Evolution of human cytomegalovirus-seronegative donor/-seropositive recipient high-risk combination frequency in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations at Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion during 1995-2014
Language English Country Denmark Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
26858009
DOI
10.1111/tid.12508
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, graft donor, human cytomegalovirus, recipient, seroprevalence,
- MeSH
- Virus Activation immunology MeSH
- Cytomegalovirus Infections epidemiology virology MeSH
- Cytomegalovirus physiology MeSH
- Tissue Donors MeSH
- Immunocompromised Host MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic epidemiology MeSH
BACKGROUND: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) establishes lifelong latent infection that can result in severe life-threatening disease in immunosuppressed patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). An HCMV-seropositive transplant recipient who receives a graft from a seronegative donor (R+/D-) is at high risk of recurrent HCMV reactivation. METHODS: To assess the incidence of R+/D- combination, we retrospectively evaluated HCMV-seronegative donors for 746 allogeneic HSCT treatments carried out at our center during 1995-2014. In our cohort, 20% HCMV-seronegative HSCT recipients, 21% HCMV-seronegative related graft donors, and 52% HCMV-seronegative unrelated graft donors were included. RESULTS: Analyses of the HCMV serostatus of hematopoietic stem cell donors during 2 consecutive calendar periods (1995-2005 and 2006-2014) showed a significant increase in the proportion of seronegative donors (odds ratio [OR] = 1.947). In addition, the number of HSCT treatments using an unrelated donor increased (OR = 2.376). Finally, the use of grafts from countries with a very low HCMV prevalence increased. CONCLUSION: This increase in HCMV seronegativity in unrelated donors and the increased proportion of unrelated donors were responsible for the increased occurrence of the high-risk combination R+/D- (OR = 1.680). If the reduction in the rate of HCMV-seropositive graft donors continues, an increased frequency of HCMV reactivation events in our transplant recipients can be expected, because of the increasing occurrence of the high-risk R+/D- combination.
Department of Immunology Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czech Republic
Transplantation Ward Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org