The widely accepted two-dimensional circumplex model of emotions posits that most instances of human emotional experience can be understood within the two general dimensions of valence and activation. Currently, this model is facing some criticism, because complex emotions in particular are hard to define within only these two general dimensions. The present theory-driven study introduces an innovative analytical approach working in a way other than the conventional, two-dimensional paradigm. The main goal was to map and project semantic emotion space in terms of mutual positions of various emotion prototypical categories. Participants (N = 187; 54.5% females) judged 16 discrete emotions in terms of valence, intensity, controllability and utility. The results revealed that these four dimensional input measures were uncorrelated. This implies that valence, intensity, controllability and utility represented clearly different qualities of discrete emotions in the judgments of the participants. Based on this data, we constructed a 3D hypercube-projection and compared it with various two-dimensional projections. This contrasting enabled us to detect several sources of bias when working with the traditional, two-dimensional analytical approach. Contrasting two-dimensional and three-dimensional projections revealed that the 2D models provided biased insights about how emotions are conceptually related to one another along multiple dimensions. The results of the present study point out the reductionist nature of the two-dimensional paradigm in the psychological theory of emotions and challenge the widely accepted circumplex model.

Olomouc University Social Health Institute Palacky University in Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Science and Research Department Prague College of Psychosocial Studies Palacky University in OlomoucOlomouc Czech Republic; Health Psychology Unit Institute of Public Health Medical Faculty P J Safarik UniversityKosice Slovakia

Science and Research Department Prague College of Psychosocial Studies Prague Czech Republic

Science and Research Department Prague College of Psychosocial Studies Prague Czech Republic; Faculty of Humanities Charles University PraguePrague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Aznar A., Tenenbaum H. R. (2013). Spanish parents' emotion talk and their children's understanding of emotion. Front. Psychol. 4:670. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00670 PubMed DOI PMC

Bayer M., Schacht A. (2014). Event-related brain responses to emotional words, pictures, and faces – a cross-domain comparison. Front. Psychol. 5:1106. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01106 PubMed DOI PMC

Boutonnet B., McClain R., Thierry G. (2014). Compound words prompt arbitrary semantic associations in conceptual memory. Front. Psychol. 5:222. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00222 PubMed DOI PMC

Busing F. (1998). Proxscal. User's Guide for Version 6.3 Data Theory Scaling System Group. Leiden: Leiden University.

Busing F. M. T. A., Commandeur J. J. F., Heiser W. J. (1997). PROXSCAL: a multidimensional scaling program for individual differences scaling with constraints, in Softstat '97: Advances in Statistical Software, eds Bandilla W., Faulbaum F. (Stutgart: Lucius; ), 237–258.

Crutch S. J., Troche J., Reilly J., Ridgway G. R. (2013). Abstract conceptual feature ratings: the role of emotion, magnitude, and other cognitive domains in the organization of abstract conceptual knowledge. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:186. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00186 PubMed DOI PMC

Faucher L., Tappolet C. (2008). Facts and values in emotional plasticity, in Facts and Value in Emotion, eds Charland L. C., Zachar P. (Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company; ), 101–137.

Fisher J. E., Miller G. A., Sass S. M., Silton R. L., Edgar J. C., Stewart J. L., et al. . (2014). Neural correlates of suspiciousness and interactions with anxiety during emotional and neutral word processing. Front. Psychol. 5:596. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00596 PubMed DOI PMC

Fontaine J. R. J., Scherer K. R. (2013). The global meaning structure of the emotion domain: investigating the complementarity of multiple perspectives on meaning, in Components of Emotional Meaning: A Sourcebook, eds Fontaine J. R. J., Scherer K. R., Soriano C. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 106–125.

Fontaine J. R. J., Scherer K. R., Roesch E. B., Ellsworth P. C. (2007). The world of emotions is not two-dimensional. Psychol. Sci. 18, 1050–1057. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.x PubMed DOI

Gallant S. N., Yang L. (2014). Positivity effect in source attributions of arousal-matched emotional and non-emotional words during item-based directed forgetting. Front. Psychol. 5:1334. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01334 PubMed DOI PMC

Gerdes A. B. M., Wieser M. J., Bublatzky F., Kusay A., Plichta M. M., Alpers G. W. (2013). Emotional sounds modulate early neural processing of emotional pictures. Front. Psychol. 4:741. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00741 PubMed DOI PMC

Grol M., De Raedt R. (2014). Effects of positive mood on attentional breadth for emotional stimuli. Front. Psychol. 5:1277. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01277 PubMed DOI PMC

Grühn D., Lumley M. A., Diehl M., Labouvie-Vief G. (2013). Time-based indicators of emotional complexity: interrelations and correlates. Emotion 13, 226–237. 10.1037/a0030363 PubMed DOI PMC

Hupka R. B., Lenton A. P., Hutchinson K. A. (1999). Universal development of emotion categories in natural language. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77, 247–278. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.247 DOI

Jensen T. W. (2014). Emotion in languaging: languaging as affective, adaptive, and flexible behavior in social interaction. Front. Psychol. 5:720. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00720 PubMed DOI PMC

Kruskal J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a non-metric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29, 1–27. 10.1007/BF02289565 DOI

Kuehnast M., Wagner V., Wassiliwizky E., Jacobsen T., Menninghaus W. (2014). Being moved: linguistic representation and conceptual structure. Front. Psychol. 5:1242. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01242 PubMed DOI PMC

Kunzmann U., Kappes C., Wrosch C. (2014). Emotional aging: a discrete emotions perspective. Front. Psychol. 5:380. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00380 PubMed DOI PMC

Kuppens P., Tuerlinckx F., Russell J. A., Feldman Barrett L. (2013). The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience. Psychol. Bull. 139, 917–940. 10.1037/a0030811 PubMed DOI

Larsen R. J., Diener E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion emotion, in Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 13, ed Clark M. S. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.), 25–59.

Murín I. (2014). Visualisation of intangible data of the cultural heritage in field research and hermeneutic analysis. Ethn. Actual. 14, 60–77. 10.2478/eas-2014-0004 DOI

Oosterwijk S., Rotteveel M., Fischer A. H., Hess U. (2009). Embodied emotion concepts: how generating words about pride and disappointment influences posture. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 39, 457–466. 10.1002/ejsp.584 DOI

Parkinson B., Fisher A. H., Manstead A. S. R. (2005). Emotion in Social Relations: Cultural, Group, and Interpersonal Processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Reilly J., Seibert L. (2003). Language and emotion, in Handbook of Affective Science, eds Davidson R. J., Scherer K. R., Goldsmith H. H. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 535–559.

Reisenzein R., Schimmack U. (1999). Similarity judgments and covariations of affects: findings and implications for affect structure research. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25, 539–556. 10.1177/0146167299025005001 DOI

Roberts J. S., Wedell D. G. (1994). Context effects on similarity judgments of multidimensional stimuli: inferring the structure of the emotion space. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30, 1–38. 10.1006/jesp.1994.1001 DOI

Rohlf H. L., Krahé B. (2015). Assessing anger regulation in middle childhood: development and validation of a behavioral observation measure. Front. Psychol. 6:453. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00453 PubMed DOI PMC

Russell J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 1161–1178. 10.1037/h0077714 DOI

Russell J. A., Lemay G. (2000). Emotion concepts, in Handbook of Emotions, eds Lewis M., Haviland-Jones J. M. (New York, NY: Guilford Press; ), 491–503.

Scherer K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Soc. Sci. Inform. 44, 695–729. 10.1177/0539018405058216 DOI

Scherer K. R. (2013). Measuring the meaning of emotion words: a domain-specific componential approach, in Components of Emotional Meaning: A Sourcebook, eds Fontaine J. R. J., Scherer K. R., Soriano C. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 7–30.

Schindler S., Wegrzyn M., Steppacher I., Kissler J. (2014). It's all in your head – how anticipating evaluation affects the processing of emotional trait adjectives. Front. Psychol. 5:1292. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01292 PubMed DOI PMC

Sokolov E. N., Boucsein W. (2000). A psychophysiological model of emotion space. Integr. Physiol. Behav. Sci. 35, 81–119. 10.1007/BF02688770 PubMed DOI

Storm C., Storm T. (2005). The English lexicon of interpersonal affect: love, etc. Cogn. Emot. 19, 333–356. 10.1080/02699930441000210 PubMed DOI

Trnka R. (2013). How many dimensions does emotional experience have? The theory of multi-dimensional emotional experience, in Re-Constructing Emotional Spaces: From Experience to Regulation, eds Trnka R., Balcar K., Kuška M. (Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing; ), 45–55.

Troche J., Crutch S., Reilly J. (2014). Clustering, hierarchical organization, and the topography of abstract and concrete nouns. Front. Psychol. 5:360. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00360 PubMed DOI PMC

Verhees M. W., Chwilla D. J., Tromp J., Vissers C. T. (2015). Contributions of emotional state and attention to the processing of syntactic agreement errors: evidence from P600. Front. Psychol. 6:388. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00388 PubMed DOI PMC

Watson D., Tellegen A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychol. Bull. 98, 219–235. 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219 PubMed DOI

Yu J., Tseng P., Muggleton N. G., Juan C. H. (2015). Being watched by others eliminates the effect of emotional arousal on inhibitory control. Front. Psychol. 6:4. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00004 PubMed DOI PMC

Free Associations Mirroring Self- and World-Related Concepts: Implications for Personal Construct Theory, Psycholinguistics and Philosophical Psychology