Ultra high performance supercritical fluid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry for screening of doping agents. I: Investigation of mobile phase and MS conditions
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
25467513
DOI
10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.004
PII: S0003-2670(14)01237-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Doping agents, Make-up solvent, Mobile phase, Ultra high performance liquid chromatography, Ultra high performance supercritical fluid chromatography,
- MeSH
- doping ve sportu * MeSH
- ionty chemie MeSH
- koncentrace vodíkových iontů MeSH
- látky zvyšující výkon analýza normy MeSH
- methanol chemie MeSH
- oxid uhličitý chemie MeSH
- referenční standardy MeSH
- superkritická fluidní chromatografie metody normy MeSH
- tandemová hmotnostní spektrometrie metody normy MeSH
- voda chemie MeSH
- vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie metody normy MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- ionty MeSH
- látky zvyšující výkon MeSH
- methanol MeSH
- oxid uhličitý MeSH
- voda MeSH
The conditions for the analysis of selected doping substances by UHPSFC-MS/MS were optimized to ensure suitable peak shapes and maximized MS responses. A representative mixture of 31 acidic and basic doping agents was analyzed, in both ESI+ and ESI- modes. The best compromise for all compounds in terms of MS sensitivity and chromatographic performance was obtained when adding 2% water and 10mM ammonium formate in the CO2/MeOH mobile phase. Beside mobile phase, the nature of the make-up solvent added for interfacing UHPSFC with MS was also evaluated. Ethanol was found to be the best candidate as it was able to compensate for the negative effect of 2% water addition in ESI- mode and provided a suitable MS response for all doping agents. Sensitivity of the optimized UHPSFC-MS/MS method was finally assessed and compared to the results obtained in conventional UHPLC-MS/MS. Sensitivity was improved by 5-100-fold in UHPSFC-MS/MS vs. UHPLC-MS/MS for 56% of compounds, while only one compound (bumetanide) offered a significantly higher MS response (4-fold) under UHPLC-MS/MS conditions. In the second paper of this series, the optimal conditions for UHPSFC-MS/MS analysis will be employed to screen >100 doping agents in urine matrix and results will be compared to those obtained by conventional UHPLC-MS/MS.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org