Effects of land use on taxonomic and functional diversity: a cross-taxon analysis in a Mediterranean landscape

. 2016 Aug ; 181 (4) : 959-70. [epub] 20151210

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid26658737
Odkazy

PubMed 26658737
DOI 10.1007/s00442-015-3512-2
PII: 10.1007/s00442-015-3512-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Land-use change is the major driver of biodiversity loss. However, taxonomic diversity (TD) and functional diversity (FD) might respond differently to land-use change, and this response might also vary depending on the biotic group being analysed. In this study, we compare the TD and FD of four biotic groups (ants, birds, herbaceous, woody vegetation) among four land-use types that represent a gradient of land-use intensity in a Mediterranean landscape (Mediterranean shrublands, dehesas, mixed-pine forests, olive groves). Analyses were performed separately at two different spatial scales: the sampling unit scale and the site scale. Land-use intensity effects on TD and FD were quite different and highly varied among the four biotic groups, with no single clear pattern emerging that could be considered general for all organisms. Additive partitioning of species diversity revealed clear contrasting patterns between TD and FD in the percentage of variability observed at each spatial scale. While most variability in TD was found at the larger scales, irregardless of organism group and land-use type, most variability in FD was found at the smallest scale, indicating that species turnover among communities is much greater than functional trait turnover. Finally, we found that TD and FD did not vary consistently, but rather followed different trajectories that largely depended on the biotic group and the intensity of land-use transformation. Our results highlight that the relationship of land use with TD and FD is highly complex and context-dependent.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Oecologia. 2011 Sep;167(1):181-8 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2009 Jan;12(1):22-33 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 26;104(52):20684-9 PubMed

Oecologia. 1995 Oct;104(2):246-255 PubMed

Oecologia. 2005 Jan;142(3):353-9 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 7;276(1658):903-9 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 13;104(11):4461-6 PubMed

Oecologia. 2001 Dec;129(4):624-628 PubMed

J Theor Biol. 2012 May 7;300:48-56 PubMed

Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):463-72 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2006 Jun;9(6):741-58 PubMed

Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):299-305 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2015 Aug;18(8):834-43 PubMed

J Anim Ecol. 2007 Sep;76(5):977-85 PubMed

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):269-88 PubMed

Conserv Biol. 2008 Feb;22(1):70-9 PubMed

Oecologia. 2010 Apr;162(4):965-76 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...