• This record comes from PubMed

Occurrence of perchloroethylene in surface water and fish in a river ecosystem affected by groundwater contamination

. 2016 Mar ; 23 (6) : 5676-92. [epub] 20151118

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Links

PubMed 26578381
DOI 10.1007/s11356-015-5806-7
PII: 10.1007/s11356-015-5806-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Long-term monitoring of the content of perchloroethylene (PCE) in a river ecosystem affected by groundwater contamination was performed at a site in the Czech Republic. The quality of surface water was monitored quarterly between 1994 and 2013, and fish were collected from the affected ecosystem to analyse the content of PCE in their tissue in 1998, 2011 and 2012. Concentrations of PCE (9-140 μg/kg) in the tissue of fish collected from the contaminated part of the river were elevated compared to the part of the river unaffected by the contamination (ND to 5 μg/kg PCE). The quality of surface water has improved as a result of groundwater remediation during the evaluated period. Before the remedial action, PCE concentrations ranged from 30 to 95 μg/L (1994-1997). Following commencement of remedial activities in September 1997, a decrease in the content of PCE in the surface water to 7.3 μg/L (1998) and further to 1 μg/L (2011) and 1.1 μg/L (2012) led to a progressive decrease in the average concentration of PCE in the fish muscle tissue from 79 μg/kg (1998) to 24 (2011) and 30 μg/kg (2012), respectively. It was determined that the bioconcentration of PCE does not have a linear dependence because the decrease in contamination in the fish muscle tissue is not directly proportional to the decrease in contamination in the river water. The observed average bioconcentration factors were 24 and 28 for the lower concentrations of PCE and 11 for the higher concentrations of PCE in the river. In terms of age, length and weight of the collected fish, weight had the greatest significance for bioconcentration, followed by the length, with age being evaluated as a less significant factor.

See more in PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Jul;20(7):4484-95 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2012 Mar;162:120-8 PubMed

Biodegradation. 2004 Dec;15(6):371-86 PubMed

Microbes Environ. 2014;29(1):23-30 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2007 Aug;68(9):1707-15 PubMed

Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006 Jun;17(3):274-84 PubMed

Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Jan 1;41(1):74-81 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Feb;20(2):834-47 PubMed

Mar Pollut Bull. 2007;55(10-12):469-84 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2010 Jul;80(5):554-62 PubMed

Bioresour Technol. 2010 Dec;101(24):9728-33 PubMed

Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003 Feb;13(2):57-149 PubMed

Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Oct 16;46(20):10918-25 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 1997 Oct 1;204(3):205-14 PubMed

Science. 1997 Jun 6;276(5318):1568-71 PubMed

Water Res. 2011 Apr;45(8):2607-15 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012 Jul;19(6):1994-2006 PubMed

Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Feb 1;43(3):690-7 PubMed

Environ Monit Assess. 2006 Dec;123(1-3):249-58 PubMed

Environ Geochem Health. 2013 Aug;35(4):535-49 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Feb;68(2):485-95 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2011 Dec 1;410-411:136-45 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2005 Jan;133(2):343-50 PubMed

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2005 Jun;61(2):256-67 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...