The abolition of user charges and the demand for ambulatory visits: evidence from the Czech Republic
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
27422120
PubMed Central
PMC4947065
DOI
10.1186/s13561-016-0105-7
PII: 10.1186/s13561-016-0105-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Co-payments, Czech Republic, Natural experiment, Outpatient care, Zero-inflated negative binomial model (ZINB),
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
This paper estimates the effect of the abolition of user charges for children's outpatient care (30 CZK/1.2 EUR) in 2009 on the demand for ambulatory doctor visits in the Czech Republic. Because the reform applied only to children, we can employ the difference-in-differences approach, where children constitute a treatment group and adults serve as a control group. The dataset covers 1841 observations. Aside from the treatment effect, we control for a number of personal characteristics using micro-level data (European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions). Using the zero-inflated negative binomial model, we found no significant effect from the abolition of user charges on doctor visits, suggesting either that user charges are ineffective in the Czech environment or that their value was set too low. On the contrary, personal income, the number of household members and gender have a significant effect. A number of robustness checks using restricted samples confirm the results.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Augurzky B, Bauer T, Schaffner S. Copayments in the German health system: Does it work? RWI Discuss Pap Ser. 2006;43:1–14.
Baji P, Pavlova M, Gulasci L, Groot W. User fees for public health care services in hungary: Expectations, experience, and acceptability from the perspectives of different stakeholders. Health Policy. 2011;102:255–62. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.03.001. PubMed DOI
Chiappori P, Durand F, Geoffard P. Moral hazard and the demand for physician services: first lessons from a French natural experiment. Eur Econ Rev. 1998;42(3–5):499–511. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00015-4. DOI
Cockx B, Brasseur C. The demand for physician services: Evidence from a natural experiment. J Health Econ. 2003;22(6):881–913. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00047-X. PubMed DOI
CZSO. Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC).Czech Statistical Office; 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:EU_statistics_on_income_and_living_conditions_(EU-SILC). PubMed
Feldstein P. Health care economics. Cengage Learning. 2011. http://www.cengage.com/search/productOverview.do?N=0&Ntk=P_Isbn13&Ntt=9781111313265&Ntx=mode%2Bmatchallpartial.
Gertler P, Gaag J. The willingness to pay for medical care: Evidence from two developing countries/Paul Gertler, Jacques van der Gaag. Baltimore: Published for the World Bank [by] Johns Hopkins University Press; 1990.
Gruber J, Kaiser HJ. The role of consumer copayments for health care. Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment and beyond: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2006. http://kff.org/health-costs/report/the-role-of-consumer-copayments-for-health/.
Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic. Zdravotnictvi CR 2011 ve statistickych udajich. Technical report, UZIS CR; 2012. http://www.uzis.cz/publikace/zdravotnictvi-cr-2011-ve-statistickych-udajich.
Kalnicka V. Vydaje domacnosti na zdravotni peci. Statistika my. 2013;5:28–29.
Kalousova L. Curing over-use by prescribing fees: An evaluation of the effect of user fees’ implementation on healthcare use in the Czech Republic. Health Policy Plan. 2014:1–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24790063. PubMed PMC
Kan M, Suzuki W. Effects of cost sharing on the demand for physician services in Japan: Evidence from a natural experiment. Jpn World Econ. 2010;22(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.japwor.2009.06.005. DOI
Kim J, Ko S, Yang B. The effects of patient cost sharing on ambulatory utilization in South Korea. Health Policy. 2005;72(3):293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.09.002. PubMed DOI
Long JS, Freese J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. StataCorp. 2006. http://www.stata.com/bookstore/regression-models-categorical-dependent-variables/.
Lundberg L, Johannesson M, Isacson D, Borgquist L. Effects of user charges on the use of prescription medicines in different socio-economic groups. Health Policy. 1998;44(2):123–34. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00009-8. PubMed DOI
Manning W, Newhouse J, Duan N, Keeler E, Leibowitz A. Health insurance the demand for medical care: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Am Econ Rev. 1987;77:251–77. PubMed
Newhouse JP, Insurance Experiment Group. Free for all? Lessons from the RAND health insurance experiment; 1993.
Roter D, Lipkin M, Korsgaard A. Sex differences in patients’ and physicians’ communication during primary care medical visits. Med Care. 1991;29(11):1083–93. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199111000-00002. PubMed DOI
Saltman R, Figueras J, et al. European health care reform: Analysis of current strategies. WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 1997 ;310(72). http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/partners/observatory/publications/studies/european-health-care-reform.-analysis-of-current-strategies. PubMed
Sauerborn R, Nougtara A, Latimer E. The elasticity of demand for health care in Burkina Faso: Differences across age and income groups. Health Policy Plan. 1994;9(2):185–192. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.2.185. PubMed DOI
Schor E, Starfield B, Stidley C, Hankin J. Family health: Utilization and effects of family membership. Med Care. 1987;25(7):616–26. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198707000-00005. PubMed DOI
Schreyögg J, Grabka M. Copayments for ambulatory care in Germany: A natural experiment using a difference-in-difference approach. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(3):331–41. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0179-9. PubMed DOI
Szalay T, Pazitny P, Szalayova A, Frisova S, Morvay K, Petrovic M, van Ginneken E. Slovakia: Health system review, Technical report: Health Systems in Transition; 2011. http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0004/140593/e94972.pdf?ua=1. PubMed
Tamblyn R, Laprise R, Hanley J, Abrahamowicz M, Scott S, Mayo N, Hurley J, Grad R, Latimer E, Perreault R, et al. Adverse events associated with prescription drug cost-sharing among poor and elderly persons. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2001;285(4):421–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.4.421. PubMed DOI
Trivedi A, Moloo H, Mor V. Increased ambulatory care copayments and hospitalizations among the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(4):320–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0904533. PubMed DOI
Van Doorslaer E, Masseria C, Koolman X, et al. Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174(2):177–83. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050584. PubMed DOI PMC
Van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Van der Burg H, Christiansen T, De Graeve D, Duchesne I, Gerdtham U-G, Gerfin M, Geurts J, Gross L, et al. Equity in the delivery of health care in europe and the us. J Health Econ. 2000;19(5):553–83. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00050-3. PubMed DOI
van Wijk CM, Kolk AM, van Den Bosch WJ, Van Den Hoogen HJ. Male female morbidity in general practice: The nature of sex differences. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35(5):665–78. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90005-B. PubMed DOI
Winkelmann R. Co-payments for prescription drugs and the demand for doctor visits–Evidence from a natural experiment. Health Econ. 2004;13(11):1081–9. doi: 10.1002/hec.868. PubMed DOI
Zapal J. Doctor-Visit Co-Payment Exemption for Children: First Look at the Data. Czech J Econ Finan (Finance auver) 2010;60(1):58–72.