• This record comes from PubMed

Genetic and morphological variation in sexual and asexual parasitoids of the genus Lysiphlebus - an apparent link between wing shape and reproductive mode

. 2015 Feb 04 ; 15 () : 5. [epub] 20150204

Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Links

PubMed 25887731
PubMed Central PMC4332431
DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0293-5
PII: 10.1186/s12862-015-0293-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources

BACKGROUND: Morphological divergence often increases with phylogenetic distance, thus making morphology taxonomically informative. However, transitions to asexual reproduction may complicate this relationship because asexual lineages capture and freeze parts of the phenotypic variation of the sexual populations from which they derive. Parasitoid wasps belonging to the genus Lysiphlebus Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) are composed of over 20 species that exploit over a hundred species of aphid hosts, including many important agricultural pests. Within Lysiphlebus, two genetically and morphologically well-defined species groups are recognised: the "fabarum" and the "testaceipes" groups. Yet within each group, sexual as well as asexual lineages occur, and in L. fabarum different morphs of unknown origin and status have been recognised. In this study, we selected a broad sample of specimens from the genus Lysiphlebus to explore the relationship between genetic divergence, reproductive mode and morphological variation in wing size and shape (quantified by geometric morphometrics). RESULTS: The analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences revealed a clear separation between the "testaceipes" and "fabarum" groups of Lysiphlebus, as well as three well-defined phylogenetic lineages within the "fabarum" species group and two lineages within the "testaceipes" group. Divergence in wing shape was concordant with the deep split between the "testaceipes" and "fabarum" species groups, but within groups no clear association between genetic divergence and wing shape variation was observed. On the other hand, we found significant and consistent differences in the shape of the wing between sexual and asexual lineages, even when they were closely related. CONCLUSIONS: Mapping wing shape data onto an independently derived molecular phylogeny of Lysiphlebus revealed an association between genetic and morphological divergence only for the deepest phylogenetic split. In more recently diverged taxa, much of the variation in wing shape was explained by differences between sexual and asexual lineages, suggesting a mechanistic link between wing shape and reproductive mode in these parasitoid wasps.

See more in PubMed

Lande R, Arnold SJ. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution. 1983;37:1210–26. doi: 10.2307/2408842. PubMed DOI

Richardson MK, Chipman AD. Developmental constraints in a comparative framework: a test case using variations in phalanx number during amniote evolution. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2003;296B:8–22. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.13. PubMed DOI

Galis F, Metz JAJ. Evolutionary novelties: the making and breaking of pleiotropic constraints. Integr Comp Biol. 2007;47:409–19. doi: 10.1093/icb/icm081. PubMed DOI

Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution. 2003;57:717–45. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x. PubMed DOI

Losos JB. Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. Am Nat. 2011;177:709–27. doi: 10.1086/660020. PubMed DOI

Losos JB. Ecomorphology, performance capability, and scaling of West Indian Anolis lizards: an evolutionary analysis. Ecol Monograph. 1990;60:369–88. doi: 10.2307/1943062. DOI

Gidaszewski NA, Baylac M, Klingenberg CP. Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-110. PubMed DOI PMC

Drake AG, Klingenberg CP. Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity. Am Nat. 2010;175:289–301. doi: 10.1086/650372. PubMed DOI

Sherratt E, Gower DJ, Klingenberg CP, Wilkinson M. Evolution of cranial shape in caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona) Evol Biol. 2014;41:528–45. doi: 10.1007/s11692-014-9287-2. DOI

Price PW. Evolutionary biology of parasites. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1980.

Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood R. Insects on plants. Community patterns and mechanisms. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1984.

Kavallieratos NG, Tomanović Ž, Starý P, Athanassiou CG, Sarlis GP, Petrović O, et al. A survey of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) of southeastern Europe and their aphid-plant associations. App Entomol Zool. 2004;39:527–63. doi: 10.1303/aez.2004.527. DOI

Starý P. Aphid parasitoids of the Czech Republic. Prague: Academia; 2006.

Starý P, Rakhshani E, Tomanović Ž, Hoelmer K, Kavallieratos NG, Yu J, et al. A new species of Lysiphlebus Förster 1862 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) attacking soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae) from China. J Hymenoptera Res. 2010;19:179–86.

Petrović A, Mitrović M, Starý P, Petrović-Obradović O, Tomanović Ž, Žikić V, et al. Lysiphlebus orientalis, a new invasive parasitoid in Europe – evidence from molecular markers. Bull Entomol Res. 2013;103:451–7. doi: 10.1017/S0007485313000035. PubMed DOI

Ameri M, Rasekh A, Mohammadi Z. A comparison of life history traits of sexual and asexual strains of the parasitoid wasp, Lysiphlebus fabarum (Braconidae: Aphidiinae). Ecol Entomol. 2014. doi:10.1111/een.12155.

Žikić V, Petrović A, Ivanović A. Allometric shape changes indicate significant divergence in the wing shape between asexual and sexual lineages of Lysiphlebus fabarum (Marshall) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Acta Entomol Serbica. 2014;19:53–62.

Cook JM. Sex determination in the Hymenoptera-a review of models and evidence. Heredity. 1993;71:421–35. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1993.157. DOI

Heimpel GE, de Boer JG. Sex determination in the Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 2008;53:209–30. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093441. PubMed DOI

Starý P, Tomanović Ž, Petrović O. A new parasitoid of root-feeding aphids from the Balkan mountains (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Aphidiinae) Deut Entomol Z. 1998;45:175–9. doi: 10.1002/mmnd.19980450206. DOI

Kavallieratos NG, Tomanović Ž. Some rare and endemic aphid parasitoid species (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) from the Balkan Peninsula. Acta Entomol Serbica. 2001;6:121–9.

Belshaw R, Quicke DLJ, Völkl W, Godfray HCJ. Molecular markers indicate rare sex in a predominantly asexual parasitoid wasp. Evolution. 1999;53:1189–99. doi: 10.2307/2640822. PubMed DOI

Starý P. Biology and distribution of microbe-associated thelytokous populations of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Aphidiinae) J Appl Entomol. 1999;123:231–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0418.1999.00345.x. DOI

Sandrock C, Schirrmeister B, Vorburger C. Evolution of reproductive mode variation and host associations in a sexual-asexual complex of aphid parasitoids. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:348. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-348. PubMed DOI PMC

Derocles SAP, Le Ralec A, Plantegenest M, Chaubet B, Cruaud C, Cruaud A, et al. Identification of molecular markers for DNA barcoding in the Aphidiinae (Hym. Braconidae) Mol Ecol Resour. 2012;12:197–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03083.x. PubMed DOI

Gilchrist AS, Azevedo RB, Partridge L, O’Higgins P. Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of Drosophila melanogaster wing shape. Evol Dev. 2000;2:114–24. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2000.00041.x. PubMed DOI

Klingenberg CP, Zaklan SD. Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution. 2000;54:1273–85. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00560.x. PubMed DOI

Klingenberg CP, Badyaev AV, Sowry SM, Beckwith NJ. Inferring developmental modularity from morphological integration: analysis of individual variation and asymmetry in bumblebee wings. Amer Nat. 2001;157:11–23. doi: 10.1086/317002. PubMed DOI

Mitrović M, Petrović A, Kavallieratos NG, Starý P, Petrović-Obradović O, Tomanović Ž, et al. Geographic structure with no evidence for host-associated lineages in European populations of Lysiphlebus testaceipes, an introduced biological control agent. Biol Control. 2013;66:150–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.05.007. DOI

Sandrock C, Vorburger C. Single-locus recessive inheritance of asexual reproduction in a parasitoid wasp. Curr Biol. 2011;21:433–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.070. PubMed DOI

Engelstädter J, Sandrock C, Vorburger C. Contagious parthenogenesis, automixis, and a sex determination meltdown. Evolution. 2011;65:501–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01145.x. PubMed DOI

Carreira VP, Soto IM, Mensch J, Fanara JJ. Genetic basis of wing morphogenesis in Drosophila: sexual dimorphism and non-allometric effects of shape variation. BMC Dev Biol. 2011;11:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-32. PubMed DOI PMC

Kavallieratos NG, Lykouressis DP, Sarlis GP, Stathas GJ, Sanchis-Segovia A, Athanassiou CG. The Aphidiinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea: Braconidae) of Greece. Phytoparasitica. 2001;29:306–40. doi: 10.1007/BF02981847. DOI

Sandrock C, Frauenfelder N, von Burg S, Vorburger C. Microsatellite DNA markers for the aphid parasitoid Lysiphlebus fabarum and their applicability to related species. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7:1080–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01783.x. DOI

Belshaw R, Quicke DLJ. A molecular phylogeny of the Aphidiinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1997;7:281–93. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0400. PubMed DOI

Campbell BC, Steffen–Campbell JD, Werren JH. Phylogeny of the Nasonia species complex (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) inferred froman internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) and 28S rDNA sequences. Insect Mol Biol. 1993;2:225–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1994.tb00142.x. PubMed DOI

Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–9. PubMed

Mahuku GS. A simple extraction method suitable for PCR based analysis of plant, fungal, and bacterial DNA. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2004;22:71–81. doi: 10.1007/BF02773351. DOI

Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang DX, Hewitt GM. Nuclear integrations-challenges for mitochondrial- DNA markers. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:247–51. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10031-8. PubMed DOI

Song H, Buhay JE, Whiting MF, Crandall K. Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:13486–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803076105. PubMed DOI PMC

Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–20. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. PubMed DOI

Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

Posada D, Crandall KA. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:817–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817. PubMed DOI

Tomanović Ž, Kos K, Petrović A, Starý P, Kavallieratos NG, Žikić V, et al. The relationship between molecular variation and variation in the wing shape of three aphid parasitoid species: Aphidius uzbekistanicus Luzhetzki, Aphidius rhopalosiphi De Stefani Perez and Aphidius avenaphis (Fitch) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) Zool Anz. 2013;252:41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcz.2012.03.003. DOI

Rohlf FJ. TpsDig program, version 2.04, ecology and evolution, SUNY at stony brook. New York: State University of New York; 2005.

Sharkey MJ, Wharton RA. Morphology and terminology. In: Wharton RA, Marsh PM, Sharkey MJ, editors. Manual of the new world genera of the family braconidae (hymenoptera). special publication 1. Washington, DC: International Society of Hymenopterists; 1997. pp. 19–37.

Rohlf FJ, Slice E. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool. 1990;39:40–59. doi: 10.2307/2992207. DOI

Dryden IL, Mardia KV. Statistical shape analysis. New York: Wiley; 1998.

Klingenberg CP. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:353–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x. PubMed DOI

SAS Institute Inc: Base SAS® 9.1.3 . Base SAS® 9.1.3. Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute In; 2009.

Martins EP, Hansen TF. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat. 1997;149:646–67. doi: 10.1086/286013. DOI

Rohlf FJ. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution. 2001;55:2143–60. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00731.x. PubMed DOI

Maddison W. Squared-change parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states for continuous-valued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Syst Zool. 1991;40:304–14. doi: 10.2307/2992324. DOI

McArdle B, Rodrigo AG. Estimating the ancestral states of a continuous-valued character using squared-change parsimony: An analytical solution. Syst Biol. 1994;43:573–8. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/43.4.573. DOI

Klingenberg CP, Gidaszewski NA. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Syst Biol. 2010;59:245–61. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syp106. PubMed DOI

Manly BFJ. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997.

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...