• This record comes from PubMed

Evaluation of the infectivity and the persistence of Trichinella patagoniensis in muscle tissue of decomposing guinea pig (Cavia porcellus)

. 2017 Jan ; 116 (1) : 371-375. [epub] 20161022

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 27771802
DOI 10.1007/s00436-016-5299-4
PII: 10.1007/s00436-016-5299-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Trichinella patagoniensis, a new species of Trichinella, is widespread in Argentina. The success of parasite transmission depends, among other factors, on the resistance of L1 larvae present in the muscle tissue (ML) of dead hosts undergoing the decomposition process in different environmental conditions. The aim of the present work was to study the infectivity of T. patagoniensis muscle larvae in Cavia porcellus and the capability of the parasite to survive in decomposed muscle tissue of guinea pigs subjected to different environmental conditions. Thirty-two female Ssi:AL guinea pigs were orally inoculated with 2000 ML of T. patagoniensis (ISS2311). All the animals were sacrificed 42 days post-infection. Twenty-six animals were eviscerated, and carcasses were placed on the surface of soil inside plastic boxes that were exposed to environmental conditions in the summer 2014-2015 and autumn of 2015 in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Carcasses from six animals were placed into a plastic box inside the refrigerator at a temperature of 4 °C. The muscle tissue samples from the carcasses were examined weekly for the presence of larvae, and the infectivity of recovered ML was tested in BALB/c mice. Our results showed for the first time the ability of T. patagoniensis to complete its life cycle in guinea pigs, thus serving as a potential natural host. Also, larvae of T. patagoniensis remained infective in muscle tissue for several weeks while undergoing decomposition under different environmental conditions.

See more in PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2005 Sep 5;132(1-2):137-42 PubMed

Acta Vet Scand. 2002;43(4):203-10 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2005 Jun 30;130(3-4):255-62 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2008 Oct 1;156(3-4):234-40 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2003 Aug;89(4):744-8 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 1998;84(4):264-71 PubMed

Int J Parasitol. 2000 Feb;30(2):215-21 PubMed

Rev Argent Microbiol. 2016 Apr-Jun;48(2):101-4 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2000 Dec 1;93(3-4):393-408 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2004 Aug;93(6):507-9 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2013 May 20;194(2-4):168-70 PubMed

Parasite. 2001 Jun;8(2 Suppl):S209-12 PubMed

Int J Parasitol. 2012 Sep;42(10):903-10 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2014 Sep 15;205(1-2):397-400 PubMed

Parasite Immunol. 2002 Jul;24(7):369-79 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2000 Dec 1;93(3-4):241-62 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2015 Aug;114(8):3171-3 PubMed

Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009 Jan;22(1):127-45, Table of Contents PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2012 Jul;111(1):249-55 PubMed

Hear Res. 2005 Apr;202(1-2):200-8 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 1991 Aug;39(3-4):301-11 PubMed

J Helminthol. 2007 Dec;81(4):429-32 PubMed

J Parasitol. 1992 Aug;78(4):647-53 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...