption rates as well as for conducting further predation experiments to see what functional response from the explored family is the most appropriate.
See more in PubMed
Nature. 2007 Oct 25;449(7165):1041-3 PubMed
Bull Math Biol. 2010 Jan;72(1):94-121 PubMed
Biol Lett. 2006 Dec 22;2(4):491-3 PubMed
Math Biosci Eng. 2008 Jul;5(3):567-83 PubMed
Math Biosci. 1999 Jan 1;155(1):61-75 PubMed
Theor Popul Biol. 2007 Aug;72(1):136-47 PubMed
Theor Popul Biol. 2004 May;65(3):299-315 PubMed
J Theor Biol. 2004 Apr 7;227(3):349-58 PubMed
J Theor Biol. 2010 Jun 7;264(3):787-98 PubMed
J Theor Biol. 2004 Mar 21;227(2):167-74 PubMed
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 16;3(7):e2687 PubMed
Science. 1971 Jan 29;171(3969):385-7 PubMed
Am Nat. 2009 Jan;173(1):72-88 PubMed
Nature. 2001 Oct 11;413(6856):591-6 PubMed
Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Aug;56(1):65-75 PubMed
