Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy

. 2014 Sep ; 9 (3) : 371-9. [epub] 20140526

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid25337160

INTRODUCTION: One way how to reduce morbidity and improve cosmesic of kidney surgery is single site laparoscopy. Relatively well described concept but without defined position in clincal practise. AIM: To report of institutional experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) nephrectomy (NE) and compare (matched case-control study) it with that of standard laparoscopic NE (LNE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the period 8/2011 to 10/2013, we performed 183 mini-invasive NE (132 tumours, 51 benign aetiology); 45 of them (24.6%) were LESS, the rest LNE. The main but not absolute indications for LESS were: non-obese men, and less advanced tumours. In 13 patients undergoing LESS-NEs (28.9%) there was a transumbilical approach. For the rest, a pararectal incision was performed and an accessory port was added in 31.1% (14) - 2/22 (9.1%) left sided, 12/23 (52.2%) right sided. Twenty-four LESS-NE were performed by a more experienced surgeon (mean operation time (MOT) 73.1 min), 21 LESS-NE by 4 other surgeons (MOT 132.8 min). These 24 were compared with 43 LNE done by the same surgeon before the period of LESS (1/2007-8/2011) and with similar characteristics of cases (body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m(2), less advanced tumour). RESULTS: We found no statistically significant differences in any of the parameters studied. The MOT 73.1 min vs. 75.0 min (p = 0.78), BMI 27.4 kg/m(2) vs. 29.2 kg/m(2) (p = 0.08), blood loss 54.7 vs. 39.2 (p = 0.47). Complications (4.2% vs. 11.6%) were only of internal character in origin. No conversion in either group. In LESS-NE, staplers were used more frequently (more expensive than clips) for division of renal hilar vessels (70.8% vs. 51.2%). The mean price of LESS-NE was €367 higher. CONCLUSIONS: The LESS NE performed by an experienced surgeon is a safe and efficient method for the surgical treatment of both malignant and benign renal conditions in patients with BMI < 30 kg/m(2) and with low-stage tumours. The LESS NE is more expensive compared to LNE.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. European Association of Urology Guideline Group EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol. 2010;58:398–406. PubMed

Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Ragavan N, et al. Clinical outcomes of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy. World J Urol. 2012;30:589–96. PubMed

Antonelli JA, Bagrodia A, Odom C, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a 5-year, single-surgeon experience. Eur Urol. 2013;64:412–8. PubMed

Gargollo PC. Hidden incision endoscopic surgery: description of technique, parental satisfaction and applications. J Urol. 2011;185:1425–31. PubMed

Eret V, Schmidt M, Stránský P, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in urology – a new frontier in minimally invasive surgery? Čes Urol. 2012;16:146–56.

Box G, Averch T, Cadeddu J, et al. Urologic NOTES Working Group Nomenclature of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures in urology. J Endourol. 2008;22:2575–81. PubMed

Georgiou AN, Rassweiler J, Herrmann TR, et al. Evolution and simplified terminology of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), and mini-laparoscopy (ML) World J Urol. 2012;30:573–80. PubMed

Bryks-Laszkowska A, Gołębiewski A, Czauderna P. Laparoscopic single port surgery nephrectomy in a child – initial experience. Videosurgery Miniinv. 2012;7:304–6. PubMed PMC

Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol. 2011;59:26–45. PubMed

Kurpiewski W, Pesta W, Kowalczyk M, et al. The outcomes of SILS cholecystectomy in comparison with classic four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Videosurgery Miniinv. 2012;7:286–93. PubMed PMC

Beiša V, Kildušis E, Strupas K. Single access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: initial experience. Videosurgery Miniinv. 2012;7:45–9. PubMed PMC

Pędziwiatr M, Matłok M, Major P, et al. Laparoscopic surgery of the spleen through single umbilical incision. Videosurgery Miniinv. 2013;8:8–12. PubMed PMC

Mir SA, Best SL, Donnally CJ, 3rd, et al. Minimally invasive nephrectomy: the influence of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery on patient selection, outcomes, and morbidity. Urology. 2011;77:631–4. PubMed

Springer C, Inferrera A, Kawan F, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell cancer in patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery: preliminary results of a single-centre retrospective study. World J Urol. 2013;31:213–8. PubMed

Rosoff JS, Fine RG, Velez MC, Del Pizzo JJ. Laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy for large renal masses. J Endourol. 2013;27:34–39. PubMed

Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Hellawell G, et al. Technique of laparoscopic-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2009;56:644–50. PubMed

Hora M, Ferda J, Kreuzberg B, et al. The use of two-phase CT-angiography in the surgical treatment of renal tumours. Čes Urol. 2005;9:14–9.

Hora M, Stránský P, Trávníček I, et al. Three-tesla MRI biphasic angiography: a method for preoperative assessment of the vascular supply in renal tumours-a surgical perspective. World J Urol. 2013;31:1171–6. PubMed

Major P, Matłok M, Pędziwiatr M, Budzyński A. Do we really need routine drainage after laparoscopic adrenalectomy and splenectomy? Videosurgery Miniinv. 2012;7:33–9. PubMed PMC

Hora M, Klecka J, Jr, Hes O, et al. Miniinvasive laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy for the parenchymal tumor. Rozhl Chir. 2005;84:246–52. PubMed

Hora M, Klečka J, Eret V, Ferda J. Hilar vascular occlusion during laparoscopic nephrectomy by means of locking clips. Čes Urol. 2007;11:89–92.

Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96. PubMed

Rane A, Rao P, Bonadio F, Rao P. Single port laparoscopic nephrectomy using a novel laparoscopic port (R-Port) and evolution of single laparoscopic port procedure (SLiPP) J Endourol. 2007;21(Suppl. 1):A287.

Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, et al. Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology. 2007;70:1039–42. PubMed

Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M, et al. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU. 2008;101:83–8. PubMed

Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, et al. Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology. 2008;71:3–6. PubMed

Fan X, Lin T, Xu K, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2012;62:601–12. PubMed

Wang L, Liu B, Wu Z, et al. A matched-pair comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy by a single urologist. J Endourol. 2012;26:676–81. PubMed

Greco F, Hoda MR, Mohammed N, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy result in equivalent surgical trauma: preliminary results of a single-centre retrospective controlled study. Eur Urol. 2012;61:1048–53. PubMed

Chlosta P, Drewa T, Obarzanowski M, et al. Do we need a cosmetic effect for radical nephrectomy? Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery would help to answer this question. Videosurgery Miniinv. 2011;6:1–4.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...