• This record comes from PubMed

Preliminary investigation on the effect of earthworm and vegetation for sludge treatment in sludge treatment reed beds system

. 2016 Jun ; 23 (12) : 11957-63. [epub] 20160309

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article

Links

PubMed 26961527
DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-6399-5
PII: 10.1007/s11356-016-6399-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Sewage sludge treatment is becoming one of the most significant challenges for domestic wastewater management. Optimization of sludge management for reducing sludge handling cost in wastewater treatment plant is highly demanded. Sludge treatment reed bed system (STRB) is an eco-environmentally friendly technology which has a low investment input and reduced costs for operation and maintenance. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of earthworm assistant STRB in terms of sludge dewatering and stabilization of surplus sludge. The results show that draining and evapotranspiration (ET) take the main role for sludge dewatering; with maximum of 77 and 43 % water was removed through draining and ET, respectively. Plants improved ET rate up to 13.1 % in the planted STRB compare with the unplanted STRB. The combination of plants and earthworms increased ET rate of 20.9 % more than the control STRB (unplanted without earthworms). The planted STRB with earthworm reached the lowest water content in accumulated sludge of 46 %. There was a systematic increase of total solids (TS) concentration from 0.5 % in the influent to 25-54 % in the accumulated sludge. Earthworms enhanced the sludge stabilization dramatic with the ratio of volatile solids (VS)/TS decreased from 49 % in the influent to 18 % in the accumulated sludge in the earthworm assistant STRB. The results demonstrated a good efficiency for sludge dewatering and stabilization with the assistant of earthworms in STRBs, which can be an alternative technology for sludge treatment in wastewater treatment plants.

See more in PubMed

Water Res. 2012 Oct 15;46(16):5305-15 PubMed

Water Res. 2011 Dec 1;45(19):6441-52 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2013 Mar 1;447:361-9 PubMed

Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jan;101(1):51-7 PubMed

Water Sci Technol. 2007;56(3):175-82 PubMed

Bioresour Technol. 2010 May;101(9):2905-12 PubMed

Water Sci Technol. 2013;68(2):335-41 PubMed

Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(11):2881-8 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Sep;20(9):5922-9 PubMed

Water Sci Technol. 2002;46(10):153-8 PubMed

Biotechnol Adv. 2003 Dec;22(1-2):93-117 PubMed

J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2011;46(7):800-4 PubMed

Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(5):101-9 PubMed

J Environ Manage. 2012 Mar;95 Suppl:S158-64 PubMed

J Hazard Mater. 2012 May 30;217-218:263-70 PubMed

Water Res. 2014 Dec 1;66:85-98 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2013 Jun;92(2):201-6 PubMed

J Environ Sci (China). 2008;20(4):385-9 PubMed

Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(2):283-90 PubMed

Water Res. 2010 Apr;44(8):2572-82 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...