Lessons learnt on recruitment and fieldwork from a pilot European human biomonitoring survey
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
25454101
DOI
10.1016/j.envres.2014.08.039
PII: S0013-9351(14)00353-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- DEMO/COPHES, Fieldwork, Human biomonitoring, Lessons learned, Recruitment,
- MeSH
- Electronic Data Processing MeSH
- Environmental Health methods organization & administration standards MeSH
- Informed Consent MeSH
- Interprofessional Relations MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- International Cooperation * MeSH
- Environmental Monitoring methods standards MeSH
- Pilot Projects MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires standards MeSH
- Quality Control MeSH
- Program Development * MeSH
- Guidelines as Topic MeSH
- Research Design legislation & jurisprudence standards MeSH
- Sampling Studies MeSH
- Health Personnel standards MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
Within the European Environment and Health Action Plan an initiative to establish a coherent human biomonitoring approach in Europe was started. The project COPHES (COnsortium to Perform Human biomonitoring on a European Scale ) developed recommendations for a harmonized conduct of a human biomonitoring (HBM) survey which came into action as the pilot study DEMOCOPHES (DEMOnstration of a study to COordinate and Perform Human biomonitoring on a European Scale). Seventeen European countries conducted a survey with harmonized instruments for, inter alia, recruitment, fieldwork and sampling, in autumn/winter 2011/2012. Based on the countries' experiences of conducting the pilot study, following lessons learnt were compiled: the harmonized fieldwork instruments (basic questionnaire, urine and hair sampling) turned out to be very valuable for future HBM surveys on the European scale. A school approach was favoured by most of the countries to recruit school-aged children according to the established guidelines and country specific experiences. To avoid a low participation rate, intensive communication with the involved institutions and possible participants proved to be necessary. The communication material should also include information on exclusion criteria and offered incentives. Telephone contact to the participants the day before fieldwork during the survey can prevent the forgetting of appointments and first morning urine samples. To achieve comparable results on the European scale, training of interviewers in all issues of recruitment, fieldwork and sampling through information material and training sessions is crucial. A survey involving many European countries needs time for preparation and conduct. Materials for quality control prepared for all steps of recruitment, fieldwork and sampling proved to be important to warrant reliable results.
Centre de Recherche Public Gabriel Lippmann Belvaux Luxembourg
Environmental Health Centre Cluj Napoca Romania
Environmental Health Science International Hulst The Netherlands
Environmental Toxicology Centro Nacional de Sanidad Ambiental Madrid Spain
Federal Environment Agency Berlin Germany
Federal Office of Public Health Berne Switzerland
Federal Public Service Health Food Chain Safety and Environment Brussels Belgium
Flemish Institute for Technological Research Mol Belgium
Hainaut Vigilance Sanitaire Mons Belgium
Health Service Executive Environmental Health Department Leitrim Ireland
Institute of Environmental Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Institute of Preventive Medicine Lisbon Faculty of Medicine Lisbon Portugal
Jožef Stefan Institute Ljubljana Slovenia
Laboratoire National de Santé Dudelange Luxembourg
Larnaca General Hospital Ministry of Health Larnaca Cyprus
National Environmental Health Office Health Service Executive Dublin Ireland
National Institute of Environmental Health Budapest Hungary
National Institute of Public Health Prague Czech Republic
Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine Lodz Poland
Public Health Authority of the Slovak Republic Bratislava Slovakia
State General Laboratory Ministry of Health Nicosia Cyprus
References provided by Crossref.org