Sex allocation and secondary sex ratio in Cuban boa (Chilabothrus angulifer): mother's body size affects the ratio between sons and daughters
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
27216175
DOI
10.1007/s00114-016-1369-9
PII: 10.1007/s00114-016-1369-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Litter sex ratio, Sex allocation, Sexual size dimorphism, Snakes,
- MeSH
- analýza rozptylu MeSH
- Boidae anatomie a histologie fyziologie MeSH
- poměr pohlaví * MeSH
- rozmnožování MeSH
- velikost těla * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Secondary sex ratios of animals with genetically determined sex may considerably deviate from equality. These deviations may be attributed to several proximate and ultimate factors. Sex ratio theory explains some of them as strategic decisions of mothers improving their fitness by selective investment in sons or daughters, e.g. local resource competition hypothesis (LRC) suggests that philopatric females tend to produce litters with male-biased sex ratios to avoid future competition with their daughters. Until now, only little attention has been paid to examine predictions of sex ratio theory in snakes possessing genetic sex determination and exhibiting large variance in allocation of maternal investment. Cuban boa is an endemic viviparous snake producing large-bodied newborns (∼200 g). Extremely high maternal investment in each offspring increases importance of sex allocation. In a captive colony, we collected breeding records of 42 mothers, 62 litters and 306 newborns and examined secondary sex ratios (SR) and sexual size dimorphism (SSD) of newborns. None of the examined morphometric traits of neonates appeared sexually dimorphic. The sex ratio was slightly male biased (174 males versus 132 females) and litter sex ratio significantly decreased with female snout-vent length. We interpret this relationship as an additional support for LRC as competition between mothers and daughters increases with similarity of body sizes between competing snakes.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 22;282(1821):20151992 PubMed
Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1021-2 PubMed
Am Nat. 2011 May;177(5):617-29 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Aug 22;271(1549):1723-8 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 22;272(1565):859-64 PubMed
Biol Reprod. 2004 Oct;71(4):1063-70 PubMed
Science. 1978 Jul 14;201(4351):163-5 PubMed
Evolution. 1992 Oct;46(5):1549-1552 PubMed
Naturwissenschaften. 2007 Feb;94(2):122-7 PubMed
Oecologia. 2010 Oct;164(2):369-78 PubMed
Oecologia. 2009 Apr;159(4):689-96 PubMed
J Theor Biol. 2000 Oct 7;206(3):445-7 PubMed
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Nov;78(4):553-74 PubMed
J Hered. 2011 Nov-Dec;102(6):759-63 PubMed
Sex Dev. 2010;4(1-2):110-8 PubMed
Zoo Biol. 2013 Mar;32(2):172-6 PubMed
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Jun;22(6):292-7 PubMed
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Jan;34(1):167-80 PubMed
Biol Lett. 2007 Apr 22;3(2):131-3 PubMed
Oecologia. 1992 Oct;92 (1):40-47 PubMed
Am J Hum Biol. 2006 Nov-Dec;18(6):806-21 PubMed
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Sep;68(3):461-70 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 May 7;271 Suppl 4:S230-2 PubMed
Biol Lett. 2011 Apr 23;7(2):253-6 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 7;275(1632):323-7 PubMed
Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90-2 PubMed
Evolution. 2006 Jan;60(1):115-22 PubMed
J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol. 2005 Jul 1;303(7):598-607 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 7;268(1480):2001-5 PubMed
Oecologia. 1996 Apr;106(1):100-110 PubMed
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 May 12;363(1497):1675-86 PubMed
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2009;80(5):341-52 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 22;269(1495):1067-72 PubMed
J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2007 Sep 1;307(9):500-8 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Feb 7;273(1584):293-9 PubMed
Parasitology. 2007 Nov;134(Pt 12):1709-17 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2011 May;20(9):1870-6 PubMed
Integr Comp Biol. 2013 Dec;53(6):877-87 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2008 Aug;17(15):3506-14 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Oct 7;274(1624):2491-6 PubMed
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2009 Jul;63(9):1307-1317 PubMed
Biol Lett. 2007 Feb 22;3(1):33-5 PubMed
J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol. 2006 Aug 1;305(8):603-9 PubMed
J Anim Ecol. 2010 May;79(3):640-9 PubMed
Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Sep;107(3):231-8 PubMed
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Jul 27;363(1502):2393-413 PubMed
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e22199 PubMed
Oecologia. 2002 May;131(3):418-426 PubMed
Curr Biol. 2011 Oct 25;21(20):1744-7 PubMed
Am Nat. 2007 Nov;170(5):E112-28 PubMed
Ecol Evol. 2013 Nov;3(13):4401-7 PubMed