In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
25847441
DOI
10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1
PII: 10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Aculeata, Araneae, Auchenorrhyncha, Coal combustion, Human-made habitats, Orthoptera, Restoration ecology, Syrphidae,
- MeSH
- biodiverzita * MeSH
- členovci účinky léků MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pevné částice chemie MeSH
- popel uhelný analýza MeSH
- prach * MeSH
- půda chemie MeSH
- regenerace a remediace životního prostředí metody MeSH
- zdraví * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Názvy látek
- pevné částice MeSH
- popel uhelný MeSH
- prach * MeSH
- půda MeSH
Recently, fly ash deposits have been revealed as a secondary refuge of critically endangered arthropods specialised on aeolian sands in Central Europe. Simultaneously, these anthropogenic habitats are well known for their negative impact on human health and the surrounding environment. The overwhelming majority of these risks are caused by wind erosion, the substantial decreasing of which is thus necessary. But, any effects of anti-dust treatments on endangered arthropods have never been studied. We surveyed communities of five arthropod groups (wild bees and wasps, leafhoppers, spiders, hoverflies and orthopteroid insects) colonising three fly ash deposits in the western Czech Republic. We focused on two different anti-dust treatments (~70 and 100 % cover of fly ash by barren soil) and their comparison with a control of bare fly ash. Altogether, we recorded 495 species, including 132 nationally threatened species (eight of them were considered to be extinct in the country) and/or 30 species strictly specialised to drift sands. Bees and wasps and leafhoppers contained the overwhelming majority of species of the highest conservation interest; a few other important records were also in spiders and orthopteroids. Total soil cover depleted the unique environment of fly ash and thus destroyed the high conservation potential of the deposits. On the other hand, partial coverage (with ~30 % of bare fly ash) still offered habitats for many of the most threatened species, as we showed by both regression and multivariate analyses, with a decrease of wind erosion. This topic still needs much more research interest, but we consider mosaic-like preservation of smaller spots of fly ash as one of the possible compromises between biodiversity and human health.
Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Vinicna 7 128 44 Prague Czech Republic
Faculty of Science Masaryk University Kotlarska 2 611 37 Brno Czech Republic
Faculty of Science University of Ostrava Chittussiho 10 710 00 Ostrava Czech Republic
Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia Branisovska 31 370 05 Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jan;90(1):43-53 PubMed
Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Mar;174(1-4):187-97 PubMed
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jul;90(10):2943-58 PubMed
Ann Occup Hyg. 1997 Dec;41(6):659-76 PubMed
Toxicol Sci. 2006 Oct;93(2):390-9 PubMed
How can we restore biodiversity and ecosystem services in mining and industrial sites?