In order to improve the h-index in terms of its accuracy and sensitivity to the form of the citation distribution, we propose the new bibliometric index [symbol in text]. The basic idea is to define, for any author with a given number of citations, an "ideal" citation distribution which represents a benchmark in terms of number of papers and number of citations per publication, and to obtain an index which increases its value when the real citation distribution approaches its ideal form. The method is very general because the ideal distribution can be defined differently according to the main objective of the index. In this paper we propose to define it by a "squared-form" distribution: this is consistent with many popular bibliometric indices, which reach their maximum value when the distribution is basically a "square". This approach generally rewards the more regular and reliable researchers, and it seems to be especially suitable for dealing with common situations such as applications for academic positions. To show the advantages of the [symbol in text]-index some mathematical properties are proved and an application to real data is proposed.

Department of Finance VŠB Technical University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic

Dipartimento di Scienze aziendali economiche e metodi quantitativi University of Bergamo Bergamo Italy

See more in PubMed

Hirsch J (2005) An index to quantify an individuals scientific research output. Proceedings of the national Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (46):16569–16572. PubMed PMC

Kongo T (2014) An alternative axiomatization of the Hirsch index. Journal of Informetrics 8:252–258.

Rousseau R (2006) New developments related to the Hirsch index. Science Focus 1:23–25.

Zhang C (2009) The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS ONE 4 (5):e5429. PubMed PMC

Jin BH (2006) H-index: An evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus 1 (1):8–9 (in chinese).

Jin BH, Liang LM, Rousseau R, Egghe L (2007) The R- and AR-indices: complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin 52 (6):885–863.

Egghe L (2006) An improvement of the h-index: The g-index. ISSI Newsletter 2 (1):8–9.

Anderson TR, Hankin RKS, Killworth PD (2008) Beyond the Durfee square: enhancing the h-index to score total publications output. Scientometrics 76 (3):577–588.

Prathap G (2014) The Zynergy-Index and the Formula for the h-Index. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (2):426–427.

Zhang C (2013) The h′-index, effectively improving the h-index based on the citations distribution. PLoS ONE 8 (4):e59912. PubMed PMC

Bertoli-Barsotti L (2013) Improving a decomposition of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (7):1522.

Woeginger GJ (2008) An axiomatic analysis of Egghes g-index. Journal of Informetrics 2:364–368.

Egghe L (2010) The Hirsch index and related impact measures. ARIST 44 (1):65–114.

Marshall AW, Olkin I, Arnold B, (2011) Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Springer, New York, 2nd edition.

Abbas AM (2014) Bounds and inequalities relating h-index, g-index, e-index and generalized impact factor: an improvement over existing models. PLoS ONE 7 (4):e33699. PubMed PMC

Bornmann L (2012) Redundancies in H Index Variants and the Proposal of the Number of Top-Cited Papers as an Attractive Indicator. Measurement 10:149–153.

Bornmann L, Marx W (2013) How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons. EMBO reports 14 (3):226–230. PubMed PMC

Vinkler P (2009) The π-index: a new indicator for assessing scientific impact. Journal of Information Science 35 (5):602–612.

Vinkler P (2010) The πv-index: a new indicator to characterize the impact of journals. Scientometrics 82 (3):461–475.

De Visscher A (2011) What Does the g-Index Really Measure? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 62 (11):2290–2293.

Ali SM, Silvey SD (1966) A general class of coefficients of divergence of one distribution from another. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 28 (1):131–142.

Joe H (1990) Majorization and divergence. Journal of mathematical analysis and applications 148 (2):287–305.

Vinkler P (2007) Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science 33 (4):481–491.

Prathap G (2010) The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index. Scientometrics 84:167–172.

van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2008) Generalizing the h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics 2:263–271.

Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin 1:80–83.