Faculty of Arts Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Social and Economic Studies J E Purkyne University Usti nad Labem Czech Republic ; Center for Behavioral Experiments Prague Czech Republic ; Faculty of Business Administration University of Economics Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Abbink K., Herrmann B. (2011). The moral costs of nastiness. Econ. Inq. 49, 631–633 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00309.x DOI

Anderson L., Fryer R., Holt C. (2006). Discrimination: experimental evidence from psychology and economics, in Handbook on the Economics and Discrimination, ed Rogers W. (Cheltenham: Elgar; ), 97–115.

Baay P. E., van Aken M. A., van der Lippe T., de Ridder D. T. (2014). Personality moderates the links of social identity with work motivation and job searching. Front. Psychol. 5:1044. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01044 PubMed DOI PMC

Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econ. Perspect. 12, 151–170 10.1257/jep.12.3.151 DOI

Brandt M. J., IJzerman H., Dijksterhuis A., Farach F. J., Geller J., Giner-Sorolla R., et al. (2013). The replication recipe: what makes for a convincing replication? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 50, 217–224 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005 DOI

Cohn A., Fehr E., Maréchal M. A. (2014). Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature. 516, 86–89. 10.1038/nature13977 PubMed DOI

Dijksterhuis A., van Knippenberg A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 865–877. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.865 PubMed DOI

Furnham A., Hyde G., Trickey G. (2014). The dark side of career preference: dark side traits, motives, and values. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 44, 106–114 10.1111/jasp.12205 DOI

Gill D., Prowse V., Vlassopoulos M. (2013). Cheating in the workplace: an experimental study of the impact of bonuses and productivity. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 96, 120–134 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.09.011 DOI

Gino F., Gu J., Zhong C. B. (2009). Contagion or restitution? When bad apples can motivate ethical behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 1299–1302. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.014 PubMed DOI

Hoff K., Pandey P. (2006). Discrimination, social identity, and durable inequalities. Am. Econ. Rev. 96, 206–211 10.1257/000282806777212611 DOI

John L. K., Loewenstein G., Rick S. I. (2014). Cheating more for less: upward social comparisons motivate the poorly compensated to cheat. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 123, 101–109 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.08.002 DOI

Mazar N., Amir O., Ariely D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self–concept maintenance. J. Mark. Res. 45, 633–644 10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633 DOI

Shih M., Ambady N., Richeson J. A., Fujita K., Gray H. M. (2002). Stereotype performance boosts: the impact of self-relevance and the manner of stereotype activation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83, 638–647. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.638 PubMed DOI

Shih M., Pittinsky T. L., Ambady N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychol. Sci. 10, 80–83 10.1111/1467-9280.00111 PubMed DOI

Smeesters D., Yzerbyt V. Y., Corneille O., Warlop L. (2009). When do primes prime? The moderating role of the self–concept in individuals' susceptibility to priming effects on social behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 211–216 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.002 DOI

Spencer S. J., Steele C. M., Quinn D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35, 4–28 10.1006/jesp.1998.1373 DOI

Stafford T. (2014). The perspectival shift: how experiments on unconscious processing don't justify the claims made for them. Front. Psychol. 5:1067. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01067 PubMed DOI PMC

Steele C. M., Aronson J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 797–811. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 PubMed DOI

Vohs K. D., Mead N. L., Goode M. R. (2008). Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 17, 208–212 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00576.x DOI

A Perspective on Research on Dishonesty: Limited External Validity Due to the Lack of Possibility of Self-Selection in Experimental Designs