Intra-operative defibrillation testing and clinical shock efficacy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: the NORDIC ICD randomized clinical trial
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
26112885
PubMed Central
PMC4589656
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehv292
PII: ehv292
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Defibrillation testing, Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator,
- MeSH
- Defibrillators, Implantable adverse effects standards MeSH
- Electric Countershock adverse effects standards MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Intraoperative Care methods mortality MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Tachycardia mortality therapy MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
AIMS: This trial was designed to test the hypothesis that shock efficacy during follow-up is not impaired in patients implanted without defibrillation (DF) testing during first implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between February 2011 and July 2013, 1077 patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to first time ICD implantation with (n = 540) or without (n = 537) DF testing. The intra-operative DF testing was standardized across all participating centres, and all ICD shocks were programmed to 40 J irrespective of DF test results. The primary end point was the average first shock efficacy (FSE) for all true ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation (VT/VF) episodes during follow-up. The secondary end points included procedural data, serious adverse events, and mortality. During a median follow-up of 22.8 months, the model-based FSE was found to be non-inferior in patients with an ICD implanted without a DF test, with a difference in FSE of 3.0% in favour of the no DF test [confidence interval (CI) -3.0 to 9.0%, Pnon-inferiority <0.001 for the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of -10%). A total of 112 procedure-related serious adverse events occurred within 30 days in 94 patients (17.6%) tested compared with 89 events in 74 patients (13.9%) not tested (P = 0.095). CONCLUSION: Defibrillation efficacy during follow-up is not inferior in patients with a 40 J ICD implanted without DF testing. Defibrillation testing during first time ICD implantation should no longer be recommended for routine left-sided ICD implantation.
Arrhythmia Department Skane University Hospital Lund Sweden
Department of Cardiology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
Department of Internal Medicine 1 Cardiology Faculty Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Internal Medicine Cardiology DRK Hospital Mölln Ratzeburg Ratzeburg Germany
See more in PubMed
Russo AM, Chung MK. Is defribrillation testing necessary? Cardiol Clin 2014;32:211–224. PubMed
Pires LA, Johnson KM. Intraoperative testing of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: how much is enough? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:140–145. PubMed
Christ G, Becker R, Voss F, Kelemen K, Senges-Becker J, Hauck M, Schoels W, Bald I, Katus H, Bauer A. Indications for predismissal testing with arrhythmia-induction in patients receiving an implatable cardioverter defibrillator. Clin Res Cardiol 2007;96:613–620. PubMed
Brignole M, Raciti G, Bongiorni MG, De Martino G, Favale S, Gasparini M, Luise R, Occhetta E, Proclemer A. Defibrillation testing at the time of implantation of cardioverter defibrillator in the clinical practice: a nation-wide survey. Europace 2007;9:540–543. PubMed
Healey JS, Dorian P, Mitchell LB, Talajic M, Philippon F, Simpson C, Yee R, Morillo CA, Lamy A, Basta M, Birnie DH, Wang X, Nair GM, Crystal E, Kerr CR, Connolly SJ, CREDIT Investigators. Canadian Registry of ICD Implant Testing procedures (CREDIT): current practice, risks, and costs of intraoperative defibrillation testing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010;21:177–182. PubMed
Brignole M, Occhetta E, Bongiorni MG, Proclemer A, Favale S, Iacopino S, Calὸ L, Vado A, Buja G, Mascioli G, Quartieri F, Tritto M, Parravicini U, Castro A, Tomasi C, Villani GQ, D'Acri MG, Klersy C, Gasparini M, SAFE-ICD Study Investigators. Clinical evaluation of defibrillation testing in an unselected population of 2,120 consecutive patients undergoing first implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:981–987. PubMed
Swerdlow CD, Russo AM, Degroot PJ. The dilemma of ICD implant testing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007;30:675–700. PubMed
Bänsch D, Kottkamp H, Grönefeld G, Vogt J, Israel C, Böcker D, Hindricks G, Kuck KH, Quick-ICD Investigators. The quick-implantable-defibrillator trial . Europace 2007;9:1144–1150. PubMed
Smits K, Virag N, Swerdlow CD. Impact of defibrillation testing on predicted ICD shock efficacy: implications for clinical practice. Heart Rhythm 2013;10:709–717. PubMed
Shukla HH, Flaker GC, Jayam V, Roberts D. High defibrillation thresholds in transvenous biphasic implantable defibrillators: clinical predictors and prognostic implications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003;26:44–48. PubMed
Blatt JA, Poole JE, Johnson GW, Callans DJ, Raitt MH, Reddy RK, Marchlinski FE, Yee R, Guarnieri T, Talajic M, Wilber DJ, Anderson J, Chung K, Wong WS, Mark DB, Lee KL, Bardy GH, SCD-HeFT Investigators. No benefits from defibrillation threshold testing in the SCD-HeFT (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial) . J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:551–556. PubMed
Healey JS, Hohnloser SH, Glikson M, Neuzner J, Mabo P, Vinolas X, Kautzner J, O'Hara G, VanErven L, Gadler F, Pogue J, Appl U, Gilkerson J, Pochet T, Stein KM, Merkely B, Chrolavicius S, Meeks B, Foldesi C, Thibault B, Connolly SJ, Shockless IMPLant Evaluation (SIMPLE) Investigators. Cardioverter defibrillator implantation without induction of ventricular fibrillation: a single-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (SIMPLE). Lancet 2015;385:785–791. PubMed
Bänsch D, Bonnemeier H, Brandt J, Bode F, Svendsen JH, Felk A, Hauser T, Wegscheider K, NORDIC ICD Trial Investigators. The NO Regular Defibrillation testing In Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation (NORDIC ICD) trial: concept and design of a randomized, controlled trial of intra-operative defibrillation testing during de novo defibrillator implantation. Europace 2015;17:142–147. PubMed
Epstein AE, Carlson MD, Fogoros RN, Higgins SL, Venditti FJ., Jr Classification of death in antiarrhythmia trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:433–442. PubMed
Russo AM, Sauer W, Gerstenfeld EP, Hsia HH, Lin D, Cooper JM, Dixit S, Verdino RJ, Nayak HM, Callans DJ, Patel V, Marchlinski FE. Defibrillation threshold testing: is it really necessary at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion? Heart Rhythm 2005;2:456–461. PubMed
Osswald BR, De Simone R, Most S, Tochtermann U, Tanzeem A, Karck M. High defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable defibrillator: how effective is the subcutaneous finger lead? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:489–492. PubMed
Healey JS, Gula LJ, Birnie DH, Sterns L, Connolly SJ, Sapp J, Crystal E, Simpson C, Exner DV, Kus T, Philippon F, Wells G, Tang AS. A randomized-controlled pilot study comparing ICD implantation with and without intraoperative defibrillation testing in patients with heart failure and severe left ventricular dysfunction: a substudy of the RAFT trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012;23:1313–1316. PubMed
Aoukar PS, Poole JE, Johnson GW, Anderson J, Hellkamp AS, Mark DB, Lee KL, Bardy GH. No benefit of a dual coil over a single coil ICD lead: evidence from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial. Heart Rhythm 2013;10:970–976. PubMed
Leong-Sit P, Gula LJ, Diamantouros P, Krahn AD, Skanes AC, Yee R, Klein GJ. Effect of defibrillation testing on management during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. Am Heart J 2008;152:1104–1108. PubMed
Mainigi SK, Cooper JM, Russo AM, Nayak HM, Lin D, Dixit S, Gerstenfeld EP, Hsia HH, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE, Verdino RJ. Elevated defibrillation thresholds in patients undergoing biventricular defibrillator implantation: incidence and predictors. Heart Rhythm 2006;3:1010–1016. PubMed
Day JD, Olshansky B, Moore S, Brown S, Stolen KQ, Lerew DR, INTRINSIC RV Study Investigators. High defibrillation energy requirements are encountered rarely with modern dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems. Europace 2008;10:347–350. PubMed
Sauer WH, Lowery CM, Bargas RL, Schuller JL, Stees CS, Aleong RG, Varosy PD. Utility of postoperative testing of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011;34:186–192. PubMed
Vischer AS, Sticherling C, Kühne MS, Osswald S, Schaer BA. Role of defibrillation threshold testing in the contemporary defibrillator patient population. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2013;24:437–441. PubMed
Lin EF, Dalal D, Cheng A, Marine JE, Nazarian S, Sinha S, Spragg DD, Tandri H, Halperin H, Calkins H, Berger RD, Tomaselli GF, Henrikson CA. Predictors of high defibrillation threshold in the modern era. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2013;36:231–237. PubMed
Hsu JC, Marcus GM, Al-Khatib SM, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Sood N, Parker MW, Kluger J, Lampert R, Russo AM. Predictors of an inadequate defibrillation safety margin at ICD implantation: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:256–264. PubMed
Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, Domanski M, Troutman C, Anderson J, Johnson G, McNulty SE, Clapp-Channing N, Davidson-Ray LD, Fraulo ES, Fishbein DP, Luceri RM, Ip JH; Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) Investigators. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005;352:225–237. PubMed
Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Brown MW, Andrews ML; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:877–883. PubMed