STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of motion present at instrumented but unfused segments and at motion segments adjacent to the instrumentation following application of a new posterior apical short-segment correction technique for correcting adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: High-density pedicle screw instrumentation and posterior arthrodesis of all instrumented levels is the most common surgical treatment for AIS stabilization. The consequence of long fusion is an abnormal load on adjacent levels with an increased risk of future adjacent segment degeneration. METHODS: This new system applied translational and derotational forces over a short apical segment. The short apical region was prepared for fusion while maintaining motion of unfused vertebral segments. Radiographic data were collected pre-operatively, at surgery, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-one female patients, mean age of 14.2 years (10.6-16.9 years) with Lenke 1A/1B curves, were enrolled. The range of motion in the unfused instrumented segment was significantly higher than the apical fused segment (11 vs. 0.9, P < 0.001). The range of motion of unfused vertebral levels distal to the construct at one year did not differ significantly from their respective pre-op values. When the analysis was extended to understand the impact of lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) on motion of unfused segments distal to the construct, it appeared that (1) the change in motion from pre-op to 12 months post-op as a function of LIV is not statistically significant; and (2) The motion of the unfused distal vertebral segments at 12 months does not statistically increase with a lower LIV. CONCLUSION: Through one year, this novel technique achieved and maintained similar AIS correction to current posterior fusion techniques while maintaining the mobility of unfused motion segments with less implant density. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Albany Medical Center 47 New Scotland Ave Albany NY

Comenius University and UHB Bratislava Slovakia

Medicabil Hospital Bursa Turkey

Nottingham University Queens Medical Centre Nottingham UK

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre Oxford University Hospital Oxford UK

San Diego Spine Foundation San Diego CA

Sonoran Spine Center Tempe AZ

University Hospital Brno Orthopaedic Department Faculty Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Lonner BS, Auerbach JD, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Treatment of thoracic scoliosis: are monoaxial thoracic pedicle screws the best form of fixation for correction? Spine 2009; 34:845–851.

Newton PO, Marks MC, Bastrom TP, et al. Surgical treatment of Lenke 1 main thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: results of a prospective, multicenter study. Spine 2013; 38:328–338.

Clements DH, Betz RR, Newton PO, et al. Correlation of scoliosis curve correction with the number and type of fixation anchors. Spine 2009; 34:2147–2150.

Marks M, Newton PO, Petcharaporn M, et al. Postoperative segmental motion of the unfused spine distal to the fusion in 100 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2012; 37:826–832.

Bridwell KH, DeWald RL. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.

Etebar S, Cahill DW. Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (2 Suppl):163–169.

Lee CK, Langrana NA. Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. Spine 1984; 9:574–581.

Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, et al. Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine 1998; 23:1550–1558.

Sudo H, Oda I, Abumi K, et al. In vitro biomechanical effects of reconstruction on adjacent motion segment: comparison of aligned/kyphotic posterolateral fusion with aligned posterior lumbar interbody fusion/posterolateral fusion. J Neurosurg 2003; 99 (2 Suppl):221–228.

David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 2007; 32:661–666.

Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-a:1497–1503.

Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16:338–345.

Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali el H, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18:353–359.

Rehak L, Repko M, Grevitt M, et al. Novel posterior apical short-segment correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective multi-center study. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014; (in press).

Roaf R. The treatment of progressive scoliosis by unilateral growth-arrest. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1963; 45:637–651.

Harrington PR. Scoliosis in the growing spine. Pediatr Clin N Am 1963; 10:225–245.

Moe JH, Kharrat K, Winter RB, Cummine JL. Harrington instrumentation without fusion plus external orthotic support for the treatment of difficult curvature problems in young children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 185:35–45.

Luque ER. Paralytic scoliosis in growing children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982; 163:202–209.

Mardjetko SM, Hammerberg KW, Lubicky JP, Fister JS. The Luque trolley revisited. Review of nine cases requiring revision. Spine 1992; 17:582–589.

Rinsky LA, Gamble JG, Bleck EE. Segmental instrumentation without fusion in children with progressive scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1985; 5:687–690.

Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, et al. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995; 20:1399–1405.

Kim YW, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Free-hand pedicle screw placement during revision spinal surgery: analysis of 552 screws. Spine 2008; 33:1141–1148.

Fuller DA, Kirkpatrick JS, Emery SE, et al. A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis. Spine 1998; 23:1649–1656.

Abraham EP, Manson NA, McKeon MD. The incidence of adjacent segment breakdown in polysegmental thoracolumbar fusions of three or more levels with minimum 5-year follow-up. Global Spine J 2014; 4:83–88.

Gingsburg HH GL. Longitudinal study of back pain in prospective idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up, Phase IV. Scoliosis Research Society 30th annual meeting 1995; Asheville, NC: SRS; September 13–16, 1995.

Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, et al. Ability of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation to preserve distal lumbar motion segments in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord 1993; 6:339–350.

Betz RR, Harms J, Clements DH 3rd, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999; 24:225–239.

Preservation of Spine Motion in the Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using an Innovative Apical Fusion Technique: A 2-Year Follow-Up Pilot Study